similar to: Documentation for /usr/lib/dovecot/imap executable

I run a pair of dovecot servers for personal small domains with several layers of backup in place ... - The two dovecot servers replicate to each via a Tinc vpn mesh. That gives email resiliency. - All mail is replicated via offlineimap to a 3rd server over that Tinc vpn. It's on the mesh, it has space, so why not ? - All mail is replicated as well as via mbsync to a zfs dataset on my

Hi, What are people doing for backups ? My current process is LVM snapshot and backup from that to NFS share. But there seems to be hints around the internet that people use/abuse "doveadm backup" for backup purposes even though it seems its original intention was for transferring mailboxes between dovecot instances. Assuming its ok to "doveadm backup" to an NFS share, is it

--gKMricLos+KVdGMg Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline I compiled R 2.3.1 on two SuSE systems. With SuSE 8.2 I got an error which I had not on SuSE 10: /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i486-suse-linux/3.3/../../../../i486-suse-linux/bin/ld: cannot find -lRlapack On both system libRlapack.so is made, but the size is verz different: SuSE 8.2: -rwxr-x--- 1 wf sys

Forgive what may be a newby question, but I'm trying to get a new setup working, and there are many different things confusing me. I'm trying for a gnus + dovecot + mbsync arrangement, with mbsync writing to maildirs, and gnus reading from those dirs with a dovecot invocation. Fairly standard, I think. I have multiple email accounts I'm trying to sync, all of them gmail. My problem

R gurus: I'm trying to get another round of rconifers out and I need some advice/help crushing differences in the examples test. I'm trying to make sure the max sdi values are being respected. I've added a tests/rconifers-Ex.Rout.save (from windows i386-pc-mingw32) and when I ran R CMD check (both R-2.13.0), I got the following results: * using log directory

Hi Max, > The Glasgow Haskell Compiler LLVM backend is generating a lot of code which > appears to be optimised by LLVM quite poorly. The problem is demonstrated by > this C source code: if I run this at -O3 under llvm-gcc from top-of-tree on x86-64 linux then (1) it computes that g(5) is equal to 95, and main is transformed to just print 95. (2) g is transformed into code with no

Hello, I am trying to create a plot often seen in hydrodynamic work than includes a contour plot representing the water speed with arrows pointing in the direction of flow. Does anyone have any idea how I might add arrows based on wf$angle (in the example below) to the plot below? Thanks in advance! Sam library(lattice) speed <- runif(100, 0, 20) wf <- data.frame(speed) wf$width <-

Hi, The Glasgow Haskell Compiler LLVM backend is generating a lot of code which appears to be optimised by LLVM quite poorly. The problem is demonstrated by this C source code: int wf(int sp[]) { if (sp[0] == 0) { return sp[2] + sp[3]; } else { sp[3] = sp[3] + (sp[1] * 5); sp[2] = (sp[2] + sp[0]) + 1; sp[1] = sp[1] - 1; sp[0] = sp[0] - 1;

Below you will find the output from a failed multi-level model run. I am trying to estimate the following model: Pr(PLFP=1)= logistic regression -> B1_j * bm + B2_j * wm + B3_j bf + B4_j wf + B5 yrsed+ B6 age+ B7 age^2+e_ij B1_j = G01 + G11 bmxd + d1 B2_j = G02 + G12 wmxd + d2 B3_j = G03 + G13 bfxd + d3 B4_j = G04 + G14 wfxd + d4 d1-d4 freely correlated Note that there is no

Hi, I have a dataframe wf existing of a header with different labels and beneath the values of those labels : wf: label1 label2 ... 0,45 0,21 0,10 0,45 .... .... I have a list fl <- c("label2","label3",..) Isn't possible to use the list elements in the list in order to subtract values from the dataframe? like : wf$fl[[1]] When I do in R I get :NULL

Hi, I'm using dovecot (version 2.2.13 on archlinux) in the simplest, no-brainer way possible. It sits between mbsync, which I use to fetch mail from servers, and Gnus, my MUA. Both mbsync and Gnus connect to dovecot with an invocation like this: /usr/lib/dovecot/imap -o mail_location=maildir:$HOME/.mail/ea/ I have three different mail accounts, all that changes is the final directory on the

I am seeing the wf loop get optimized just fine with llvm 2.8 (and almost as good with head). I'm running on Mac OS X 10.6. I have an apple supplied llvm-gcc and a self compiled llvm 2.8. When I run $ llvm-gcc -emit-llvm -S M.c $ opt -O2 M.s | llvm-dis I see that: 1. Tail recursion has been eliminated from wf 2. The accesses to sp have been promoted to registers 3. The loop has

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 >>>>> "wf" == lartc-request <lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl> writes: wf> The ip route how-to describes the following for setting up wf> source routing wf> #echo 501 uras.out >> /etc/iproute2/rt_tables wf> Error: argument "uras.out" is wrong: invalid table ID I''m

<!DOCTYPE html> <html lang="en"> &nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp<head> &nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp<meta charset="UTF-8">

David Peixotto <dmp <at> rice.edu> writes: > I am seeing the wf loop get optimized just fine with llvm 2.8 (and almost as good with head). I rechecked this and am I actually seeing the same results as you. I think I must have made a stupid mistake in my tests before - sorry for the noise. However, I found that we have a phase ordering problem which is preventing us getting as much

View Project Issue [1] Dear Gluster Users group, We are looking from feedbacks, advise and production experience running GlusterFS in cloud infrastructure environment. *--? Main aim ---* Using GlusterFS as a mechanism to ensure data application sourcecode replication in order to run a web based Python Framework

Hello, me again. I have a data frame that looks like this (actual dput output at bottom): > head(tencor) date lot wf.id s1 s2 s3 s4 s5 1 08.05.2012 W0X3H0 9 1238 1263 1244 1200 1183 2 08.05.2012 W0X3H0 10 1367 1396 1371 1325 1311 3 08.05.2012 W0X3H0 11 1383 1417 1393 1346 1328 I'd like to add a column to this that gives, for each row, the averages of the

> From: Chris Garrigues <cwg-bcc@deepeddy.com> > Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 09:45:16 -0500 > > [2004/06/24 07:38:05, 0] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:ldapsam_search_one_group(1782) > ldapsam_search_one_group: Problem during the LDAP search: LDAP error: (N > o such object) These lines appear to all be searching for base="ou=group,dc=borderent,dc=com,dc=borderent,dc=com"

Morgan, Iain (ARC-TN)[InuTeq, LLC] wrote: > On Sun, 2 Feb 2025, Jochen Bern wrote: > > > On 01.02.25 22:30, Christoph Groth wrote: > > > An --interactive option that behaves just like the one in cp would > > > solve the issue for me. I would happily alias scp to > > > scp --interactive. Is there any technical or other reason why scp > > > does not

Hello list, I am trying to avoid "Rifying" some of my SAS code to generate ROC plots, and the logistic.display() and lroc() functions in the epicalc package do what I want. However, I must generate my logistic model with bigglm because I have 1) limited hardware, 2) ~2.5 million rows, and 4 categorical and 2 continuous independent variables. When I attempt to invoke epicalc's