similar to: High user number tune

Hello all! # dovecot --version 2.1.17 Sometimes I have this in the logfile: May 11 16:55:52 master: Warning: service(imap-login): process_limit (100) reached, client connections are being dropped May 11 17:35:03 master: Warning: service(imap-login): process_limit (100) reached, client connections are being dropped May 11 17:36:27 master: Warning: service(imap-login): process_limit (100)

I just upgraded my Ubuntu server from 11.10 to 12.04.1 and that upgraded Dovecot to 2.0.19. For some reason I'm getting a lot more (5 times) disconnect in IDLE and inactivity time outs. I'm using only IMAP with two users. Both users access the server from multiple devices, phone, tablet and desktop computer. I had previously set the max_userip_connections to 20 and rarely got the

I have two servers pointing to an NFS mounted mail spool with dovecot.? Since I recently switched from using Dovecot v1.X, I have been experiencing high CPU use with the two Dovecot servers. I am not certain why they are not well behaved.? Here is the configuration information. This configuration is currently running at a load average of 17. /usr/sbin/dovecot -n # 2.1.15:

hi we are using dovecot version 2.2.7 (config file given below) centos 6, qmail, vpopmail, mysql server configuration hex core processor, 16 gb ram 1 X 600 gb 15 k rpm for main drive and 2 X 2000 gb hdd for data (No raid) busy server with around 4000 email ids --- load is around 2 to 10 the issue is that SQUIRRELMAIL webmail users suddenly lose connection while they are working on the webmail.

Hello In my installation the disable_plaintext_auth does not appear to take effect. I can see that the value is correct using doveconf -a but it doesn't change anything. Whenever attempting to log in using IMAP I get this: * BAD [ALERT] Plaintext authentication not allowed without SSL/TLS, but your client did it anyway. If anyone was listening, the password was exposed. ls NO

I have, but I will be happy to review it once again. On 12/18/18 2:14 PM, admin wrote: > Am Dienstag, den 18.12.2018, 14:06 -0500 schrieb Albert E. Whale, CEH > CHS CISA CISSP: >> >> I have two servers pointing to an NFS mounted mail spool with >> dovecot.? Since I recently switched from using Dovecot v1.X, I have >> been experiencing high CPU use with the two

hi, one customer told us, that he has performance problem in his Thunderbird 3.1.9, while open his sent folder, which has round about 4000 mails in it, and 20k in his Inbox. For example TB, tries to sync the sent-folder list (over SSL) from the sent folder for now over 15min. In the log, I can't see any strange things, so for me, Dovecot works ok. Maybe, I should use better cache options?

Dne 07.09.2020 v 12:43 Sami Ketola napsal(a): >> On 7. Sep 2020, at 12.38, Miloslav H?la <miloslav.hula at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> I sent this into the Linux Kernel Btrfs mailing list and I got reply: "RAID-1 would be preferable" (https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/7b364356-7041-7d18-bd77-f60e0e2e2112 at lechevalier.se/T/). May I ask you

Hi, we upgraded our servers from version 2.2.13 to 2.2.27. After the upgrade we notice a 10x increase in traffic with the nfs storage an errors like this in the logfile: Nov 12 09:48:16 mail dovecot: imap(...): Error: Corrupted index cache file /.../dovecot.index.cache: invalid record size Nov 12 09:48:16 mail dovecot: imap(...): Error: unlink(/.../dovecot.index.cache) failed: No such file or

Thank you ! I was little concerned that the following settings are not in line with the new version: mail_nfs_index = yes mail_nfs_storage = yes mail_fsync = always mailbox_list_index = yes maildir_stat_dirs = yes mmap_disable = yes On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 10:19 AM Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at open-xchange.com> wrote: > It should eventually wind down once all the problems are fixed. Of

Been experimenting with virtual mailbox and have a question :- I have defined 2 virtual mailboxes 'all' and 'combined' as follows ... virtual/all/dovecot-virtual virtual/combined inthread refs x-mailbox INBOX virtual/combined/dovecot-virtual !INBOX INBOX/Sent INBOX/Drafts all When new mail comes I would assume that both virtual mailboxes should actually see the message

Hello, I have strange problem with "losing" emails after rename mail folder(s) (via imap client: thunderbird, roundcude, etc..) How to reproduce: 1. Create some folder name, like TEST 2. Create sub-folder under TEST (like SUBTEST) Structure: TEST |--SUBTEST # doveadm mailbox list -u postmaster at testmailbox Spam Trash Sent Drafts INBOX TEST TEST/SUBTEST 3. Move (or copy)

How problematic is it to have default_vsz_limit = 0 in dovecot.conf? macOS+MacPorts had this as a requirement even. Gerben > On 6 Jan 2023, at 16:49, Paul Kudla <paul at scom.ca> wrote: > > > i ran into this as well > > here is the full config for mine with replication > > # cat dovecot.conf > # 2.3.14 (cee3cbc0d): /usr/local/etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf > #

Copying or moving with email client: thunderbird, roundcube (webmail), mutt or any other email client via imap protocol. 25.06.2019 22:10, Germ?n Herrera ?????: > Are you copying/moving the emails with {cp|mv} or with "doveadm {copy|move}"? > > On 2019-06-25 12:00, Aleksandr via dovecot wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I have strange problem with "losing"

ok a little bit more info .... My servers all run under FreeBSD 12.xx which was also the base for the apple operating system origionally. setting default_vsz_limit = 0 i seem to remember trying with no so great results setting to zero can cause memory over runs (espically with replication) etc i found that when i used the config i sent eariler (vsz_limit is defaulted (not set )) everything

Hi every body. I'm having difficulties to setup my filters correctly and I really need some help. This is my environment: Mail that is received on the system passes through a sieve_before script that checks the message header for SPAM tag and store it into the "Junk" folder. If no spam tag is found, mail goes to inbox. My horde webmail is integrated with sieve, so this allow

Hi, I've been running dovecot for many years, but now i've hit a strange problem. when retrieving imap there is sometimes in 1 of 4 imap requests a 4sec latency. * notes: - connected directly to the backends this latency disappears - removing a director from the loadbalancer(lvs) so i'm the only connected to the director this latency disappears too I would appreciate some feedback

Hi, After upgrading Dovecot from version 2.2.27 to 2.3.9.2, we are sporadically seeing lots of these errors in the error log on many of our servers: imap-login: Error: master(imap): net_connect_unix(imap) failed: Resource temporarily unavailable - http://wiki2.dovecot.org/SocketUnavailable The issue is causing significant delays and/or timeouts on login. From what I can tell, this

We are gradually rolling out Dovecot (IMAP only, no POP3) to our customer base. We are replicating between a pair of CentOS 7 boxes. All has been working wonderfully. However, to be sure our rollout continues to go smoothly, we put together a simple benchmark client program to fire up X persistent IMAP connections (using hundreds of mailboxes) that login, list the folders, select the

Hi, After upgrading to dovecot 2.1.12, I see a lot of these errors: # 2.1.12: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # OS: Linux 2.6.32-279.14.1.el6.x86_64 x86_64 CentOS release 6.3 (Final) # Filesystem: ext4 with mdbox storage Dec 10 15:21:04 mail dovecot: imap(user at example.org): Error: Cached message size smaller than expected (5010 < 8192) Dec 10 15:21:04 mail dovecot: imap(user at example.org):