similar to: request for wiki access

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 7000 matches similar to: "request for wiki access"

2015 Mar 25
2
Fwd: request for wiki access
On 25 March 2015 at 16:41, Jason Brooks <jbrooks at redhat.com> wrote: > Hi all, could I have wiki access, I'm working on Atomic. > > Also, I think I once volunteered to help fielding wiki > access requests -- I can still chip in w/ that. > > Thanks, Jason > > ----- Forwarded Message ----- > From: "Jason Brooks" <jbrooks at redhat.com> > To:
2015 Mar 25
2
Fwd: request for wiki access
On 25 March 2015 at 17:04, Jason Brooks <jbrooks at redhat.com> wrote: > > Yes, please -- I have my acct set up. > > Thanks! > > Jason Done. Both your "home" page and the "Atomic" page expect your user name to be "JasonBrooks" and not the all lower-case "jasonbrooks" as shown in your forwarded message, up above. Alan.
2015 Sep 03
1
wiki page permission
Greetings! Can I have permission to edit: https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Atomic/Download I'm on this SIG. Regards, Jason --- Jason Brooks Red Hat Open Source and Standards @jasonbrooks | @redhatopen http://community.redhat.com
2015 Mar 25
0
Fwd: request for wiki access
Hi all, could I have wiki access, I'm working on Atomic. Also, I think I once volunteered to help fielding wiki access requests -- I can still chip in w/ that. Thanks, Jason ----- Forwarded Message ----- From: "Jason Brooks" <jbrooks at redhat.com> To: centos-docs at centos.org Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 7:50:51 AM Subject: request for wiki access Hi, my name is
2015 Mar 25
0
Fwd: request for wiki access
----- Original Message ----- > From: "Alan Bartlett" <ajb at elrepo.org> > To: "Mail list for wiki articles" <centos-docs at centos.org> > Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2015 9:52:49 AM > Subject: Re: [CentOS-docs] Fwd: request for wiki access > > On 25 March 2015 at 16:41, Jason Brooks <jbrooks at redhat.com> wrote: > > Hi all, could I
2015 Mar 25
0
Fwd: request for wiki access
----- Original Message ----- > From: "Alan Bartlett" <ajb at elrepo.org> > To: "Mail list for wiki articles" <centos-docs at centos.org> > Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2015 10:11:32 AM > Subject: Re: [CentOS-docs] Fwd: request for wiki access > > On 25 March 2015 at 17:04, Jason Brooks <jbrooks at redhat.com> wrote: > > > > Yes,
2019 Mar 05
2
request to have edit access to wiki
Hi all, I did try to do this myself as I thought Tuomas had introduced himself and gotten wiki access for other pages ... but my skills with the #acl markup have atrophied and I couldn't make it work. :) I'd like Tuomas to have access so there is a clear commit record of him having down the work, and in the future to collaborate on any adjustments to that page. best regards, - Karsten
2015 May 26
4
Kubernetes 0.17.1 in virt7-testing
Hi, kubernetes-0.17.1-3 is in virt7-testing repo [1]. Please test and feedback. [1] http://cbs.centos.org/repos/virt7-testing/x86_64/os/Packages/ -- Navid Shaikh IRC: nshaikh
2016 Jul 05
1
[DISCUSS] Wiki page for centos atomic registry
On 21/06/16 23:44, Jason Brooks wrote: >> I am not decided as to where in the wiki (location) of the proposed page >> will be, and am there looking out for suggestions. > > We could put it under: https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Atomic Maybe https://wiki.centos.org/HowTos might be a good place, since its essentially a howto get started with the registry. Would that
2018 Sep 18
2
[CentOS-devel] Authorization to use CentOS logo in GNOME Boxes
Thanks Rich for drawing this forward, I had missed it. (I generally handle all the trademark usage queries.) The key reference is this one, the trademark guidelines: https://www.centos.org/legal/trademarks/ That document should give the GNOME project all of the authorization and guidelines on how to use and not use the CentOS marks. Fabiano -- if you have any further questions, you may also
2018 Sep 18
4
[CentOS-devel] Authorization to use CentOS logo in GNOME Boxes
On 09/18/2018 11:03 AM, Fabiano Fid?ncio wrote: > My understanding is that we can use all the CentOS marks provided here[0]. > However, those unfortunately are not looking good enough on Boxes and > we'd like to use, if possible, just the logo as in here[1] > > Would that be possible? As far as I could understand that would be a > violation of the trademark. > > [0]:
2018 Oct 31
1
[CentOS-devel] Authorization to use CentOS logo in GNOME Boxes
Karsten, On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 10:06 PM Karsten Wade <kwade at redhat.com> wrote: > > Hi all, > > There is now a draft permission letter working it's way through the > CentOS Board. It is intended to cover permission for just the GNOME > Project's use with GNOME Boxes. This is *really* good news! > > I am still pursuing resolving this within the
2016 Aug 18
2
Updating PXE documentation for CentOS wiki
I was just looking at the CentOS Wiki at https://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/PXE/PXE_Setup, and it's pretty seriously out of date. It neglects the existence of the "syslinux-tftpboot" RPM, and the hand editing of xinetd config files for tftpd ignores the availability of "chkconfig" and "service" to manage that service. For more sophisticated users, it doesn't
2013 Jan 14
1
[LLVMdev] Obsolete PTX is NOT completely removed in 3.2 release
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 01:41:06PM -0600, Pawel Wodnicki wrote: > On 1/14/2013 12:40 PM, Brooks Davis wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 01:00:55PM -0600, Pawel Wodnicki wrote: > >> Brooks, > >> > >>> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 02:47:01PM -0600, Pawel Wodnicki wrote: > >>>> On 1/11/2013 2:40 PM, Brooks Davis wrote: > >>>>> On
2013 Jan 14
0
[LLVMdev] Obsolete PTX is NOT completely removed in 3.2 release
On 1/14/2013 12:40 PM, Brooks Davis wrote: > On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 01:00:55PM -0600, Pawel Wodnicki wrote: >> Brooks, >> >>> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 02:47:01PM -0600, Pawel Wodnicki wrote: >>>> On 1/11/2013 2:40 PM, Brooks Davis wrote: >>>>> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 09:33:17PM +0100, Benjamin Kramer >>>>> wrote:
2005 May 13
1
multinom(): likelihood of model?
Hi all, I'm working on a multinomial (or "polytomous") logistic regression using R and have made great progress using multinom() from the nnet library. My response variable has three categories, and there are two different possible predictors. I'd like to use the likelihoods of certain models (ie, saturated, fitteds, and null) to calculate Nagelkerke R-squared values for
2018 May 18
2
A Short Policy Proposal Regarding Host Compilers
I've heard just about zero opposition to this, so I've put a code review together here: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47073 With the intent of either implementing this policy change, or encouraging further discussion/bikeshed. Thanks all! -Erich -----Original Message----- From: Brooks Davis [mailto:brooks at freebsd.org] Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2018 10:34 AM To: Keane, Erich <erich.keane
2013 Jan 14
3
[LLVMdev] Obsolete PTX is NOT completely removed in 3.2 release
On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 01:00:55PM -0600, Pawel Wodnicki wrote: > Brooks, > > > On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 02:47:01PM -0600, Pawel Wodnicki wrote: > >> On 1/11/2013 2:40 PM, Brooks Davis wrote: > >>> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 09:33:17PM +0100, Benjamin Kramer > >>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> On 11.01.2013, at 21:31, Justin
2015 Oct 09
4
Contribute to the Wiki
Hi, My name is Norberto Aquino. username norbertoaquino I'm interested in translating the wiki for Brazilian Portuguese. Thank you -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-docs/attachments/20151009/2110e537/attachment-0002.html>
2013 Jan 11
0
[LLVMdev] Obsolete PTX is NOT completely removed in 3.2 release
On 1/11/2013 3:59 PM, Brooks Davis wrote: > On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 02:47:01PM -0600, Pawel Wodnicki wrote: >> On 1/11/2013 2:40 PM, Brooks Davis wrote: >>> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 09:33:17PM +0100, Benjamin Kramer >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> On 11.01.2013, at 21:31, Justin Holewinski >>>> <justin.holewinski at gmail.com> wrote: