similar to: Digium E1 card stops working til disconnect machine power cord

Hello list, I wondered if those of you using Polycom phones could recommend a decent cord detangler. I've had quite a few handsets get the tabs broken off in the jack from cord detanglers due to the recessed nature of the jack. This seems like it would work but I wanted some opinions before I go buy some: http://www.voiplink.com/Extended_Handset_Cord_Detangler_p/detangler-e.htm I

I am located in the UK, and I am using Sipura spa-2000 adapters to connect analog phones to a voip network. The network connects to the PSTN as well via the Sipura spa-3000 adapter. I would like to provide surge protection for the spa-2000 and the spa-3000 adapters. 1. For spa-2000, fxs port: What is the maximum tip-to-ring voltage before damage to the the adapter occurs? 2. For spa-2000,

On 21 May 2018 at 13:57, Bruce Hoult via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > "ADRL produces position-independent code, because the address is calculated > relative to PC." > > From this, I'd expect ADRP to simply do Xd <- PC + n*4096, where n is a 20 > bit number, just like AUIPC in RISC-V (also a 20 literal multiplied by 4096) > or AUIPC in MIPS

Chip Clock HT Cache Bus Speed --------------------------------------------------------- 5080 3.7 GHz YES 2MB 1066 MHz 5160 3.0 GHz NO 4MB 1333 MHz Does the .7 GHz and HT worth more then 4MB cache and higher bus speed? The application is VoIP so there is not a lot of IO so I would not think Bus Speed would matter. I am finding mixed information on HT, some say it is great, others say it

Hi everyone. I love JSON and using Prototype has help me reduce the code to handle AJAX responses. But one thing keeps me confused and sometimes even frustrated. I don''t really understand what is going on with the headers, so if someone could take some time to explain what is going on, I (and probably a lot more people) would be very thankful. The thing is this. On my local server (Mac OS

Trying to make openssh-4.3p1 with openssl-0.9.8a and zlib-1.2.3 uname -a SunOS gauss.hg.med.umich.edu 5.8 Generic_108528-13 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-80 Doing the configure I got these messages. checking lastlog.h presence... yes configure: WARNING: lastlog.h: present but cannot be compiled configure: WARNING: lastlog.h: check for missing prerequisite headers? configure: WARNING: lastlog.h:

We have a printing reliability problem with Samba printers/queues and we are trying to figure out how to troubleshoot it more methodically. Situation: We've been running Samba 3.x (always current/latest) for over a year with primarily Windows 2000 clients. This summer we are converting our 100 Win2K PCs to XP; this conversion is nearly complete. Our Samba printing is CUPS-based to HP

I haven't tried using -Os/z on any ARM device for the last 3 years, and back then, -Os would break many things. People normally care about code size on Cortex-R/M and ARM9 or older, and in there, not many LLVM users. --renato On 27 February 2013 00:38, Jim Grosbach <grosbach at apple.com> wrote: > I've not run any on non-iOS devices, and haven't looked at GCC since >

Thank you for providing the explanation for how ADRP works...something I should have done myself. With this explanation in hand, one other alternative I was looking at was using a linkerscript to essentially rebase the code and have ADRP instructions that would address the correct location as a result. However, I am not a linkerscript expert, so I am not sure if such a thing is even possible or

On 27 Feb 2013, at 00:45, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > People normally care about code size on Cortex-R/M and ARM9 or older, and in there, not many LLVM users. There are a lot of A8 devices around with 256KB (or less) of L2 cache (32KB of L1 i-cache), and so code density, if not code size, matters a lot for these. Cache sizes in mobile chips tend to be as small as

Hello, it is now 2am presently where i am and i have been at work since 8am yesterday. I am not allowed to go home unless i get this system up and running, else i shouldnt expect a job when i come back :s... now that you have some background, I am having no luck installing these two cards - i have already confirmed they are on their own IRQ etc, and if i run genzaptelconf, they are coming up

Hello, I have several customers describing something like annoying "silence suppression". So I did some tests and I can confirm. After disabling echo cancellation in zapata.conf the "silence suppression" effect is gone, but there is a little echo of course. I do not have this problem on other boxes where I am using oslec as an echo canceller. All my calls are SIP to ZAP (E1).

Hullo everyone, Iam new to Asterix but am trying to get R2 signalling working with a Digium E100P E1/PRA Card. My Telecom doesn't have an implementation of ISDN PRI yet, so it's R2 that is supported. Could anyone have a patch to fix this for me. Am told it has something to do with Assembly Language programming. Please help me fix this. Regards, Nicholas

Hi, I've been asked to see whether it is possible to do call logging for call center environments at a lower budget than the usual $1000 per channel. Afaik, with PRI this is possible through a high-impendance Y connection, but I wonder whether this would work with the Zapata cards. Anyone ever tried this? Regards, Cees -- XP SP2 can cause cancer in rats

>> Hi! >> I have an Asterisk Box with one E1. This is connected >> with PSTN. My problem is that periodically the >> Asterisk console shows the following message. >> >> -- B-channel 0/1 succesfully restarted on span 1 >> -- B-channel 0/2 succesfully restarted on span 1 >> [..etc...] >> >> I don't know if this behavior is correct.

Hi, I tried so many but can't find the right setting for my problem. What do i have to configure so that the complete number including extension is displayed at the called party. At the moment the called party only sees the number 7837-0 not the 7837-134. Everything works fine. Incoming and Outgoing calls. Is there someone who configured a german pri with that digium card? I really

We are having problems with the above configuration. A Canon fax in a SPA3000, Asterisk 1.0.9 stable with single Digium E1 card. Fax's are received well but sending is next to impossible. Anyone seen or heard of any solutions to this type of issue? Regards Mark ACC Australia Phone: 02 9489 0544 Fax: 02 9489 0522 Mobile: 0401 286 686 www.accaustralia.com.au

Hi it's possible to use a Digium TE110P Single T1 / E1 PCI Interface for supply a E1 link to a old PABX ? Thanks

hi! anyone please recommend/guide me of purchasing a resonably high performance server system regarding processor(s) & motherboard (+ other compulsary peripherals i.e. VGA, Soundcard). Mentioning up-to-date vendor+model will be more helping I've to use Digium TE411p Quad E1 card signalling on the E1 is SS7 no. of simultaneouse calls is 100+ regards -------------- next part

Hi, I am looking to buy 2 used 1 or 4 ports E1 Cards. If you have one, would you please contact me? Thanks, Pete -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20081217/48afd68d/attachment.htm