similar to: BUILTIN not mapping on DC

I have a share with approximately 5000 folders in the base directory. The performance on an OS X client is somewhat less than exciting. I compiled the latest Samba 4.3 tarball and enabled fruit per the modules man page, however directory listing performance still takes a few seconds. I've cranked the fruit debug level up to 10 and can see that it is getting used ("fruit_stat called for

Hi Ralph, Thanks for the reply and thank you for your work on vfs_fruit. On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 11:09 AM, Ralph Boehme <rb at sernet.de> wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 10:40:32PM -0500, Ryan Bair wrote: > > I have a share with approximately 5000 folders in the base directory. The > > performance on an OS X client is somewhat less than exciting. I compiled

Arg.. wbinfo --gid-info=100 DC: Confirmed, DOMAIN\Domain Users Member: Fail. failed to call wbcGetgrgid: WBC_ERR_DOMAIN_NOT_FOUND Could not get info for gid 100 But both server show the same with : wbinfo -n "NTDOM\domain users" So imho, report bug if Rowland can confirm this with a samba from source. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba

Hello Samba team, I have 3 production samba DCs version 4.5.1 serving the same domain (2 sites) and all are having the same problems, I believe based on two duplicate xidNumbers described below. xidNumbers 3000002 & 3000003 have two SIDs assigned while xidNumbers 3000011 & 3000012 have no SIDs assigned. Is fixing this as simple as moving one of the duplicates to the empty xidNumber

I'm running Samba 4.0.7 on CentOS 6.4 running double duty as DC and file server. OS X clients are taking a _long_ time to list long directories. One directory with 10K entries is taking 3-4 minutes to display the entries in Finder. I captured a few seconds worth of packets and noticed that it's doing three requests per file: 1. NTCreateAndX - just opens the file 2. Close 3. FIND_FIRST2 -

Take a look at this output from lsof: smbd 11490 0 8u REG 3,3 55296 1136647 Maintenanc.fp5 afpd 31010 0 2u REG 3,3 3207 1136655 auction - envelope.rtf afpd 31010 0 5u REG 3,3 4156 1136656 Word Work File L 1 afpd 31010 0 8u REG 3,3 55296 1136647 Maintenanc.fp5 smbd 31386 0 9u REG 3,3 4156 1136656 Word Work

I attempted to set up unsolicited remote assistance via group policy, but connections to the client machines fail. A network trace show the 'expert' machine doing a TGS-REQ to the DC which responds with a KRB5KDC_ERR_POLICY. This seems to be the origin of the problem. I noticed in the request, the username of the 'novice' is given as the Server Name but is otherwise pretty

Hi all, Looking for a "best practices" way to share out to both Mac and PC easily. I know Windoze enables the same sharepoint for both the mac and pc shares and there don't seem to be any real "problems" by doing that. However I work in an environment which forces us to utilize Win9x through XP as well as OS 9 through 10.x on the mac side. I need a user friendly way to

On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 04:49:11PM +0200, Reindl Harald via samba wrote: > > > Am 17.05.2018 um 16:17 schrieb Ralph Böhme: > > On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 03:44:12PM +0200, Reindl Harald via samba wrote: > >> Am 17.05.2018 um 14:22 schrieb Ralph Böhme: > >>> iirc the only thing that is currently not working is cross-protocol xattrs for > >>> xattrs

Rowland, Thank you for the quick response. I have just run net cache flush no change in problem. I have dumped the idmap.ldp using ldbsearch -H /var/lib/samba/private/idmap.ldb > idmap.txt and did some sorting, that is how I found the duplicates. On 1/13/2017 11:09 AM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > samba-tool ntacl > >sysvolreset

Hi. I'm testing samba 4.2.0 vfs_fruit on Fedora Server 22-alpha. I confirmed that ResourceFork and FinderInfo are compatible with Netatalk 3.1.7. However, EAs are incompatible. The character ":" in EA name is wrong. The EAs are not seen from clients. smb.conf: [test2] path = /export/test2 writable = yes vfs objects = catia fruit streams_xattr fruit:locking =

On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 05:01:57PM +0200, Reindl Harald via samba wrote: > > > Am 17.05.2018 um 16:56 schrieb Ralph Böhme: > > On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 04:49:11PM +0200, Reindl Harald via samba wrote: > >> > >> Am 17.05.2018 um 16:17 schrieb Ralph Böhme: > >>> On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 03:44:12PM +0200, Reindl Harald via samba wrote: >

Hi folks, is anybody using those two products together and can give me any advice on how to do this? My specific issue has been addressed in other posts before, but as nobody responded, it would just now be interesting if anybody at least uses those applications together successfully? greets Malte

since "ea = samba" was only added to very recent netatalk versions and so don't apply to files with a history of many years what is the way to go get rid of netatalk these days? is there still no tool to read/write the existing netatalk appladouble extended attributes which are *not* compatible with samba and write them back in the new format? afp.conf: appledouble = ea ea = samba

When copying files to a Windows 10 client, an error is thrown if the file has extended attributes. In this case, the files were all created by an OS X client with netatalk. I'm using Samba from the Ubuntu 16.04 repository, which is currently 4.3.11+dfsg-0ubuntu0.16.04.11. In my smb.conf: # Netatalk configuration vfs objects = catia fruit streams_xattr fruit:encoding = native

Running Samba 3.2.3 on Debian Lenny, amd64. I'm joined to an AD realm, authentication works fine for Windows clients. I'm able to see that the clients are using Kerberos, not NTLM to authenticate to the shares. However when I look at the keytab, my entries have the short names like "service/shortname@REALM" instead of "service/fqdn@REALM". Looking at Windows servers on

I recently took over a x86_64 CentOS 4.0 server running an "unsupported" kernel. On examining the box it seems that perhaps it is because of the use of xfs and netatalk. I would like to update the box to 4.3. I think I can do away with the netatalk, but doing away with xfs would require a substantial amount of work. Questions: 1: In reading the archive of this list there was a post

I don't see it, and can't really think of a good reason why it would happen. This happens in configure? And the first thing you ran was configure, right? No autogen.sh or autoconf/automake? -bash-4.1# cat /etc/redhat-release CentOS release 6.8 (Final) -bash-4.1# uname -a Linux test-centos6.dovecot.net 2.6.32-642.6.1.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Oct 5 00:36:12 UTC 2016 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64

Hello, Anyone out there running a production network supporting PC and Macintosh clients using samba and netatalk. we are currently using NT 4.0 with AppleTalk-IP software. Sharing the same files with the Macs and the pc is a must. I read someplace that samba 2.2.2 supports Appletalk. Is this true? Thanks, Joe

On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 02:33:10AM +0900, HAT wrote: > Sat, 26 Dec 2015 17:22:56 +0000, Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org>: > > On 26/12/15 17:08, HAT wrote: > >> Hi, > >> I'm testing samba 4.3.3 vfs_fruit on Fedora rawhide. > >> > >> The EAs are not seen from clients yet. > >> > >> smb.conf: > >> path =