similar to: FW: SeDiskOperatorPrivilege

17th I should say, apols -----Original message----- > From:Stuart Naylor <stuartiannaylor at thursbygarden.org> > Sent: Monday 21st April 2014 15:06 > To: samba at lists.samba.org > Subject: Arch Linux Samba 4.1.7 > > Just been playing with my new favourite distro Arch Linux. > > 4.1.7 been in there repo since the 12th and all seems fine. > > 4.1.7 for

Hi Bjorn, I don't know if there are any compile switches they provide more debugging / log options. I guess its easy to modify the start up script so that logging is at a max. Was just an after thought really. I just think binaries for distro's are really important and many thanks. Stuart. PS I never got a reply but with 4.1.6 but with vfs objects = btrfs declared in smb.conf disk

Doh forgot to cc -----Original message----- > From:Stuart Naylor <stuartiannaylor at thursbygarden.org> > Sent: Tuesday 8th April 2014 21:16 > To: G?nter Kukkukk <linux at kukkukk.com> > Subject: RE: [Samba] DNS record info (samba-tool) > > Brilliant, glad about that as zones pretty much done on set up and no worry about a restart. > > Great that adding

Being a noob having something like webmin would be pretty cool swat has sort been swatted. In the many heads webmin would have a bigger reach than swat. So anyway been having a go. Apols but haven't done any hacking / dev for of 15 years! Also a complete noob to perl and doing it the video recorder way. Manuals Paaa!

John Putz wrote: > Thanks. > > */ > email: /**/johnputz3655@yahoo.com/* <mailto:johnputz3655@yahoo.com> > */home: 206-632-6522 > cell: 206-910-5229/* > > > ----- Original Message ---- > From: Joe W. Byers <ecjbosu@aol.com> > To: John Putz <johnputz3655@yahoo.com> > Cc: r-sig-finance@stat.math.ethz.ch > Sent: Friday, December 7, 2007

I ended up installing a newer version of GNU gcc and this time it worked. Thanks, Jim Naylor Unix/Storage Systems Administrator Schnuck Markets, Inc. * Direct (314) 994-4784 ))( Cell (314) 691-0186 Fax (314) 994-4684 * E-Mail jnaylor@schnucks.com -----Original Message----- From: rsync-bounces+jnaylor=schnucks.com@lists.samba.org

Hi! I just upgraded from Samba 3.6.6 to the Sernet Samba 4.1.7 packages as AD DC following the Samba AD DC / classicupgrade HOWTO and thought to share the experience so other users might find it in the archives. I also have some questions later on. I'd be very happy if some brave soul can give some advice on these (will come with a later post). The old Samba3 was running on an EXT4

Hi there, I have a working Samba 4 domain (4.1.5) with several DC's spread over a global network. They are all based on Ubuntu 12.04. At present the domain member fileservers for this network are all running Samba 3.4.7 and using NSLCD and *nix permissions to allow access. This is working nicely. I am now trying to create a new Samba 4 (4.1.7 Ubuntu 12.04) domain member fileserver and have

> I have a hack project on http://sourceforge.net/projects/samba4all/ > > It uses the sernet binaries with a few distro's and also has a webmin module for samba4 very hack as never done anything in perl before in fact I gave up dev 16 years ago. > > In /etc/default there is the sernet-samba.conf or what ever it is from memory. > > You need to set either "none"

I have the samba with AC DC running... that was fun...not. Debian Wheezy with backport, # samba --version Version 4.1.7-Debian and I am using BTRFS for the file systems. My issue. I have about 400gig of files that were shared with a samba the old way, security = user I was hoping I could just change the ownership recursively to be something standard, like root:sambashares and put it in the

Hello, a while ago I wrote the http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setup_and_configure_file_shares HowTo. When I wrote the HowTo, I setup and configured the share on a DC - what still works like described. Today I tried the first time to do exactly the same on a 4.0.10 and 4.1.0 _member server_, and it doesn't work there. The share in smb.conf: [demo] path = /srv/samba/Demo read only

As soon as I add the declaration for server side copies I hit problems with disk permissions. Same as in 4.1.6 and always the same so I will not bother to add a log. If you follow http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_a_home_share But have vfs objects = btrfs declared all is different. You can add users and groups but the default Everyone, CREATOR GROUP and a Unknown you just can't

Hi thanks Roger. Well I'm just using Ubuntu Server 16.04 LTS I only ran that command as a few guides say that's how to establish if a daemon is compiled with tcp wrappers: https://www.cyberciti.biz/faq/tcp-wrappers-hosts-allow-deny-tutorial/ I haven't really used TCP wrappers before so I'm not even sure if my hosts.allow entries are correct: upsd : ipaddressofclientgoeshere ups

Hi thanks for the reply. I installed Nut via apt-get, not from source (which I'd rather stick with if possible just for ease of security updates etc) - so I'm not too sure if TCP wrappers are there or available... This could be the problem, am I still able to add the wrappers in with prebuilt packages? Thanks very much once again. :) On 24 November 2016 at 21:51, Roger Price <roger

Try ALL:ALL in /etc/hosts.allow temporarily. If that still doesn't work, it's likely something else. If it does, only then screw with creating narrow rules . . . - Tim On November 25, 2016 6:37:02 AM CST, Roger Price <roger at rogerprice.org> wrote: >On Fri, 25 Nov 2016, Jonah Naylor wrote: > >> upsd : ipaddressofclientgoeshere > >If it were me I would write >

Hello Marc, Am 24.10.2013 21:00, schrieb Marc Muehlfeld: > Hello Thoralf, > > Am 24.10.2013 20:32, schrieb "Th. S?ldenwagner": >> is it possible to hide/restrict access to the home drives of our samba >> users when accessing them directly via netbios address? >> >> The server is running at school and there are several pupils who have >> the ability

Hi thanks Roger, I've amended my hosts.allow file to your suggested one - thanks for that. I'm still getting "Connection refused on the client cgi screen as well as in the shell it gives me UPS upsname at ipaddresshere is unavailable... Any ideas what I can try next to debug why it's not working. Also should the "allowfrom = clientIPaddresshere" line be in my monuser

Hi thanks for helping. I don't think nut is built with TCP wrappers support, although the package is listed as depending on libwrap... I ran this command: ldd /sbin/upsd | grep libwrap.so and it has returned no output. Does this mean I have to compile from source or is there a way to add the tcp wrapper support? Thanks again. On 24 November 2016 at 22:40, Roger Price <roger at

Hi, I bet this question was asked several times, but I'm honestly not able to find a solution. My samba4.1 (running on FreeBSD10) is part of a larger network/AD where I only have very restricted rights. Our network consists of a "toplevel" AD-Domain (top.foo.bar) and several "subdomains" (in my case: sub1.top.foo.bar), which have their own domaincontrollers (MS Windows

I have a share setup on a Samba 4.0.8 / CentOS 6.4 box that is successfully replicating with a W2K3 server. I'm following the HOWTO here: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setup_and_configure_file_shares [mytest] path = /home/me/mytestshare <-- with or without trailing slash read only = No On the W2K3 box, I can browse to \\newdc and I see my test share listed there. I can also see