similar to: bug-1215

Hello Everyone, I am a newbie. I am supposed to upgrade openssh on a centOS machine. Following are the current versions of openssh and centOS. /tmp# /usr/sbin/sshd -V OpenSSH_4.3p2, OpenSSL 0.9.8e-fips-rhel5 01 Jul 2008 /tmp# rpm -q centos-release centos-release-5-2.el5.centos I have already tried the following link. http://fr2.rpmfind.net/linux/rpm2html/search.php?query=openssh I am unable

Hello Everyone, I am a newbie. When I try to install GRUB2 on centos 5.2 system, I get following error. centos5: grub-install /dev/sda //sbin/grub-setup: warn: This GPT partition label has no BIOS Boot Partition; embedding won't be possible!. //sbin/grub-setup: warn: Embedding is not possible. GRUB can only be installed in this setup by using blocklists. However, blocklists are UNRELIABLE

Hello, I have recently installed openssh6.5 on my Centos box. And I can do ssh to my centos box. But SFTP fails at connection. I get following messages when I try to run sshd in debug mode. debug1: subsystem: exec() /usr/libexec/openssh/sftp-server Starting session: subsystem 'sftp' for op from 192.168.1.101 port 53994 debug1: server_input_channel_req: channel 0 request eow at

Hello Everyone, I have prepared following isolinux.cfg. default linux label linux kernel /vmlinuz append initrd=/initrd.gz But kernel panics with the standard message 'Kernel panic - not syncing: No init found'. Linux kernel version is 3.10. I tried to read the init.txt too.But could not figure out the issue. Can you please help me figure out the problem ? Thanks Sachin

Hello Everyone, We have centos6 server. And we are planning to upgrade it to Centos7.And GRUB 2 needs a new bios grub partition. Creating a new partition is too much risky. I am wondering if it is possible to replace Grub2 with Grub legacy on Centos7 machine? Thanks!! Sachin

Hello, Where does sftp-server logs its messages ? I am using centos 5.2. I used the following command in my sshd_config. Subsystem sftp /usr/libexec/openssh/sftp-server -l DEBUG3 -f DAEMON But I do not see any log messages in /var/log/messages. Thanks Sachin

On Mon, 2008-08-18 at 08:50 -0700, Eli Friedman wrote: > On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 6:31 AM, <Sachin.Punyani at microchip.com> wrote: > > assert(Res.getValueType() == N->getValueType(0) && N->getNumValues() == 1 && > > "Invalid operand expansion"); > > > > LOAD node has two values but the assertion checks N->getNumValues() == 1 >

Thank you so much!!! It worked. On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 8:04 PM, Barry Brimer <lists at brimer.org> wrote: > Thanks for reply. >> >> I replaced break=y with init=/bin/sh. >> In that case case system just hangs with the following message. >> "Freeing unused kernel memory : 400k freed". >> >> Thanks!! >> Sachin >> >> On Tue,

>I am assuming a 16-bit value will be stored in a pair of 8-bit > registers? One related question is how to make sure that the correct register pair is allocated to the16-bit quantity when using two 8-bit operations. In other words, how we can make sure that the 16-bit pointer is stored into [AH, AL] and not in [AH, BL] ? i.e. GR8 = [ AH, BH, AL, BL]; GR16 = [AX, BX] ; // AX, BX

On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 8:07 AM, sanjiv gupta <sanjiv.gupta at microchip.com> wrote: > On Mon, 2008-08-18 at 08:50 -0700, Eli Friedman wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 6:31 AM, <Sachin.Punyani at microchip.com> wrote: >> > assert(Res.getValueType() == N->getValueType(0) && N->getNumValues() == 1 && >> > "Invalid operand

Friends, I have recently built a file server on x2200 with solaris x86 having zfs (version4) and running NFS version2 & samba. the AIX 5.2 & AIX 5.2 client give error while running command "cp -R <zfs_nfs_mount_source> <zfs_nfs_mount_desticantion> as below: cp: 0653-440 directory/1: name too long. cp: 0653-438 cannot read directory directory/1. and the cp core dumps in

Hello all, I am a newbie at R, with some experience in PERL. I have a database table that contains the following data: Name | Score ======= | ===== Sachin T | 25 Sachin T | 53 Sachin T | 57 Sachin T | 34 Rahul D | 38 Rahul D | 31 Rahul D | 53 Ricky P | 7 Ricky P | 45 Ricky P | 27 Ricky P | 17 Ricky P | 86 Ricky P | 48 Jacques K | 23 Jacques K | 86 Jacques K | 32 I

Hi, In PHI node elimination pass to insert the copy in the predecessor block, there is a check if terminator is not an invoke instruction then place the copy there only. However for invoke terminator instruction a safe position is located for copy insertion. My doubt is why is this safe location search done only for invoke instruction and not for other terminators such as branch.

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1215 Matt Joyce <matt.joyce at cloudscaling.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |matt.joyce at cloudscaling.com --- Comment #13 from Matt Joyce <matt.joyce at cloudscaling.com> ---

Hi Sachin, Yes. Bernhard Scholz and I have just discussed a fix for this. I hope to commit it in the next few days. I will let you know as soon as it goes in to the mainline. Regards, Lang. On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 5:34 PM, <Sachin.Punyani at microchip.com> wrote: > Hi Lang, > > Thanks for your inputs on the problem. I was just curious to know if you > got any opportunity to

Hi Lang, Thanks for your inputs on the problem. I was just curious to know if you got any opportunity to work on the solution for this. Regards Sachin > -----Original Message----- > From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On > Behalf Of Sachin.Punyani at microchip.com > Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2009 12:00 PM > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Crash

On Jul 3, 2009, at 4:01 AM, Sanjiv Gupta wrote: > Sachin.Punyani at microchip.com wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> In PHI node elimination pass to insert the copy in the predecessor >> block, there is a check if terminator is not an invoke instruction >> then place the copy there only. However for invoke terminator >> instruction a safe

Hi Sachin, llvm-dev, I've just committed a new PBQP solver which, among other things, should take care of this bug. Please let me know how it works out for you. Cheers, Lang. On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 5:54 PM, Lang Hames <lhames at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Sachin, > > Yes. Bernhard Scholz and I have just discussed a fix for this. I hope to > commit it in the next few days. I

Hi Sachin, The declaration of functions called via the "call" instruction is a GlobalValue in your Module. You can go through all of the GlobalValues, look for those that are Function declarations (use the "Function::isDeclaration()" method), and then placing them in the appropriate place in your assembly file. Would that work? -bw On Jan 28, 2009, at 12:23 AM,

Sachin.Punyani at microchip.com wrote: > > Hi, > > > > In PHI node elimination pass to insert the copy in the predecessor > block, there is a check if terminator is not an invoke instruction > then place the copy there only. However for invoke terminator > instruction a safe position is located for copy insertion. > > > > My doubt is why is this safe