similar to: fts solr database size

On 13/11/2020 19:55, PGNet Dev wrote: > On 11/13/20 9:56 AM, PGNet Dev wrote: >>> (2) see here: https://wiki.dovecot.org/Plugins/FTS/Solr >>> >>> two useful settings are debug and rawlog_dir=whatever to be added in >>> the same line as fts_solr > > with > > ????fts_solr = ... debug > > line #35 @ https://pastebin.com/9ecLQspD _looks_ like

I've built a new dovecot + fts-solr instance; I've now picked up & am running the recently released solr 8.7.0. In a test account, I've one message -- in the 'Drafts' folder. On exec of fts 'index' doveadm index -u testuser at example.com -q '*' I get a 401 unauthorized indexing failure, only for the one dir+message in 'Drafts', 2020-11-13

On 13/11/2020 22:04, PGNet Dev wrote: >> I guess you didn't need to enclose username and password in quotes, i.e. >> >> fts_solr = >> url=https://myuser:my%40pass at solr.example.com:8984/solr/dovecot/ >> use_libfts soft_commit=yes batch_size=250 > > On 11/13/20 12:56 PM, John Fawcett wrote: > >> I guess you didn't need to enclose username and

On 13/11/2020 21:32, PGNet Dev wrote: > On 11/13/20 11:37 AM, John Fawcett wrote: >>> still dunno why the 401. :-/ >> >> So I just did a quick check of running dovecot with a standalone >> solr-8.7.0 instance and I'm not seeing any issues. > > +1 > >> I confirm I haven't configured anything for indexer or indexer-worker in >> dovecot, just

On 11/13/20 9:46 AM, John Fawcett wrote: >> (1) Can anyone yet verify Doveoct/fts-solr working with solr 8.7.x?>> (2) What logging config in Dovecot gets me more/detailed output for the fts_solr fail? >> (3) Any obvious clues as to what, specifically, is the source of this prob? >> > (1) I can't, I'm still on an earlier version I'll look for the 8.6.3,

>> A few clients have 25K and more e-mail >> >> I thinking about use solr like: >> ?fts = solr >> ?fts_solr = debug url=http://IP:8983/solr/ (solr in external machine) >> >> Does it make sense ? use dovecot_indexes and fts ? >> What is the difference in performance? >> > Hi! > > Dovecot indexes are not actually related to FTS that

> On 02/11/2020 15:11 PGNet Dev <pgnet.dev at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 11/2/20 12:44 AM, Aki Tuomi wrote: > > you should try removing use_libfts from your config line and let solr do that part. > > sry, i'm a bit confused. > > you'd suggested I _add_ it, > > https://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/2020-October/120258.html > > > I

Hi I have a question about tunning dovecot-2.2.36.x Mail was stared in storage via nfs in MAILDIR via /home/us/username at domain.ltd/MAILDIR/ I use additionally local dovecot_indexes via SSD disk (/var/dovecot_indexes%h) A few clients have 25K and more e-mail I thinking about use solr like: ?fts = solr ?fts_solr = debug url=http://IP:8983/solr/ (solr in external machine) Does it make sense ?

Am Donnerstag, den 04.07.2019, 12:27 +0300 schrieb Aki Tuomi via dovecot: > On 4.7.2019 12.22, Maciej Milaszewski IQ PL via dovecot wrote: > > Hi > > So you're advised to use a solr or something else? > > > > Using any FTS is advisable, currently suitable ones would be SOLR or > Xapian (see https://github.com/grosjo/fts-xapian) > Hi Aki, I didn't yet

The Solr FTS engine appends domain names to the "user" and "id" fields inside Solr when indexing. However, when an IMAP search is performed, the domain name is not appended, resulting in 0 results, 100% of the time. You can reproduce this by setting up dovecot to have user names like?"admin", "james", etc (as opposed to admin at example.com). Then import

i use solr fts indexing. It worls very well but it have one database per system, not per user. Lets suppose i delete one or more e-mail users in system. How to remove them in solr database to reclaim space?

Thanks, but how? I looked through solr documentation and found anything useful. For now got it working setting up nginx and strip down the header, but I think it isn't the proper solution. Cheers Il giorno ven 30 nov 2018 alle ore 09:48 Aki Tuomi < aki.tuomi at open-xchange.com> ha scritto: > > On 28.11.2018 9.52, Riccardo Bicelli wrote: > > Hello, > > I recently

Hi all, I have just stumbled over an issue with the FTS plugin of dovecot. For our primary namespace, INBOX and its subfolders, searching works without any problems but in a second namespace, which I have created for old/archived mails, searching of the mail text/body does not work. I can see the search request in the tomcat log but no result is created and the mail client (Thunderbird) keeps

Hello, I recently upgraded my solr installation to 6.6.5 When searching through dovecot solr throws this this error: solr Bad contentType for search handler :text/xml I'm running dovecot 2.2.10 on CentOS 7.5. Regards Riccardo -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

>Hi, > >we have activated fts-solr about a week ago and immediately started to >experience really *low* performance with MOVE and EXPUNGE commands. >After several days of googling, tcpdumping and straceing i was able to >find and resolve the problem. > >We are using Dovecot 2.2.27 from Debian Jessie (jessie-backports), >which is doing a soft commit in solr after

On 10/18/20 10:28 PM, Aki Tuomi wrote: > Dovecot FTS tokenization is not done, unless you have `use_libfts` in fts_solr setting, in your case > > fts_solr = url=https://solr.example.com:8984/solr/dovecot/ use_libfts changing - fts_solr = url=https://solr.example.com:8984/solr/dovecot/ soft_commit=yes batch_size=250 + fts_solr = url=https://solr.example.com:8984/solr/dovecot/ use_libfts

On 10/19/20 8:24 AM, John Fawcett wrote: > Depending how solr has been setup you could see the logging in the web > server access log. My access log is where I configured it in > /var/log/httpd/servername.access_log, yours may be different. here, not running a standalone webserver/proxy in front of solr. webui's provided by the built-in. my solr config atm, includes

Hello list, * apache-solr-3.6.2 * dovecot-2.1.7 I configured fts_solr for dovecot, but I have two issues When doing a search request within telnet 127.0.0.1 143 it connects to solr. Jul 21, 2013 4:38:15 PM org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore execute INFO: [] webapp=/solr path=/select params={rows=1&q=box:10361d30f8c4ea51ad7c00002ecaff3b+user:" tom at

re-reading your mail ... On 10/18/20 2:58 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote: > I do not use the fts-solr plugin, because my mail host in AWS does not have enough memory for that. is it that you're not using the dovecot plugin, but _DO_ have solr search setup? by what method/mean? or that you're avoiding solr usage altogether?

On 10/31/20 9:55 AM, John Fawcett wrote: > I can contribute a patch that solves the segfault. Unfortunately though > fts search may be more broken than this. It does not give me search > results, even though I see it querying solr and getting hits. Thx -- hopefully it moves this in the right direction. Also on the 'good news' page, it appears there's been some progress on