similar to: "BUG: soft lockup - CPU#n stuck for X s! [swapper:0]"

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 7000 matches similar to: ""BUG: soft lockup - CPU#n stuck for X s! [swapper:0]""

2017 Aug 08
0
BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 36s! [swapper/0:0]
Never saw this email....Did anyone get it?? anyone know how to fix this?thanks again. From: KM <info4km at yahoo.com> To: CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org> Sent: Monday, August 7, 2017 11:26 AM Subject: Re: [CentOS] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 36s! [swapper/0:0] All,This happens on all of our CentOS 7 VMs.? but as stated in the email trail, the file
2016 Dec 08
0
BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 36s! [swapper/0:0]
Not sure if this was the last email on this.? If not ignore me. However I found a post for new operating systems that says to set the watchdog_thresh value instead of softlockup_thresh.? http://askubuntu.com/questions/592412/why-is-there-no-proc-sys-kernel-softlockup-thresh this is an Ubuntu post, but on my CentOS 7 system this parameter exists, and softlockup_thresh does not.??I have set it but
2016 Aug 18
0
BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 36s! [swapper/0:0]
2016-08-18 12:39 GMT-04:00 correomm <correomm at gmail.com>: > This bug is reported only on the VM's with CentOS 7 running on on VMware > ESXi 5.1. > The vSphere performance graph shows high CPU consume and disk activity only > on VM's with CentOS 7. Sometimes I can not connect remotely with ssh > (timeout error). > I'm also seeing those errors in several
2018 Apr 24
0
BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 36s! [swapper/0:0]
On Mon, 2017-08-07 at 15:26 +0000, KM wrote: > All,This happens on all of our CentOS 7 VMs.? but as stated in the > email trail, the file softlockup_thresh does not exist.? Should it be > added?? What is the best way to get rid of this behavior. > Thanks in advance and sorry if I missed something along the way.KM Yes, I see this behavior as well. Never have found a solution - other
2018 Apr 24
0
BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 36s! [swapper/0:0]
On 24 April 2018 at 17:16, <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote: > Adam Tauno Williams wrote: >> On Mon, 2017-08-07 at 15:26 +0000, KM wrote: >>> All,This happens on all of our CentOS 7 VMs. but as stated in the >>> email trail, the file softlockup_thresh does not exist. Should it be >>> added? What is the best way to get rid of this behavior. >>>
2016 Aug 18
2
BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 36s! [swapper/0:0]
> 2016-08-18 12:39 GMT-04:00 correomm <correomm at gmail.com>: > >> This bug is reported only on the VM's with CentOS 7 running on on VMware >> ESXi 5.1. >> The vSphere performance graph shows high CPU consume and disk activity only >> on VM's with CentOS 7. Sometimes I can not connect remotely with ssh >> (timeout error). >> > I'm
2018 Apr 24
2
BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 36s! [swapper/0:0]
Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > On Mon, 2017-08-07 at 15:26 +0000, KM wrote: >> All,This happens on all of our CentOS 7 VMs.? but as stated in the >> email trail, the file softlockup_thresh does not exist.? Should it be >> added?? What is the best way to get rid of this behavior. >> Thanks in advance and sorry if I missed something along the way.KM > > Yes, I see this
2017 Aug 07
4
BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 36s! [swapper/0:0]
All,This happens on all of our CentOS 7 VMs.? but as stated in the email trail, the file softlockup_thresh does not exist.? Should it be added?? What is the best way to get rid of this behavior. Thanks in advance and sorry if I missed something along the way.KM From: correomm <correomm at gmail.com> To: CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org> Sent: Thursday, August 18,
2016 Aug 18
4
BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 36s! [swapper/0:0]
This bug is reported only on the VM's with CentOS 7 running on on VMware ESXi 5.1. The vSphere performance graph shows high CPU consume and disk activity only on VM's with CentOS 7. Sometimes I can not connect remotely with ssh (timeout error). The details of last issues was reported to retrace.fedoraproject.org. ?Do you have a hint? [root at vmguest ~]# abrt-cli list id
2013 Jun 07
1
Strange messages after installing Quad-core processor
After installing a Phenom II X4 processor (replacing a single core Semperon) I am getting these messages on the console and in dmesg: Warning Timer ISR/2: Time went backwards: delta=-250135996 delta_cpu=13864004 shadow=1355887856733 off=870052783 processed=1357008044419 cpu_processed=1356744044419 0: 1357004044419 1: 1356696044419 2: 1356744044419 3: 1356696044419 printk: 41 messages
2013 Mar 20
1
Ctrl-Alt-F? bindings broken under xen 3.0.3-142.el5_9.1 / 2.6.18-348.1.1.el5xen?
I am not sure what I did, but for some reason Ctrl-Alt-F? bindings are broken on 64-bit xen desktop machine (but not on my laptop (32-bit, no xen)). Both machines are (mostly) up-to-date and running CentOS 5.9. I rarely hop to different Virtual Consoles (eg Ctrl-Alt-F1 ... Ctrl-Alt-F7), but today I wanted to go to the main console to watch some kernel verbage (I was checking something with
2017 Sep 21
0
CentOS 7, samba-4.4.4-14.el7_3 and openldap-2.4.40-13.el7 -- file permissions?
I am setting up Samba on a standalone CentOS 7 server (using LDAP with openldap for authentifcation) and things and somewhat working. There is a bit of weirdness though. smbclient is only able to access *directories* and not any of the files. Why is that? What am I missing? Here is a log of a test run: [heller at c764guest: ~]$ ls -lZAn total 8424 -rw-------. 1
2015 Feb 15
1
Updated Spam Assassin for CentOS 5...
At Sun, 15 Feb 2015 07:47:29 -0700 CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org> wrote: > > I have these available: > > http://mirrors.axint.net/repos/axis/x86_64/spamassassin-3.4.0-1.x86_64.rpm > http://mirrors.axint.net/repos/axis-source/spamassassin-3.4.0-1.src.rpm Thanks, I'll have a look. Is this a repo and is there repo metadata files available (eg something I can
2016 Feb 15
0
USB Serial ports (ttyACMn) CentOS 6.7 (64-bit) vs. CentOS 6.7 (64-bit)
At Sun, 14 Feb 2016 19:20:48 -0500 Robert Heller <heller at deepsoft.com> wrote: > > At Mon, 15 Feb 2016 09:41:32 +1100 CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org> wrote: > > > > > On 14/02/16 02:14, Robert Heller wrote: > > > I sent this out about a week or so ago, but I have heard nothing. I am > > > *thinking* it is a SELINUX problem, but I
2016 Feb 15
2
USB Serial ports (ttyACMn) CentOS 6.7 (64-bit) vs. CentOS 6.7 (64-bit)
I have not yet found a USB-to-serial adapter detected as /dev/ttyACM1. Try /dev/ttyUSB0 ? - Mike On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 10:14 AM, Robert Heller <heller at deepsoft.com> wrote: > I sent this out about a week or so ago, but I have heard nothing. I am > *thinking* it is a SELINUX problem, but I cannot figure out what. The > SELINUX > settings for both machines are *exactly* the
2016 Feb 13
0
USB Serial ports (ttyACMn) CentOS 6.7 (64-bit) vs. CentOS 6.7 (64-bit)
I sent this out about a week or so ago, but I have heard nothing. I am *thinking* it is a SELINUX problem, but I cannot figure out what. The SELINUX settings for both machines are *exactly* the same (the stock defaults for a standard CentOS 6 install). The *only* difference is that the desktop (sauron) has a few VMs setup (under KVM) and the laptop (gollum) does not. The desktop has an AMD
2016 Feb 13
1
USB Serial ports (ttyACMn) CentOS 6.7 (64-bit) vs. CentOS 6.7 (64-bit)
At Sat, 13 Feb 2016 10:14:30 -0500 CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org> wrote: > > I sent this out about a week or so ago, but I have heard nothing. I am > *thinking* it is a SELINUX problem, but I cannot figure out what. The SELINUX > settings for both machines are *exactly* the same (the stock defaults for a > standard CentOS 6 install). The *only* difference is
2018 Jun 25
0
NetworkManager updating resolv.cfg
Hi, It will be bug on &.2 but we are facing this issue on CentOS 6.8. In 6.8 also has this issue? Please suggest. Regards, Shagun -----Original Message----- From: CentOS [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of centos-request at centos.org Sent: Friday, June 22, 2018 5:30 PM To: centos at centos.org Subject: [EXTERNAL] CentOS Digest, Vol 161, Issue 22 Send CentOS mailing list
2013 Jun 07
1
Can someone explain this?
Installed version of doxygen (stock CentOS 5.9): Name : doxygen Relocations: (not relocatable) Version : 1.4.7 Vendor: CentOS Release : 2 Build Date: Mon 11 Jun 2012 04:50:22 AM EDT Install Date: Fri 07 Jun 2013 12:14:55 PM EDT Build Host: builder10.centos.org Group : Development/Tools
2011 Oct 28
2
Bug#646917: [Virtual-pkg-base-maintainers] Bug#646917: base: Debian gets unresponsive on higher IO load - BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 61s
reassign 646917 xen thanks -- .''`. Sell Crazy Someplace Else. We're all stocked up here : :' : `. `' `- Proudly running Debian GNU/Linux