similar to: CentOS 6 mount of ntfs formatted usb stick fails

BLS #rsync --version rsync version 3.0.4pre2 protocol version 30 Copyright (C) 1996-2008 by Andrew Tridgell, Wayne Davison, and others. Web site: http://rsync.samba.org/ Capabilities: 64-bit files, 64-bit inums, 32-bit timestamps, 64-bit long ints, socketpairs, hardlinks, symlinks, IPv6, batchfiles, inplace, append, ACLs, xattrs, iconv, symtimes rsync comes with ABSOLUTELY NO

Hi, recently I had to shut down an iscsi-raid an the connected servers. After the reinstallation and changing the ip config to match our new lan design, I can login to the iscsi device, the volumes are there and I can establish an iscsi link to some volumes. But, some other volumes on the iscsi device are reported with an invalid partition table or that they can't be mounted. e.g.: fdisk

Dear list, i have installed SQLiteDF (and SQlite 3.5.3 too) After the suggested dataframe generation iris.sdf <- sqlite.data.frame(iris) i have close R and than restart it for verify the correct load of dataframe : the file data1 is saved in the usual folder .SQLiteDF after the command : attachSdf("c:/R/Report/.SQLiteDF/data1.db","iris.sdf") R give this error

Because you need to separate the instructions with a ; (semi-colon). Hope this helps Rui Barradas Enviado a partir do meu smartphone Samsung Galaxy.-------- Mensagem original --------De: Ek Esawi <esawiek at gmail.com> Data: 08/01/2018 16:03 (GMT+00:00) Para: Jeff Newmiller <jdnewmil at dcn.davis.ca.us>, r-help at r-project.org Assunto: Re: [R] Replace NAs in split lists Thank you

I don't know. You seem to be posting in HTML so your code is mangled. Can you post plain text and use the reprex package to make sure it produces the errorin a clean R session? -- Sent from my phone. Please excuse my brevity. On January 8, 2018 8:03:45 AM PST, Ek Esawi <esawiek at gmail.com> wrote: >Thank you Jeff. Your code works, as usual , perfectly. I am just >wondering why

OPS! Sorry i did indeed posted the code in HTML; should have known better. ifelse(is.na(z$Value),z$Value[!is.na(z$Value)][1],z$Value)z}) error. unexpected symbol in sdf2 On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 11:44 AM, Jeff Newmiller <jdnewmil at dcn.davis.ca.us> wrote: > I don't know. You seem to be posting in HTML so your code is mangled. Can you post plain text and use the reprex package to

Thank you Jeff. Your code works, as usual , perfectly. I am just wondering why if i put the whole code in one line, i get an error message. sdf2 <- lapply( sdf, function(z){z$Value <-ifelse(is.na(z$Value),z$Value[!is.na(z$Value)][1],z$Value)z}) error. unexpected symbol in sdf2 Thanks again EK On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 3:12 AM, Jeff Newmiller <jdnewmil at dcn.davis.ca.us> wrote: >

Should I report this as a bug somewhere? Or is it just a problem with the old fedora box, probably fixed long ago and not relevant to the centos list? On the server side, theme4, a very old fedora box, exports t4d5 via NFS. t4d5 is big, has lots of space, and the user tobiasf has plenty of quota: [root at theme4 ~]# quota -vls tobiasf|grep sdf /dev/sdf1 1312G 4578G 4769G

I just came up with a solution right after i posted the question, but i figured there must be a better and shorter one.than my solution sdf1[[1]][1,4]<-lapplyresults[[1]] sdf1[[2]][1,4]<-lapplyresults[[2]] EK On Sun, Jan 7, 2018 at 10:13 PM, Ek Esawi <esawiek at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all-- > > I stumbled on this problem online. I did not like the solution given > there

Upon closer examination I see that you are not using the split version of df1 as I usually would, so here is a reproducible example: #---- df1 <- read.table( text= "ID ID_2 Firist Value 1 a aa TRUE 2 2 a ab FALSE NA 3 a ac FALSE NA 4 b aa TRUE 5 5 b ab FALSE NA ", header=TRUE, as.is=TRUE ) sdf <- split( df1, df1$ID ) # note the extra [ 1 ]

Hi, I have two dataframes one with 144 rows and 160 columns (SDF1) and one with 12 rows and 160 columns (SDF2). Now I'm trying to divide rows 1:12 with SDF2, rows 13:24 with SDF2, rows 25:36 with SDF 2, . In S-Plus the following code works fine: DFS = SDF1[1:144,1:60] / as.vector(SDF2[1:12,1:160]) but in R when I try to implement the formula I get the following error: "/

Yes, you are right if the IDs are always sequentially-adjacent and the first non-NA value appears in the first record for each ID. -- Sent from my phone. Please excuse my brevity. On January 8, 2018 2:29:40 AM PST, PIKAL Petr <petr.pikal at precheza.cz> wrote: >Hi > >With the example, na.locf seems to be the easiest way. >> library(zoo) > >> na.locf(df1) > ID

Hi all-- I stumbled on this problem online. I did not like the solution given there which was a long UDF. I thought why cannot split and l/s apply work here. My aim is to split the data frame, use l/sapply, make changes on the split lists and combine the split lists to new data frame with the desired changes/output. The data frame shown below has a column named ID which has 2 variables a and b;

Why do you want to modify df1? Why not just reassemble the parts as a new data frame and use that going forward in your calculations? That is generally the preferred approach in R so you can re-do your calculations easily if you find a mistake later. -- Sent from my phone. Please excuse my brevity. On January 7, 2018 7:35:59 PM PST, Ek Esawi <esawiek at gmail.com> wrote: >I just came

Hello, I have installed ocfs2 without problem and use it for a RAC10gR2. Only Clusterware files are ocfs2 type. multipath is also used. When I issue : mounted.ocfs2 -f I have a strange result: Device FS Nodes /dev/sda ocfs2 Unknown: Bad magic number in inode /dev/sda1 ocfs2 pocrhel2, pocrhel1 /dev/sdb ocfs2 Not mounted /dev/sdf

I got the email that a drive in my 4-drive RAID10 setup failed. What are my options? Drives are WD1000FYPS (Western Digital 1 TB 3.5" SATA). mdadm.conf: # mdadm.conf written out by anaconda MAILADDR root AUTO +imsm +1.x -all ARRAY /dev/md/root level=raid10 num-devices=4 UUID=942f512e:2db8dc6c:71667abc:daf408c3 /proc/mdstat: Personalities : [raid10] md127 : active raid10 sdf1[2](F)

Hi With the example, na.locf seems to be the easiest way. > library(zoo) > na.locf(df1) ID ID_2 Firist Value 1 a aa TRUE 2 2 a ab FALSE 2 3 a ac FALSE 2 4 b aa TRUE 5 5 b ab FALSE 5 Cheers Petr > -----Original Message----- > From: R-help [mailto:r-help-bounces at r-project.org] On Behalf Of Jeff > Newmiller > Sent: Monday, January

"Enforce" is overstating it... results will differ if there are no non-NA values for a given ID, and there is a potential further discrepancy if there are multiple non-NA values. But these issues were not identified by the OP, so may not be relevant in their case. -- Sent from my phone. Please excuse my brevity. On January 8, 2018 6:41:33 AM PST, Eric Berger <ericjberger at

Hallo, "never change a running system" ... For some months I run btrfs unter kernel 3.2.5 and 3.2.9, without problems. Yesterday I compiled kernel 3.3.4, and this morning I started the machine with this kernel. There may be some ugly problems. Copying something into the btrfs "directory" worked well for some files, and then I got error messages (I''ve not

> I got the email that a drive in my 4-drive RAID10 setup failed. What are > my > options? > > Drives are WD1000FYPS (Western Digital 1 TB 3.5" SATA). > > mdadm.conf: > > # mdadm.conf written out by anaconda > MAILADDR root > AUTO +imsm +1.x -all > ARRAY /dev/md/root level=raid10 num-devices=4 > UUID=942f512e:2db8dc6c:71667abc:daf408c3 > >