similar to: samba4 - force ssl/tls for incoming ldap queries

hi there, the samba wiki currently recommends using rsync to achieve sysvol replication in an ad dc setup with more than one dc. this seems a bit kludgy to me ? using some sort of a distributed file system would probably be a more elegant solution. while researching this, i came across a few threads on this list, but unfortunately none of them provides a definite answer to which setup works to

hi there, i realize that this is probably the wrong place to ask - the question is rather ad-centric and not specifically related to samba, but maybe someone else stumbled upon this already and can provide a quick answer. having that out of the way, here is the question: when joining windows7-clients from a subnet $subnet.company.com to an ad dc-domain ad.company.com with a samba4 addc

Hi Philon, now, it's time for "Mahlzeit" ;-) Sorry, that I read the wiki1 instead of wiki2. I thought the 1 means that it is server one of ... my fault. Also not reading the first line above the menu. My focus was really on the content. ;-) Also my problem with the doc of Dovecot2 proxy is, that the document https://doc.dovecot.org/configuration_manual/authentication/proxies/

Greetings list, for weeks I still have problems with a security policy, now update my samba to version 4.2.3 and I have the same problem , it is related to a desktop background that want to come out on the PC.

Hi, is it possible to hide/restrict access to the home drives of our samba users when accessing them directly via netbios address? I have set up the home folders in ADUC. They are all mapped to drive H: and users have full access to their drive. The problem is, that others users also have access (accept write) to other users folders when opening the domain shares via \\<netbios

I have been using the rgenoud package for a nonlinear least-squares problem with lots of local minima, and it works very well but takes lots of time. According to the article refrenced in the documentation, the original GENOUD-software by the same authors seems to allow for user-supplied analytical derivatives instead of numerical approximations, which would probably save some time. Does anybody

hi there, running a simple test like time for s in $(seq 0 9999); do echo hello > world-$s; done takes a little more than a minute on a locally mounted test share on our samba server. the same test finishes in about 5 seconds when it is run on the server's file system, without samba. i understand that dealing with many small files isn't exactly the sweet spot of any (networked) file

Hello everyone, it's my first post here on this mailing list and I hope, I make it right. I posted a question on https://serverfault.com/questions/1031441/dovecot-as-proxy-with-submission and nobody was able to answer it. So I decided to push that question here (I'm talking about any new dovecot version and I've tested it with 2.3.4.1 (f79e8e7e4)). I try to run a dovecot proxy

Hi Thoralf, try to use a newer version of Samba 4.7 is already outdated. The Problem the smb-protocol and not Samba it self. As Steve French mentioned on the last SambaXP it will be much better with Linux 5.x. So maybe you try a new kernel Stefan Am 25.09.19 um 16:37 schrieb thoralf schulze via samba: > hi there, > > running a simple test like > > time for s in $(seq 0 9999); do

Hi Thoralf, I?d say first of all you should read the current docs for 2.x not the archived stuff. ?> https://wiki2.dovecot.org/ - (It?s even mentioned in bold in the header) Then to front multiple backends perhaps you want to take a look at Dovecot Director. ?> https://wiki2.dovecot.org/Director About SMTP I?m not sure why you would want to rely on Dovecot for that. I only do Postfix with

hi there, On 07/18/2016 10:24 AM, kendell clark wrote: > I can confirm this. […] maybe debian bug #827141 is relevant … we've seen similiar symptoms, recompiling samba and friends with the patch mentioned there restored the behaviour we got with pre-badlock 4.1.17. it boils down to winbind not re-using signed&sealed connections when pulling user information from the ad, which seems to

Hi! After installing a SuSE 8.0 Enterprise with Samba 2.2.3a, I've a lot of trouble with accessing files on my configured Samba shares. If I want to open a file on one of the shares with a double click in the Windows Explorer (WinXP) it needs exactly 50 seconds (!!!) to REALY open that file. If I use an application - the file will be open immediatly. Another problem is, that I've now the

Hello Marc, Am 24.10.2013 21:00, schrieb Marc Muehlfeld: > Hello Thoralf, > > Am 24.10.2013 20:32, schrieb "Th. S?ldenwagner": >> is it possible to hide/restrict access to the home drives of our samba >> users when accessing them directly via netbios address? >> >> The server is running at school and there are several pupils who have >> the ability

hi! i've got a problem with installing samba 2.2.6 on a HPUX 11.11 - machine: when i unzip and install the samba 2.2.6 and then start configuring ist with "./configure --prefix=/usr/local/samba" i get the following error: checking configure summary... WARNING: No automated network interface determination ERROR: no seteuid method available configure: error: summary failure. Aborting

hi jeremy / all, On 11/6/19 10:39 PM, Jeremy Allison wrote: > This is re-exporting via ceph whilst creating 1000 files, > yes ? What timings do you get when doing this via Samba > onto a local ext4/xfs/btrfs/zfs filesystem ? yes, creating 10k small files. doing the same on a local ssd, formatted with an ext4 fs without any special options: root at plattentest:/mnt-ssd/os# time for s in

> > liveice is still virtually unmaintained. it's no longer relevant with > > ices 2 for vorbis things, if anyone wants to maintain this or has > > patches, Scott Manley is the person to talk to. > > I don't have a place to put up web pages about LiveIce et al, and with > all the myplay stuff taking my time my maintenance has been > non-existant. is

Hello, Two questions for you this evening. How do you tell the difference between NTLMv1-style authentication and NTLMv2 style? The CIFS dialect NT LM 0.12 does both(?), so does not appear in the NegProtRequest message (nor in the flags, near as I could tell). Do you ascertain this by examining the SessionSetupAndX message? If so, what parts? Is it possible to have more than one CIFS

I'm having the same issue as the person here <http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CCcQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fforum.zentyal.org%2Findex.php%3Ftopic%3D18368.0&ei=fZ8WU4KCJLH_yQH6poDIBg&usg=AFQjCNG2y_hN3Ct-WGP9gwobz8Yrl_DKrA&sig2=jiDkFilv4DCZw50Ay5QV1w&bvm=bv.62286460,d.aWc>. I'm using Samba-4.1.5 as PDC with 3

Full_Name: Version: devel_2009-12-01 OS: Linux Submission from: (NULL) (146.87.149.164) Can ./configure be made/told to look in /usr/share/texmf/bin instead of /usr/bin or /usr/local/bin for pdftex and pdflatex? This saves me from creating symlinks, which, once there, create issues with other programmes I am trying to compile. Thanks

The new package "benchden" 1.0.0 implements 28 benchmark densities for nonparametric density estimation that were introduced by A. Berlinet and L. Devroye ("A Comparison of Kernel Density Estimates", Pub. Inst. Stat. Univ. Paris, XXXVIII, fasc. 3, 1994, 3-59, http://cg.scs.carleton.ca/~luc/devs.html ). This collection includes a variety of densities with different degrees of