Matthew Miller
2005-Nov-17 16:41 UTC
[CentOS] CESA-2005:810 / CESA-2005:811 -- missing src.rpms?
Recent updates to gdk-pixbuf and gtk2 have the binary rpms in the updates tree, but not the src.rpms. I know we can just get those from Red Hat, but it's nicer if we've got a coherent, self-contained distribution here.... -- Matthew Miller mattdm at mattdm.org <http://mattdm.org/> Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/>
Johnny Hughes
2005-Nov-17 16:52 UTC
[CentOS] CESA-2005:810 / CESA-2005:811 -- missing src.rpms?
On Thu, 2005-11-17 at 11:41 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:> Recent updates to gdk-pixbuf and gtk2 have the binary rpms in the updates tree, > but not the src.rpms. I know we can just get those from Red Hat, but it's > nicer if we've got a coherent, self-contained distribution here.... > >Absolutely ... they should be there :) let me check -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20051117/77b3f721/attachment.sig>
Seemingly Similar Threads
- CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 9, Issue 10
- CESA-2005:810 Important CentOS 3 x86_64 gdk-pixbuf - security update
- CESA-2005:810 Important CentOS 3 i386 gdk-pixbuf - security update
- CESA-2005:810 Important CentOS 3 s390(x) gdk-pixbuf - security update
- CESA-2005:810 Important CentOS 4 x86_64 gdk-pixbuf - security update