similar to: vignettes with similar names

In R 3.1.0 (~April 2014), support for vignettes in inst/doc/ will go away (and probably much sooner for CRAN submission), e.g. checking for old-style vignette sources ... NOTE Vignette sources only in ?inst/doc?: ?R.devices-overview.tex.rsp? A ?vignettes? directory is required as from R 3.1.0 and these will not be indexed nor checked I've been sticking with inst/doc/ for backward compatible

A new problem has cropped up with compiling vignettes for my package BayesFactor. I'm not sure when it started, but I can tell you it didn't occur on R 2.15.3, and it does on 3.0.0 RC (2013-03-31 r62463) (session info is at the bottom of this message). I have defined methods for which.min and which.max for a class (I've defined both S3 and S4 methods for the class

Hi, I want to use map("state") and have the ecoregion shape (please see link) file projected onto this. ftp://ftp.epa.gov/wed/ecoregions/cec_na/NA_CEC_Eco_Level3.zip ftp://ftp.epa.gov/wed/ecoregions/cec_na/NA_CEC_Eco_Level3.zip Could someone please show me how; I have never messed with this sort of thing. Thanks. -- View this message in context:

Just to save someone else a few seconds of googling: when you try to R CMD check with recent versions of R-devel and you get * checking PDF version of manual ... WARNING LaTeX errors when creating PDF version. This typically indicates Rd problems. LaTeX errors found: ! LaTeX Error: File `inconsolata.sty' not found. the Debian/Ubuntu solution is: sudo apt-get install texlive-fonts-extra

(Warning: There is some potential that this message is redundant.) I think that i have spotted an issue with R CMD check that does not trace back to a rare case, so it must have been reported already or i am doing something stupid. However, to be sure and because I did not find any comments on this while searching the R mailing lists, here is what i did: R CMD check . from within a package

Dear R-helpers, www.statistik.lmu.de/~*leisch*/*Sweave*/*Sweave*-Rnews-2003-2.pdf says that R CMD build creates the pdf from a .Rnw file. But when I do R CMD build followed by R CMD check it gives me a warning that there is a vignette without a PDF. My query is : when R CMD build works it creates a pdf in the doc subdirectory of the directory returned by system.file(package = mypackage) and not

I'l like to chime in on the subject of vignette checks. I have one vignette in the coxme library that would be better described as a white paper. It discusses the adequacy of the Laplace transform under various scenarios. It contains some substantial computations, so I'd like to mark it as "never ever run this" for both CRAN and my local builds, my next update of it will

Hi, I mentioned this at useR! 2012 but I guess the relevant R core members were not there (presumably Fritz, Duncan and Brian), so I'm making this wishlist again: Currently package vignettes have to be processed through Sweave, which is too restrictive since several add-on packages aiming to improve or extend Sweave have appeared (e.g. cacheSweave, pgfSweave, R.rsp, highlight, knitr, ...).

Hi, I've been thinking of moving to using asciidoc for vignettes. As part of doing so, it would be nice to have an R package with all the pieces preconfigured in order to let others build the vignettes without a lot of configuration work. Conceptually, the following combination would work: * rJava package * rJython package * ascii package for Sweave processing of original asciidoc source

Since release of R-1.9.0 is very close, let me mention that there seems to be a problem when building vignettes for package grid (see below), e.g. yesterday's R-1.9.0 beta on Windows NT 4.0. Uwe Ligges ==================================================== building/updating vignettes for package 'grid' ... Warning messages: 1: 'viewport.transform' is deprecated. Use

Hi, I found the following problem with recent R-devel (2010-08-26 r52817) on Windows (32-bit and 64-bit): 'R CMD build <pkg>' gets stalled during vignette creation for packages that have a Makefile in <pkg>/inst/doc. It seems that the problem is that the commands used in the Makefile for converting .tex to .pdf are not able to locate the Sweave.sty file anymore (if I drop

Dear List, Recently i changed my environment switching from 32bit XP to 64bit W7. I'm trying to rebuild my package with R 2.12.1 (2010-12-16) R CMD check --> everything ok, no warning, error nothing BUT R CMD build --> Error in tools::build Vignettes (dir = ".") : Execution of make failed (translated output) However, if i take the commands from the makefile, they all

I am experimenting with putting vignettes in a vignettes/ directory as suggested in the new R release news. If I understand correctly, it is now suggested that the vignette source (.Stex in my case) should be in the vignettes/ directory and the pdf should be put in the inst/doc/ directory, for the case when it is not being built by R CMD build. I am getting an error (R-2.14.0): (cd inst/doc ;

Hi, just saw "require vignettes to declare their encoding (trunk at 57560)". Having played with non-ascii vignettes (well, a lot of Chinese...) on-and-off for almost two weeks, I noticed it was a bit odd that a *commented* \usepackage[utf8]{inputenc} had any effort at all on R's Sweave behavior - while it is understandable (probably no check is made whether a "%" is before

Hello: Is it widely known that objects not explicitly deleted from one vignette in a package can be available to a second in "R CMD build" and "R CMD check" but not when the second vignette is built manually, at least under RStudio on Mac OS X 10.11.4 using R 3.3.0? For an example, see install.packages("pkgW2vignettes",

Currently Makefiles for vignettes are only supported for .tex files. Could the tools package be modified to allow file extensions to be specified for a vignette engine? Having the pandoc pdf conversion in a Makefile rather than through R would be tidier in some cases. If I specify my vignette engine as ``` tools::vignetteEngine( 'myengine', pattern = '\\.[Rr](md|nw)$',

On 21/02/17 19:06, Sebastian P. Luque wrote: > Hello, > > I'm trying to rebuild a package (using R version 3.3.2 (2016-10-31)) > that has not seen any changes since it was last built without problems > in previous R versions. It fails during vignette building with: > > ---<--------------------cut here---------------start------------------->--- > $ R CMD build

I am getting the following on CRAN windows and winbuilder https://www.r-project.org/nosvn/R.check/r-devel-windows-ix86+x86_64/penaltyLearning-00check.html Apparently there is an error in re-building vignettes, but I do not have any idea what it is, because all that is listed is three dots (...). Is this a bug in R CMD check? If not, the only solution I can think of is removing the vignette

Hello, This is a problem I posted about already some time ago: https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2018-September/076786.html Finally, I did had some time to create a minimal package to reproduce the problem that vignettes with child can not be build. https://github.com/wolski/RmarkdownVignetteProblem The problem basically is that while all the vignettes can be build by running

You are doing a lot of things that are non-standard, so I doubt if anyone is going to be able to help you without access to a simple reproducible example of a package that does what you do. Try to cut out as much as you can to make it minimal. For example, devtools::document() (indeed, most of your code) is probably irrelevant to your problem with vignettes, but things like your