similar to: [Bug 2207] New: Potential NULL deference, found using coverity

Add private key protection information extraction to shh-keygen using -v option on top of -y option which is already parsing the private key. Technically, the passphrase isn't necessary to do this, but it is the most logical thing to do for me. Adding this to -l option is not appropriate because fingerprinting is using the .pub file when available. An other idea is to add a new option, I

Hello Everyone, I am trying to create two modules in LLVM, where first module contains the definition of a function, gcd in this example and another module contains a call to this function. My example is based on the following tutorial, with a few changes. http://llvm.org/releases/2.6/docs/tutorial/JITTutorial2.html When I execute the verifier pass on my modules, it complains that the

Hi, I have this piece of code: tm = local ? localtime(&curr) : gmtime(&curr); if (!tm) return NULL; which translates into something like: ---------------------------------------------- entry: %iftmp.0 = alloca %struct.tm*, align 8 %tm = alloca %struct.tm*, align 8 ... // Declares iftmp.0 as iftmp.0 call void @llvm.dbg.declare( { }* %iftmp.0, { }* bitcast

On Sun, Feb 5, 2017 at 12:25 PM, Nuno Lopes <nunoplopes at sapo.pt> wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > Many thanks for working on this! > SSI/e-SSA is the only way I'm aware of for doing efficient sparse > analyses, so I'm definitely in favor of adding support for it in LLVM! > > I read the discussion so far and did a cursory review of the patches, and > I have just a

I'm attempting to modify a parser generator to emit LLVM code instead of C. So far the experience has been trivial, but I am now running into an error regarding labels that I can't seem to solve. Situation 1: A label is used immediately after a void function call (l6 in this case): <snip> %tmp26 = load i32* @yybegin, align 4 %tmp27 = load i32* @yyend, align 4 call void

> On Mon, 2 Jul 2007 abhi232 at cc.gatech.edu wrote: >> Hello all, >> I am new to the llvm infrastructure so if this question is already >> resolved please redirect me to that link. >> >> I am writing a pass for flow sensitive and context sensitive alias >> analysis.for that i require the previous and next instruction of all the >> instructions.Is there

Hi all, When compiling some programs using the Mips backend i'm getting this assert message on lib/CodeGen/LiveInterval.cpp:227: "Range is not entirely in interval!" I don't know yet if it's something that is missing on the backend code or why the range to be removed it outside the interval, does anyone have any clue? A more detailed output is attached. The program i tried

Thanks a lot for the help guys.. I will try to get the information on these lines... Thank you once again... Will bug you guys after some time now. :) > I think you can refer to lib/VMCore/AsmWriter.cpp for these things. > > E.g., > You can use 'if(I.isTerminator())' if a instruction 'I' is terminator. > You can use 'if (isa<BranchInst>(I))' if a

I think you can refer to lib/VMCore/AsmWriter.cpp for these things. E.g., You can use 'if(I.isTerminator())' if a instruction 'I' is terminator. You can use 'if (isa<BranchInst>(I))' if a instruction 'I' is 'br' instruction. and so on... Thx, Seung Jae Lee ---- Original message ---- >Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 17:15:00 -0400 (EDT) >From: abhi232

Hi everyone. I'm currently running through FIPS validation, and this year CAVP requires KDF tests for SSH. I'm running OpenSSH v5.6p1 and I see that the 6 keys that I need are derived in kex_derived_keys in kex.c. However, I don't yet see any way for me to access this function from an existing command line tool, being able to pass in K, H, and the session_id from the test vector. Is

Hello. I have a problem which is quite basic for array optimization, amd I wonder whether I am missing something, but I could not find the LLVM pass that does it. Consider the following code snippet: int test() { int mat[7][7][7]; int i,j,k,sum=0; for(i=0;i<7;i++){ for(j=0;j<7;j++){ for(k=0;k<7;k++){ sum+=mat[i][j][k]^mat[i][j][k^1]; } } } return

In 0.9.7 the private key encryption was switched from 3DES to AES, (https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1550) the motivation for this being that 128-bits of security is better than the 112 or so you get from 3DES these days. Interestingly that bug is about upgrading to AES-256, but we ended up with AES-128. Presumably due to the Solaris crippling? However ssh-keygen still uses a

Hi Simon, The x86 backend does generate scalar SSE2 instructions. For your example, it should emit something like: .text .align 4 .globl _sum_d _sum_d: subl $12, %esp movl 20(%esp), %eax movl 16(%esp), %ecx cmpl $0, %eax jne LBB_sum_d_2 # cond_true.preheader LBB_sum_d_1: # entry.bb9_crit_edge pxor %xmm0,

ssh-add on OpenBSD current (with malloc -S enabled) crashes ("chunk is already free") when loading my password-protected SSHv1 key (used only for testing). "ssh-add ~/.ssh/identity" also fails to format the prompt properly ("Enter passphrase for :"). The issue is as follows: Starting at ssh-add.c:158 in add_file(ac, filename = "~/.ssh/identity"), we call

Hi, I have a problem compiling openssh pre 1.12 on solaris 2.5.1 platform with gnu gcc 2.95.2 u_int32_t is missing somehow and i cannot find any includes which define it. gcc -g -O2 -Wall -I/usr/local/ssl/include -DETCDIR=\"/usr/local/etc\" -DSSH_PROGRAM=\"/usr/local/bin/ssh\" -DASKPASS_PROGRAM=\"/usr/local/lib/ssh/ssh-askpass\" -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -c authfile.c

Remove sshkey_load_private(), as this function's role is similar to sshkey_load_private_type(). --- Dependency: This change depends over recently merged change in openbsd: https://github.com/openbsd/src/commit/b0c328c8f066f6689874bef7f338179145ce58d0 Change log: v1->v2 - Remove declaration of sshkey_load_private() in authfile.h authfile.c | 38

Hi, Can any llvm pass change simple return branch into select/return pair? For example: define i10 @mod_N(i10 zeroext %a) zeroext { entry: %tmp2 = icmp ugt i10 %a, -400 ; <i1> [#uses=1] br i1 %tmp2, label %cond_true, label %return cond_true: ; preds = %entry %tmp5 = add i10 %a, 400 ; <i10> [#uses=1] ret i10 %tmp5 return: ; preds = %entry ret

This patch makes keys work again. This bug was introduced in r1.78: http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/usr.bin/ssh/authfile.c.diff?r1=1.77;r2=1.78. Joachim Index: authfile.c =================================================================== RCS file: /usr/obsd-repos/src/usr.bin/ssh/authfile.c,v retrieving revision 1.78 diff -u -N -p authfile.c --- authfile.c 11 Jan 2010 04:46:45 -0000

According to the docs, InsertBranch should only be called if AnalyzeBranch returns success. But in targets (like ARM or Sparc) that don't implement them, the following test fails: ----------------------------------- void %__gcov_init() { entry: switch uint 0, label %cond_true.i [ uint 0, label %UnifiedReturnBlock uint 875573313, label

On Fri, May 25, 2001 at 02:21:06PM +0200, Nigel Kukard wrote: > Hi, > > [nkukard at wigglytuff .ssh]$ ssh-keygen -pf test_id > Enter old passphrase: > 'ey has comment 'ii > Enter new passphrase (empty for no passphrase): > Enter same passphrase again: > Segmentation fault (core dumped) > [nkukard at wigglytuff .ssh]$ > > > That is the error