similar to: Corrupted Mail?

Greeting I've managed to backup my emails from external email server via dsync and imapc: protocol like this: doveadm -Dv -o imapc_user='user at gmail.com' -o imapc_password="pass" -o imapc_host=imap.gmail.com backup -R -u duke at ejoom.com imapc: taken from https://wiki.dovecot.org/Migration/Dsync I wish to do regular syncing of 5min interval to substitute

On Mon, 13 Jul 2020 10:50:09 +0200 Robert Schetterer <rs at sys4.de> wrote: > perhaps this help > > getmail should use /usr/lib/dovecot/deliver That is what I used before and wanted to switch off. Here is the 2 main reasons: 1) It add extra header overhead similar to: Received by localost at time, etc....) 2) It put emails in local delivery queue so syncing becomes slow. 3)

Sorry if this is a bit off topic but I'm hoping list members here might have some ideas. Aim: use ISP provided email with restricted inbox size but keep an IMAP accessible archive of emails (including 'sent' messages) on a remote server. Scenario: - Don't want to run my own SMTP server - Have free ISP email with 1Gb mailbox limit and spam filtering that works well - Have remote

Hello, I've got a dovecot setup with virtual users coming from a MySQL database. The only system user I have is the vmail owner of the email store. What i'd like to do is use the program getmail to back up my gmail account and place that in my user's virtual mail store. I'm having issues making the configuration file and where to put it. Should it go in the virtual user's home

I have two seperate clients (using fetchmail) on two seperate machines that use the same login and the same ip address as each other fetching their mail over IMAP using IMAP idle. Naturally Dovecot assumes that they are the same machine but they are not so messages only get downloaded to one of the machines rather than both which is what I want. How do I get Dovecot to recognize them as two

> 2. install and configure OfflineIMAP to synchronize the IMAP folders between your ISP IMAP server and your Dovecot server; see for example > http://www.offlineimap.org/doc/quick_start.html OfflineIMAP is not the way to go. Many ISPs have very low size limits for the mailbox sizes. The one I am looking at right now does have this problem (unless you pay extra). From what I have

Am 25.10.20 um 21:01 schrieb Marc Roos: > > Maybe get something like Zimbra, such solutions also have support that > you can buy when you need it or don't have time (I guess). > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: R. Diez [mailto:rdiezmail-2006 at yahoo.de] > Sent: Sunday, October 25, 2020 6:57 PM > To: dovecot at dovecot.org > Subject: Looking for a

Hi all Is it possible to configure Dovecot's sieve plugin to act on message arrival to folders, other than INBOX? I wish to move messages fetched by pop3 fetcher to special folder, or sort outgoing mail to folders, specific to their recipients. Thanhs in advance, WBR, valery

Am 04.05.2015 um 21:04 schrieb Santiago Vila: > Greetings. > > Thanks to Jelmer Vernooij, who has just uploaded version 2.2.16 for > Debian unstable, I can confirm that this bug may still be reproduced > in version 2.2.16, so it has *not* been fixed yet. > > Several months ago I was told "I can't reproduce it in dovecot hg", or > something like that. Well,

Hi all: I am evaluating mail server solutions for a small business. The trouble is, I am only a part-time admin and a newbie to mail servers. Most guides I have seen are rather unrealistic: they encourage you to expose your e-mail server to the Internet, and hope that you have the resources to keep it patched up. I would rather have an internal mail server that collects e-mails from a standard

First of all, thanks for your answer. > What is the problem with having huge online mailboxes? Just choose a > good european provider that has encryption all the way through to their> storage platform. We already have a European ISP with a standard e-mail server. I wanted to keep our own mail server on premises, so that it is not exposed on the Internet. The current server fetches (and

>> I would not advice any company that is continuously being fined for breaking the law. > This is not only an overstatement, it is completely irrelevant.? Given the OP problem > statement (small business, part-time admin, newbie to mail > servers), I do not think there is a better solution > A small server already costs 20 USD / month, running a mail server consumes a

On Sun, 15 Feb 2015, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On 14 Feb 2015, at 16:23, Santiago Vila <sanvila at unex.es> wrote: > > > I wrote about this three weeks ago but got no answer. I'm going to > > officially "forward" the Debian bug this time, with all the details. > > > > The test case is just 840 bytes long. Please give it a try. [ Small correction:

http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/rc/dovecot-2.2.13.rc1.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/rc/dovecot-2.2.13.rc1.tar.gz.sig There have been a ton of smaller and some larger changes since v2.2.12, so I thought I'd first make a RC release and the final v2.2.13 tomorrow. Please try it out! BTW. I've read most of the mails again in Dovecot mailing list, but there are still a few reported

http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/rc/dovecot-2.2.13.rc1.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/rc/dovecot-2.2.13.rc1.tar.gz.sig There have been a ton of smaller and some larger changes since v2.2.12, so I thought I'd first make a RC release and the final v2.2.13 tomorrow. Please try it out! BTW. I've read most of the mails again in Dovecot mailing list, but there are still a few reported

Am 04.05.2015 um 22:13 schrieb Santiago Vila: > On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 09:23:57PM +0200, Robert Schetterer wrote: >> Boh fetchmail .... did you verified with getmail ? > > No, I didn't. The client should be irrelevant. Nobody should be able > to corrupt a remote mailbox only by issuing imap commands. > > BTW: Does getmail have an option doing the same as fetchmail

Hello there, I am working with dovecot v2.2.12, and have setup a user and domain quota by using a quota/quota_rule for user and quota2/quota2_rule for the domain. This works fine when the limit configuration for both is stored inside dovecot configuration files. However, I would like to have the limits configurable on a user and domain base, and that data is stored inside my SQL database.

Hello NG, I want to add a samba v2.2.12 system as a member server to my domain managed by a samba v3.0.3 pdc. Is this possible? It's not as easy as joining a samba >v3.0.x system. My problem is, that I can't update the system to v3 right now. The users are all stored in a ldap-directory which I'm able to access onto the system using the 'id'-cmd. The system has also

Latest HG reproducibly crashes when accessing a virtual namespace: Apr 22 14:49:38 spectre dovecot: master: Dovecot v2.2.12 (09c114091c88) starting up for imap, lmtp [?] Apr 22 14:50:05 spectre dovecot: imap(tlx at leuxner.net): Panic: file mail-storage.c: line 1735 (mailbox_notify_changes): assertion failed: (box->opened) Apr 22 14:50:05 spectre dovecot: imap(tlx at leuxner.net): Error: Raw

[I posted this problem a couple of weeks ago and got no responses. So I'm trying again] I have a couple of applications on a WinXP/SP2 system that use data files on a Samba (v2.2.12, on Linux) shared drive. Immediately after booting the WinXP system these data files cannot be seen, yet become visible when the share is browsed with Windows Explorer. These applications are started