similar to: Deleting ADDC Cadaver from AD

Hi, I build a setup on a Debian Wheezy with samba 4.0.9 and a compiled bind 9.8.4 with this configure options: ./configure --prefix=/usr \ --mandir=\$${prefix}/share/man \ --infodir=\$${prefix}/share/info \ --sysconfdir=/etc/bind \ --localstatedir=/var \ --enable-threads \ --enable-largefile \ --with-libtool \ --enable-shared \ --enable-static \

On 30.08.19 11:01, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > I'm very sorry to advise that this script is not race-free in the > locking done on the AD databases, which is why we have written the > 'samba-tool domain backup offline' tool which holds the correct locks. > > You should only need to back up the domain on one DC as long as you are > confident the DC is correctly

On Sat, Aug 17, 2024, 13:59 Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Sat, 17 Aug 2024 00:19:45 +0700 > fransnicho via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > Thanks for your response > > > > it at dc4:~$ sudo ldbsearch --cross-ncs -H > > /var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb -P -b > > >

Hi! We have a production cluster AIX 5.1 (HACMP) with Samba (2.99 alpha) as auth today, it handles aroud 800-900 users, we have no local users on the box except the one that must be there... But now we need to uppgrade. Now im testing the 3.0.4 I have manged to get samba to work in a native mode AD. with one domain the problem is when i try to use the production domain, thats runs in mixed mode

Hello Folks, I'm a Brazilian student. I'm doing some labs about SAMBA4 AD DC with 4 domain controllers (03 Linux Debian 8 x64 with SAMBA 4.3.1 installed by souce packeage and 01 Windows Server 2008 R2 Standard x64 to study for LPIC3 certification exam.) About the "samba-tool ldapcmp" (https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba-tool_ldapcmp), in my lab, even applying the indicated

Hola Javier: Me alegra saber que no soy el único cenutrio que se ha topado con esto. ? Se trata de un proceso de R que extrae datos de un fichero px descargado del INE y que contiene datos a nivel de municipio y de Comunidad Autónoma (que intento eliminar) antes de hacer la carga en el SQL Server porque solo me interesan las provincias. La BD no es ningún problema (el error se produce al tratar

Pada Sen, 19 Agu 2024 pukul 16.36 Rowland Penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> menulis: > On Mon, 19 Aug 2024 15:40:15 +0700 > fransnicho via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > Hi Rowland, > > Thanks for your response ? > > > > If I succesfully upgrade DC4 (the karoshi samba package) to samba > > 4.20, is there any

On Wed, 14 Aug 2024 16:58:12 +0700 fransnicho via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > I can not join an additional new samba dc ver. 4.19.5 to an existing > samba Ad version 4.19.5 functional level 2008 R2. > > Last week I successfully demote an offline dc3 and move the fsmo role > /var/log/samba/log.samba > > > 16:34:51.368927, 0] >

Estimado Gilsanz Algo que puede ser, ¿tiene instalado tcltk en Windows? Yo ante un problema parecido lo solucioné realizando un contador, en mi caso conozco la cantidad de consultas, entonces simplemente ?imprimo? en pantalla 1 de 100, 2 de 100, etc. No es gráfico, pero R me informa dos cosas, que está trabajando y cuánto falta, feo a la vista pero muy simple. Javier Rubén Marcuzzi De:

Hola: Vuelvo a la carga con algo que resolví hace años y que ahora me ha dejado de funcionar y no consigo arreglar. A ver si alguien me sugiere algún enfoque o directamente la solucion. Utilizo R en muchos procesos ETL y la cuestión es que me encuentro con que tengo que hacer inserts en un BBDD de SQL Server de varios miles (a veces millones de registros) que mientras R las realiza parece que

Pada Rab, 14 Agu 2024 pukul 23.21 Rowland Penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> menulis: > On Wed, 14 Aug 2024 16:58:12 +0700 > fransnicho via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > I can not join an additional new samba dc ver. 4.19.5 to an existing > > samba Ad version 4.19.5 functional level 2008 R2. > > > > Last week I successfully

On Thu, Aug 15, 2024, 10:35 fransnicho <fransnicho at gmail.com> wrote: > Pada Rab, 14 Agu 2024 pukul 23.21 Rowland Penny via samba < > samba at lists.samba.org> menulis: > >> On Wed, 14 Aug 2024 16:58:12 +0700 >> fransnicho via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >> >> > I can not join an additional new samba dc ver. 4.19.5 to an existing

Hola, ¿qué tal? Si la base de datos de destino es SQL Server, ¿por qué no pruebas con la función dbBulkCopy del paquete https://github.com/agstudy/rsqlserver? Debería poder cargar millones de registros en segundos. Al menos, en una única transacción en lugar de múltiples como con sqlSave. Un saludo, Carlos J. Gil Bellosta http://www.datanalytics.com El día 12 de abril de 2016, 11:55,

Hola: Me gustaría que me recomendarais paquetes o alguna forma de "hincarle el diente" para empezar a investigar en la siguiente cuestión. El proyecto trata de que, a partir de un numero grande de documentos pdf que contienen, básicamente, Notas Simples del Registro de la Propiedad deseamos extraer para cada uno de esos documentos una serie de ítems de información, a saber: -Finca

> > Hi > > > > > > I have multi domain environment with root domain and subdomain. > > Forest and domain level windows 2003 native. > > > Also forest prep and domain prep did for sccm 2007 ocs 2007 and > > Exchange 2003. > > > > > > After join Samba to domain like ad dc I had some problem with > > replication: > >

Hi I have multi domain environment with root domain and subdomain. Forest and domain level windows 2003 native. Also forest prep and domain prep did for sccm 2007 ocs 2007 and Exchange 2003. After join Samba to domain like ad dc I had some problem with replication: ################################################# [root at dc03 ~]# samba-tool drs replicate dc02 dc03

On 04/07/2017 8:40 AM, Lipatz Jean-Luc wrote: > I would really like the bug fixed. At least this one, because I know people in my institute using this function. > I understand your arguments about open source, but I also saw in this mail list a proposal for a fix for this bug for which there were no answer from the people who are able to include it in the distribution. It looks like if there

This doesn't really strike me as a bug. Lots of (most?) programming languages expect you to handle this as an error condition. If you tried the same thing in C you would get the same error. -----Original Message----- From: R-devel [mailto:r-devel-bounces at r-project.org] On Behalf Of Lipatz Jean-Luc Sent: Tuesday, July 4, 2017 5:40 AM To: Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com>

On 04/07/2017 8:46 AM, Nathan Sosnovske wrote: > This doesn't really strike me as a bug. Lots of (most?) programming languages expect you to handle this as an error condition. If you tried the same thing in C you would get the same error. The bug is that there is no error signalled. It looks as though the write succeeded, when it didn't. Duncan Murdoch > -----Original

Hello All, Please help.. I can not join an additional new samba dc ver. 4.19.5 to an existing samba Ad version 4.19.5 functional level 2008 R2. Last week I successfully demote an offline dc3 and move the fsmo role to dc4. The command i used to join: it at dc6:~$ sudo samba-tool domain join NICHO.COM DC -UAdministrator at NICHO.COM --option='idmap_ldb:use rfc2307 = yes'