similar to: samba 3 to samba 4 migration questions

Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 368417 xen-hypervisor-3.0.2-1-i386 Bug#368417: xen-hypervisor-3.0-i386: cannot start NetBSD-HEAD Warning: Unknown package 'xen-hypervisor-3.0-i386' Bug reassigned from package `xen-hypervisor-3.0-i386' to `xen-hypervisor-3.0.2-1-i386'. > reassign 380333 xen-hypervisor-3.0.2-1-i386 Bug#380333:

Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 366216 xen-utils-3.0.3-1 Bug#366216: vif-bridge: offlining the interface fails because interface already offline Warning: Unknown package 'xen-utils-3.0' Bug reassigned from package `xen-utils-3.0' to `xen-utils-3.0.3-1'. > reassign 369042 xen-utils-3.0.3-1 Bug#369042: xen-utils-3.0: does not work with 32.bit

>>I have a client in a similar situation. NT4 PDC w/Exchange 5.5 and Samba member servers. Main problem is that >>they're running an old custom Outlook/Exchange workflow app which locks them in until it can be replaced. Similar situation - though we've been able to replicate it fairly easily in google apps. >>As you're aware newer then XP cannot join an NT4 domain

Hi all, I am very confused with class. I am looking at some weather data which I want to use as explanatory variables in an lm. R has treated these variables as factors (i.e. with different levels), whereas I want them treated as discretely measured continuous variables. So I need to reassign the class of these variables, right? Indeed, doing class(southwest$pressure) (pressure being air

Hello, Currently have (and working for years) a Samba 3 PDC that also acts as a file server and a print server. Would like to migrate the DC duties only (at this time) to a Samba 4 AD on a new box without disturbing user profiles (all SIDs, etc. remain the same), domain member joins etc. Basically somewhat like an upgrade but on a new box with a new name and then demoting the old PDC to a member

I?m testing moving a current Samba PDC configuration from an existing Unix server to a new Debian server, and as expected, can?t login to the new PDC from a PC which had been connected to the old PDC. The new Debian Samba configuration is working okay in that I can join a new PC to it, login, and access shares. In a test environment I renamed the Debian server?s host and domain names to

I have the following code, which yields instance eval''s the block given: class Foo def bar(&blk) instance_eval &blk end def baz yield end end The effect of this is that self is reassigned: Foo.new.bar do # here, self is the instance of Foo # created by new end But normally self is the object in which Foo.new.bar {...} occurs. Foo.new.baz do

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Hi, in May 2015 I reported [0] that I can not import my S/MIME certificate. Issuer is GlobalSign. Jan Horak reassigned it to the nss guys ("This seems to be problem in NSS code, reassigning to nss component"), but then the ticket idled and was eventually closed by EOL of Fedora 21 (though I stated it persists with F22). I just reopened

Hello, I'm working on migrating an NT4 PDC to a Samba 3 PDC. The tricky part, is that the NT4 server is also running Exchange 5.5 which needs to remain running. So unlike a migrate and toss the NT4 system, I need to migrate, then demote the NT4 PDC to an NT4 Server, then (probably) rejoin the domain as Exchange Server will not run on a non-domain member system. Basically looking for any

On 12/10/2010 11:37 PM, Ian Campbell wrote: > severity 606589 important > reassign 606589 xen-hypervisor-4.0-amd64 > merge 606590 606589 > thanks > > At the core this is the same issue as 606590. I think a single report is > enough to allow this to be fixed in the relevant place, if the kernel > ends up being the place to fix then the bug can be reassigned as >

Hi, there are quite some ancient xen bug reports filed against packages that the BTS does not know (any longer) since they have been removed. I would appreciate it if you could take a look at the xen bugs (mostly xen 3.x stuff that was neither reassigned to xen 4 nor closed at the time xen3 was removed) and either reassign them to existing (source) packages or close them. The complete list of

Hi [this after some considerable thought as to R-help vs R-devel] I want to write a (S3) method for as.function(); toy example follows. Given a matrix "a", I need to evaluate trace(ax) as a function of (matrix) "x". Here's a trace function: tr <- function (a) { i <- seq_len(nrow(a)) return(sum(a[cbind(i, i)])) } How do I accomplish the following:

Hi, I suspect this behavior comes from a bug. If the behavior is as designed, I'd like to know the background of the design. - Bug information Version: 4.20.2 When a shared guest account is enabled and a NetBIOS name that was used within the past week is reassigned, the owner of the guest account becomes Account Unknown (S-1-5-21-*-501), and WRITE returns ACCESS_DENIED. (For example,

OK, not exactly a samba issue but maybe the Ubuntu maintainer reads this list and can provide some input. Problem: Ubuntu doesn't daemonize smbd. System: Ubuntu Lucid where a recent update moved many startup scripts into the "upstart" system. Now smbd is started and runs as "smbd -F". If I edit the upstart script (/etc/init/smbd.conf) so that it runs as "smbd

Contacted Scott Willard at Polycom this morning, he has since been reassigned to other duties within the organization. Mr. Willard's tone seemed optimistic, and he referrred me to Roger Austin, Regional Channel Manager for Voice. Roger's reply to my inquiry is as follows: "Cory, We appreciate your interest in Polycom VoIP Phones. Polycom deploys our VoIP phones with our VoIP

I am seeing the following messages logged every 20 min on a Centos 5.5 Samba 3.5.7 (SerNet RPMs) PDC. wins server = yes is set and the 172.17.1.50 address is the address of the PDC. From a Windows client perspective the the domain is functioning as expected. There is a Samba BDC and mulitple Win2008 R2 member servers in the domain. Are they anything to be concerned about? [2011/03/11

On Friday 05 October 2007 03:54, puppet wrote: > #829: Multiple source with recursion error > -----------------------------+--------------------------------------------- >- Reporter: paul | Owner: michael > Type: defect | Status: closed > Priority: normal | Milestone: unplanned > Component: library |

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=445 laforge@netfilter.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|laforge@netfilter.org |opensource@intra2net.com ------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org 2006-02-09 15:38 MET ------- ipt_account

Turns out that in my latest upgrade to Ubuntu 12.x, it reassigned /bin/sh -> /bin/dash and LLVM needs /bin/sh to be /bin/bash On 08/02/2013 03:45 PM, reed kotler wrote: > Has anyone ever seen this message in the test-suite output: > > /bin/sh: 7: test: 0: unexpected operator > > I'm getting a lot of them but otherwise it seems to be working just fine.

On 8/2/13 6:03 PM, reed kotler wrote: > Turns out that in my latest upgrade to Ubuntu 12.x, it reassigned > > /bin/sh -> /bin/dash and LLVM needs /bin/sh to be /bin/bash I would think that using bash specific features in a /bin/sh shell script is a bug. I remembering ferreting these sorts of problems out in the early days. Does LLVM now consider it okay to assume that /bin/sh is