similar to: CEBA-2014:1270 CentOS 7 redhat-lsb FASTTRACK BugFix Update

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2013:0448 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-0448.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 240d5f608ee00f4d0e66c400dfc28e9ae53369d34d1dff53b3f252e06f053960 redhat-lsb-4.0-7.el6.centos.i686.rpm

Is it possible to eliminate the postfix dep that is required to update to the latest redhat-lsb rpm when upgrading to 3.4 can i just download the source and remove the postfix dep and rebuild, and update the redhat-lsb rpm on my system. i dont think that the post fix dep was there when i updated to 3.3 from 3.1

Hi All, In the example42 modules, I noticed the following is done: # Calculate OS version (without using lsb facts) $ossplit=split($operatingsystemrelease, ''[.]'') $osver=$ossplit[0] I''ve been using $lsbmajdistrelease in all my configs. Is there any particular reason why I might want to use the above instead? (apart from the dependency on redhat-lsb, which is

Any hope to have it fixed soon? This bug messes up the boot and shutdown sequence for those using dependency based boot sequencing.

Hello all, any updates on the progress of compiling WINE against the LSB? I know Dan was attempting to here http://www.mail-archive.com/wine-devel at winehq.org/msg47916.html but there's been no recent updates. Or, does anyone have any tips or tutorials or best practices to deploy a self contained WINE installation, e.g. Picasa style? Thanks, j

http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1645533,00.asp?kc=ewnws091404dtx1k0000599 -- My "Foundation" verse: Isa 54:17 No weapon that is formed against thee shall prosper; and every tongue that shall rise against thee in judgment thou shalt condemn. This is the heritage of the servants of the LORD, and their righteousness is of me, saith the LORD. -- carpe ductum -- "Grab the

Ok so your saying to just remove the redhat-lsb rpm. But, am I suppose to have that rpm for some reason...i can eliminate more packages from my system if i do remove the redhat-lsb rpm. I just though it was a required back that shouldnt be removed from the system...

when i checked the SPEC file for redhat-lsb i did a search for postfix and it didnt find anything...how can there be a postfix dep if its not mentioned in the SPEC file for redhat-lsb?

From: Rodrigo Barbosa <rodrigob at suespammers.org> > You didn't crossed me. Maybe it is because it is late here, and > english is not my primary language. I'm sorry if I gave you that > impression. > I just get repetitive sometimes, due to lack of better language > tools. Okay, I will keep that in mind. My apologies, and I should have picked up on that when you

Hi all, Would anyone know if CentOS 4 and 5 is LSB certified? I have not found any info on RH being LSB certified either. Is RH also LSB certified? In case you need to know, I am compiling a list of LSB certified Linux just for comparison as to who would want to be LSB certified. Just to see if it matters to ppl if it matters to be certified. --- Join OSCC MAMPU Mailing Lists

Hey All, Could someone provide a URL to a page that states what LSB level RHEL/CentOS 6.4 is certified to. I'm looking to download a driver: http://www.openprinting.org/printer/Epson/Epson-WorkForce_1100 They offer a driver for LSB 3.1 or LSB 3.2. I'm hoping that one of those applies to CentOS 6.4. -- _ ?v? /(_)\ ^ ^ Mark LaPierre Registered Linux user No #267004

I've noticed that some systems don't have redhat-lsb or even redhat-lsb-core installed and as a side effect, the ocsinventory agent reports them as 'linux' instead of Centos with the release version. Also, where it is installed and ocsinventory does pick up the name, it doesn't include Centos (pre-7.x) in the 'all Linux' grouping because the name is just CentOS and

Hi, it seems that Facter 1.6.9 complains that "No LSB modules are available." on every run. This is on Ubuntu 10.04 and 12.04, probably others as well. This message (on stderr) usually comes from calling "lsb_release -v" when no additional LSB modules are installed. Facter apparently calls "lsb_release -v -s" in facter/lsbrelease.rb. This is neither fatal nor

Hi all, I have a Cent OS 5 box with a fairly full install which I'm trying to strip down. Since this machine will be running headless I would like to remove all of the X11 stuff which is installed on it. However, it seems that the "redhat-lsb" package, which I would like to keep, is dependent on X11 - redhat-lsb depends on /usr/bin/lpr - /usr/bin/lpr is provided by cups -

Package: xen-utils-common Version: 3.0+hg11292-2 Tags: patch User: initscripts-ng-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: incorrect-dependency When testing dependency based boot sequencing, I discovered a bug in the init.d script for xen-utils-common. It is set to stop in the boot "runlevel" (S), but no script should stop there. Also, xend only depend on $local_fs, but

I just realized that if you don''t have redhat-lsb on your (Fedora 7) box, all those lsb* facts don''t show up. Should I make redhat-lsb a requirement for the facter rpm to guard against that ? David

I found out today that Google Chrome is now available for Linux. However, and this is a big but: $ sudo rpm -ivh google-chrome-beta_current_x86_64.rpm Password: warning: google-chrome-beta_current_x86_64.rpm: Header V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID 7fac5991 error: Failed dependencies: lsb >= 3.2 is needed by google-chrome-beta-4.0.249.30-33928.x86_64 xdg-utils is needed by

Hi, I'd like to load with pxelinux an RTEMS executable file, the format is ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), statically linked, strtipped Can someone tell me if there is a way to load it with PXElinux. When I try to do it, the error message is : invalid or corrupt kernel image Thanks for your help. Regards. Stephane ARQUER

I have 2 RHEL 5.4 systems where all facter lsb* items are missing. Any ideas? Sanitized facter output: architecture => i386 domain => missyou.edu facterversion => 1.5.7 fqdn => broken.missyou.edu hardwareisa => i686 hardwaremodel => i686 hostname => broken id => root interfaces => eth0,sit0 ipaddress => 1.2.1.5 ipaddress_eth0 => 1.2.1.5 is_virtual => true