similar to: .spec files or .src.rpms for packages.digium.com

Hello, I'm writing here hoping to have a hint from Asterisk/Digium packager maintainer, Jason Parker (of course that any other's opinion is welcomed). We have installed an asterisk machine using Asterisk and Digium repos. Unfortunately we have found that an Astribank could not be connected due to the lack of the firmware files May 18 14:19:22 tenora1 kernel: usb 1-6: new high speed USB

but I need to apply this patch to the tar file in the dahdi-linux-2.2.0.2-1= _centos5.src.rpm and rebuild it, but that , `dahdi-linux` pulls in: dahdi-firmware dahdi-firmware-oct6114-064 dahdi-firmware-oct6114-128 dahdi-firmware-tc400m kmod-dahdi-linux kmod-dahdi-linux-fwload- yum-kmod That of which contain dahdi-firmware and kmod-dahdi-linux-fwload-vpmadt032 = which don't have srpms

I updated an AsteriskNow system to 2.6.18-194.26.1.el5 with yum update. Upon reboot dahdi modules cannot be found. In yum.log I see that kmod-mISDN, kmod-dahdi-linux and kmod-dahdi-linux-fwload-vpmadt032 were all deleted during the update. I reinstalled the deleted packages but the dahdi modules can still not be found. They do seem to be under /lib/modules/2.6.18-194.17.4.el5, but no for the

After using the CentOS repo's at digium to install dahdi Linux & tools, I got this: Installing : kmod-dahdi-linux-fwload-vpmadt032 WARNING: /lib/modules/2.6.18-164.9.1.el5/dahdi/dahdi_vpmadt032_loader.ko needs unknown symbol voicebus_transmit WARNING: /lib/modules/2.6.18-164.9.1.el5/dahdi/dahdi_vpmadt032_loader.ko needs unknown symbol vpmadtreg_unregister WARNING:

I made myself look a little silly recently in a talk regarding asteriskdocs.org. I didn?t realize the 4th ed. of the Definitive Guide was apparently actually out (http://shop.oreilly.com/product/0636920025894.do), because I went by asteriskdocs.org?s claim that it was being worked on in OFPS (now retired, apparently.) Is the 4th ed. available to read online like the 3rd ed. was? Is someone on

Hi, Just trying to figure out / solve some echo issues with one of our systems. The server is a Dell R710 running Asterisk 1.6.x and Dahdi 2.2.x The card in the server is a TE121P (with VPMADT032 echo canceller) We are experiencing some weird echo issues with our Cisco 79xx phones, only when we are dialing out via the PRI. The echo is like a side tone, where we can hear ourselves speaking. The

Dear asterisk users, We want setup TE121 digium board: Model: Digium TE121: VoiceBus technology allows the TE121 to use an industry standard bus-mastering PCI Express interface. http://www.digium.com/en/products/digital/te121.php My platform Server: HP Proliant 150 G5 OS: UBUNTU x86_64 GNU/Linux Asterisk: 1.4.21.2 zaptel: SVN-branch-1.4-r4662M When we enable zaptel driver for TE121, the

Running Asterisk 1.6.2.9, DAHDI 2.3.0.1, CentOS 5.5 (update to date as of a week ago), I've installed a Digium AEX800P with 2 X400M FXO Modules and 1 VPMADT032 Module, hooked up to 5 analog lines. I get the error message referenced in the subject in my dmesg output everytime I load / reload DAHDI using the command "system dahdi start/restart". When I make an outbound call over

Hello, I have several customers describing something like annoying "silence suppression". So I did some tests and I can confirm. After disabling echo cancellation in zapata.conf the "silence suppression" effect is gone, but there is a little echo of course. I do not have this problem on other boxes where I am using oslec as an echo canceller. All my calls are SIP to ZAP (E1).

Hi How can i know the version of my vpmadt032 firmware? Thanks Ruben

Hi pals, Pardon me if this question sound basic please. This is the first installation where I have to use the analogue card and therefore a little lusty. I have googled a lot, but though there is a lot of information about the above file, none indicate where the file lives. I have a installed asterisk and zaptel software on a fresh installation of CentOS 5. This all from source and following

The Asterisk.org development team has released Zaptel versions 1.2.24 and 1.4.9. Zaptel 1.2.24 Highlights * Linux kernel 2.6.24 compatibility * New module parameters for tuning VPMADT032 echo canceller modules * Improved interrupt handling in the wcte12xp driver Zaptel 1.4.9 Highlights * Linux kernel 2.6.24 compatibility * New module parameters for tuning VPMADT032 echo canceller modules *

The Asterisk.org development team has released Zaptel versions 1.2.24 and 1.4.9. Zaptel 1.2.24 Highlights * Linux kernel 2.6.24 compatibility * New module parameters for tuning VPMADT032 echo canceller modules * Improved interrupt handling in the wcte12xp driver Zaptel 1.4.9 Highlights * Linux kernel 2.6.24 compatibility * New module parameters for tuning VPMADT032 echo canceller modules *

Having some issues with a TE131 apparently causing kernel panics. This is on CentOS 5.10 with DAHDI 2.9.1 (also tried 2.9.2-rc1, no difference.) There?s also an Tracebacks are very similar to this one: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BrdrQf3CAAE3RXQ.jpg It?s configured with FXSKS signaling and the other end is an Adtran 850, though I?ve also experienced it crossed-over to an older TE13x doing

Hi Asterisk Users, We've been experiencing some tough time regarding a new Asterisk installation connected to the PSTN via an ISDN PRI with a Digium TE121 with the optional VPMADT032 echo cancellation module. For now, I'll focus on something very specific which is summarized on this email's subject. However, here are some general facts for the context: - System pbxfri went

[This email is either empty or too large to be displayed at this time]

When RHEL8 and CentOS8 were released, I was looking forward to setting up SAMBA as a AD DC server for CentOS8. But when I lifed the hood on the samba.spec file I found the option to build the samba-dc binary rpm has been disabled for rhel family builds. Apparently Red Hat does not want to support a unified SAMBA AD DC environment. I believe we have all of the componentns needed to set up a fully

Recent updates to gdk-pixbuf and gtk2 have the binary rpms in the updates tree, but not the src.rpms. I know we can just get those from Red Hat, but it's nicer if we've got a coherent, self-contained distribution here.... -- Matthew Miller mattdm at mattdm.org <http://mattdm.org/> Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/>

Hi All, does anyone here know where to get the source rpms for these two packages? anaconda-runtime-11.1.2.168-1.el5.centos busybox-anaconda-1.2.0-4.el5.centos I have found the anaconda-11.1.2.168-1.el5.centos on ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/5Server/en/os/SRPMS but not the others, is there a reason for this? regards Chad Pinnacle Technology Holdings E-Mail Disclaimer:

I am running centos-3 and have a question about rebuilding errata srpms from redhat. Do all i have to do is run rpmbuild --rebuild filename.src.rpm to rebuild the rpm for use on my centos system? I am talking about the src.rpms that dont have a a filename change for example the rpm file name change for kernels, etc that add c0 to the rpm filename I am assuming that if the src.rpm filename