similar to: Drag-N-Drop Event Sinking With Remote Call

It doesn''t seem to be possible, but perhaps somebody knows a trick. I have some lists that get too long and users can''t drag from list 10, for example, to list 1. Is there a way to get the browser window to scroll as they drag the item up? Thanks! Tom

Here is an example that seems perfect for Ajax that I have not seen implemented nor can figure out how to do it. I am hoping someone can give me some pointers. On the sign-up page, I would like to do my validations (password length, username uniqueness,etc ) Ajax-style. But if all validates, then redirect to the success page. The combining of redirection to a new page with Ajax is throwing me.

I''m wondering if there''s a max number of draggables. I have a situation where there are something like 60-80 draggable items and they work fine on the test server with only a handful of items, but in production with the full load they no longer work. It''s possible there''s something else different -- somehting with style sheets or something, but I wanted to see

Is there no better way to merge one array into another than iterating over the array you wish to append with each() and push()ing the elements on to the other array? Here''s what I mean: var arr1 = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]; var arr2 = [''a'', ''b'', ''c'']; $A(arr2).each(function(el) { arr1.push(el) }); Is there no better way to do it than this?

My Ajax.Updater is set for evalScripts and it receives this: <script language="JavaScript">complete();</script> It works in FF but not IE. Is the above code the proper way to return scripts? Thanks!

Hello, please take a look at http://test.reasonmaker.com/sort/ where I made some hacks to allow for nested sortables. I need a hierarchical, sortable list, so I hacked away. It generally works quite nicely, but: ( - The code needs my debug stuff and failed attempts removed ) - The code needs to be adapted to also work with vertical sortables. It probably breaks vertical sortables.

Hi, I''m using prototype/Scriptaculous in my open source project JSControlsTags http://jscontrolstags.sourceforge.net/ I''m Struts user and in the new version Struts2, the framework integrate AJAX with dojo and not with Prototype/Scriptaculous. I asked in the Struts forum, why Struts2 integrate by default dojo and not scriptaculous. Here Struts answer : ------------------------

Hey Cats, I''m having a problem. I''m working with an object that contains a bunch of arrays: var myObject = { "data": [ {"line": [1,"aoo","far"]}, {"line": [2,"boo","ear"]}, {"line": [3,"coo","dar"]}, {"line":

I would like to share a modification to bindAsEventListener() that might be useful to some of you. It makes it possible to do function show(event, number) { alert(Event.element(event).id + " = " + number); } Event.observe("el1", "click", show.bindAsEventListener(this, 5); Event.observe("el2", "click", show.bindAsEventListener(this, 10); That

Hi everyone, just joined the list (through the link on scriptaculous site). I''m using Scriptaculous 1.1b1 on a particular web site and I''ve been told that it consistently crashes IE 6 SP1 (on WinXP) - everytime my friend tries to access one of the page employing those scripts, IE dies with: "Application Error 0x0eefade occured in the application at 0x77e738b2..."

Hey cats, I seem to have ran into a problem in IE trying to use parentNode with the cleanWhitespace method. doing something like: var div = $(''mydiv''); Element.cleanWhitespace(div); works really great, but try doing: var div = $(''mydiv''); Element.cleanWhitespace(div.parentNode); or var div = $(''mydiv''); div = div.parentNode;

Has anyone else seen this? Error: uncaught exception: [Exception..."Component returned failure code: 0x80570009 (NS_ERROR_XPC_BAD_CONVERT_JS) [nsiXPCComponents.lookupMethod]" nsresult: "0x80570009 (NS_ERROR_XPC_BAD_CONVERT_JS)" location:"JS frame :: chrome://global/content/XPCNativeWrapper.js :: anonymous :: line 91" data: no] I got that output to the

Has someone come up with a generic way to handle ajax requests that exceed a certain time? In my concrete case, I have several select boxes for drilling down a hierarchy. When the user clicks an option, the next deeper level is retrieved. To avoid multiple concurrent requests, I disable the select box. As the request may take too long or cause an error, I set a timeout that re-enables the

I''m looking for a documentation generator for JavaScript code that can handle the coding style used in prototype.js and script.aculo.us. Any recommendations for such a tool? In a similar vein, does it make a noticeable difference in production when comments are removed and several script files are combined into a single one? Michael -- Michael Schuerig Most people

I''ve noticed that using several TimedObservers (prototype.js) on a page to watch for changes to text fields (haven''t tried forms) can have a non-negligible effect on the CPU cycles used by the browser process. Nothing dramatic, to be sure, but unnecessary. Autocompleter.Base (controls.js) follows a smarter strategy to watch for changes. Currently this functionality is tied

Hello, I’m getting some failures on our internal testing happening after this commit. I dug a little bit into it and it ended up begin caused by the fact that this optimization is sinking some instructions that shouldn’t be sunk In particular we have some loads that need to have a constant address to be selected, because they load from a “special address space”. What the optimization is doing

Hi all, The latetest trunk revision 1983 features are more streamlined directory layout and a new util.js file, that acts as a collector for stuff that doesn''t fit in elsewhere. To get a grip at the new Builder functionality look at the test in test/unit/builder_test.html (works only with Firefox). Note the "klass" instead of "class", this circumvents a

Probably the issue is solvable in some Codegen prepare pass. That said I still believe some kind of control on if we would like to implement this or not could be useful. Just a question. Why implementing it in SimplifyCFG and not as a separate pass like JumpThreading or something like that? The transformation itself doesn’t seem to fit much in SimplifyCFG. > On 2 Sep 2016, at 13:35, Michael

The reason for this is to allow folding of address computation into loads and stores. A lot of modern arch, e.g. X86 and arm, have complex addressing mode. Evan Sent from my iPad > On Nov 12, 2013, at 8:39 AM, Junbum Lim <junbums at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi All, > > In CodeGenPrepare pass, OptimizeMemoryInst() try to sink address computing into users' block by

I wonder why CodeGenPrepare breaks GEP into integer calculations (ptrtoin/add/inttopt) instead of directly sinking the address calculation using GEP into user's block. Thanks, Jun On Nov 12, 2013, at 12:07 PM, Evan Cheng <evan.cheng at apple.com> wrote: > The reason for this is to allow folding of address computation into loads and stores. A lot of modern arch, e.g. X86 and arm,