Hi,
It will be bug on &.2 but we are facing this issue on CentOS 6.8.
In 6.8 also has this issue?
Please suggest.
Regards,
Shagun
-----Original Message-----
From: CentOS [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of centos-request
at centos.org
Sent: Friday, June 22, 2018 5:30 PM
To: centos at centos.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] CentOS Digest, Vol 161, Issue 22
Send CentOS mailing list submissions to
centos at centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://clicktime.symantec.com/a/1/GaRh-9mT7pT2BGk25Szya6j4lyfBTXokdCA6hocGAkM=?d=jdUOEa0ursy6vviA72Wp9CQyzmNZP0ZhevOrPVBV93kfSdUe78CIUBKVVt6xyIm5Y6SyitPu2KPA0ZGPNr5i96qIZELuM-zDuX-IcuPAbZtv9AIDkJ5sr21UTb0PjQLFAB288PhGEyycPWXt6EcXQP4v75ttvql-G_l869C_llOrrtHDCxvG5N4tEBkTHwMA0Y2NdN16Xz3TyRWMbTpUywmcFKgiWH39hDRz50bU4bEX5OoEqu5GwbkgYVm0wClHPhkWTB6s2ljnB-_WaTuJTIyAqE92od3J9izxcFd-XfdbM8iNC4zZhyaL9UZinHIkddJdNI0zq8RFZXXiXP90NcKqdy9-sKPHjq12lAdprOZoFtvUCIJXX3NKhw%3D%3D&u=https%3A%2F%2Flists.centos.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fcentos
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-request at centos.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
centos-owner at centos.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than
"Re: Contents of CentOS digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Specifying different options for different " smb" type
gvfs mount (John Hodrien)
2. Re: NetworkManager updating resolv.cfg (peter.winterflood)
3. Re: Updated krb5 rpm package altered existing krb5.conf - No
go (G?tz Reinicke)
4. Re: CentOS-6.9 Bind-9.8.2 error messages (James B. Byrne)
5. Imap daemons for CentOS 6 (other then cyrus-imapd) (Robert Heller)
6. Re: Imap daemons for CentOS 6 (other then cyrus-imapd)
(James (CentOS ML))
7. Re: Imap daemons for CentOS 6 (other then cyrus-imapd) (Frank Cox)
8. Re: Imap daemons for CentOS 6 (other then cyrus-imapd) (Walter H.)
9. Re: Imap daemons for CentOS 6 (other then cyrus-imapd)
(Jonathan Billings)
10. Re: Specifying different options for different " smb" type
gvfs mount (Gordon Messmer)
11. Re: Imap daemons for CentOS 6 (other then cyrus-imapd)
(Robert Heller)
12. Re: Imap daemons for CentOS 6 (other then cyrus-imapd)
(Valeri Galtsev)
13. Re: Imap daemons for CentOS 6 (other then cyrus-imapd)
(Marcelo Ricardo Leitner)
14. Re: Imap daemons for CentOS 6 (other then cyrus-imapd)
(Valeri Galtsev)
15. Re: Imap daemons for CentOS 6 (other then cyrus-imapd)
(Jonathan Billings)
16. Re: Specifying different options for different " smb" type
gvfs mount (John Hodrien)
17. Re: Imap daemons for CentOS 6 (other then cyrus-imapd) (Walter H.)
18. Re: Imap daemons for CentOS 6 (other then cyrus-imapd) (Walter H.)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 13:09:38 +0100 (BST)
From: John Hodrien <J.H.Hodrien at leeds.ac.uk>
To: CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org>
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Specifying different options for different "
smb" type gvfs mount
Message-ID:
<nycvar.YEU.7.76.1806211308500.31795 at pbzc-cp3201.yrrqf.np.hx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
On Thu, 21 Jun 2018, Toralf Lund wrote:
> I known that I might use mount.cifs and related "fstab" entries
as an
> alternative, but its password handling seems a lot less convenient.
If you're in an AD environment, you can probably do nicely with mount.cifs:
sec=krb5,multiuser
That way you don't have to deal with usernames/passwords at all.
jh
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 13:14:08 +0100
From: "peter.winterflood" <peter.winterflood at ossi.co.uk>
To: CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org>, anax <anax at
ayni.com>
Subject: Re: [CentOS] NetworkManager updating resolv.cfg
Message-ID:
<16422442280.27db.2b6837a33dad96cb17d193f32630f285 at ossi.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="us-ascii"
On 21 June 2018 12:13:02 "anax" <anax at ayni.com> wrote:
> Hi Shagun
> check your settings of PEERDNS and IPV6_PEERDNS...
>
> suomi
>
> On 06/21/2018 08:33 AM, Maheshwari, Shagun wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am facing issue stoping NetworkManager to update resolv.cfg, I am
>> using below configuration for eth0 interface:
>>
>> TYPE=Ethernet
>> BOOTPROTO=dhcp
>> DEFROUTE=yes
>> IPV4_FAILURE_FATAL=no
>> IPV6INIT=yes
>> IPV6_AUTOCONF=yes
>> IPV6_DEFROUTE=yes
>> IPV6_FAILURE_FATAL=no
>> IPV6_ADDR_GEN_MODE=stable-privacy
>> NAME=eth0
>> UUID=93b90a46-dab5-4a67-8fd0-fefe8874a8b9
>> DEVICE=eth0
>> ONBOOT=no
>> PEERDNS=no
>> PEERROUTES=yes
>> IPV6_PEERDNS=yes
>> IPV6_PEERROUTES=yes
>> DNS1=<ipv4 address>
>> DNS2=<ipv6 address>
>>
>>
>> Also, added dns=none in NetworkManager.conf file.
>>
>> Whenever I am restarting NetworkManager, resolv.cfg gets updated and
>> only
>> ipv4 nameserver is displaced, whether I am expecting both the ips
>> (ipv6 and
>> ipv4 address to be present in resolv.cfg file.
>>
>> Any suggestion here, how to achieve that??
>>
>> Regards,
>> Shagun
>> _______________________________________________
>> CentOS mailing list
>> CentOS at centos.org
>> https://clicktime.symantec.com/a/1/GaRh-9mT7pT2BGk25Szya6j4lyfBTXokdC
>> A6hocGAkM=?d=jdUOEa0ursy6vviA72Wp9CQyzmNZP0ZhevOrPVBV93kfSdUe78CIUBKV
>> Vt6xyIm5Y6SyitPu2KPA0ZGPNr5i96qIZELuM-zDuX-IcuPAbZtv9AIDkJ5sr21UTb0Pj
>> QLFAB288PhGEyycPWXt6EcXQP4v75ttvql-G_l869C_llOrrtHDCxvG5N4tEBkTHwMA0Y
>> 2NdN16Xz3TyRWMbTpUywmcFKgiWH39hDRz50bU4bEX5OoEqu5GwbkgYVm0wClHPhkWTB6
>> s2ljnB-_WaTuJTIyAqE92od3J9izxcFd-XfdbM8iNC4zZhyaL9UZinHIkddJdNI0zq8RF
>>
ZXXiXP90NcKqdy9-sKPHjq12lAdprOZoFtvUCIJXX3NKhw%3D%3D&u=https%3A%2F%2F
>> lists.centos.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fcentos
>>
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS at centos.org
> https://clicktime.symantec.com/a/1/GaRh-9mT7pT2BGk25Szya6j4lyfBTXokdCA
> 6hocGAkM=?d=jdUOEa0ursy6vviA72Wp9CQyzmNZP0ZhevOrPVBV93kfSdUe78CIUBKVVt
> 6xyIm5Y6SyitPu2KPA0ZGPNr5i96qIZELuM-zDuX-IcuPAbZtv9AIDkJ5sr21UTb0PjQLF
> AB288PhGEyycPWXt6EcXQP4v75ttvql-G_l869C_llOrrtHDCxvG5N4tEBkTHwMA0Y2NdN
> 16Xz3TyRWMbTpUywmcFKgiWH39hDRz50bU4bEX5OoEqu5GwbkgYVm0wClHPhkWTB6s2ljn
> B-_WaTuJTIyAqE92od3J9izxcFd-XfdbM8iNC4zZhyaL9UZinHIkddJdNI0zq8RFZXXiXP
> 90NcKqdy9-sKPHjq12lAdprOZoFtvUCIJXX3NKhw%3D%3D&u=https%3A%2F%2Flists.c
> entos.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fcentos
I think this was a bug in 7.2 have you updated your rpms. Peerdns ignored.
Regards peter
Sent with AquaMail for Android
https://clicktime.symantec.com/a/1/dZe0_kxJdxrnAK4hEWUQEI2odnKSB2kkoxl3VuciC9c=?d=jdUOEa0ursy6vviA72Wp9CQyzmNZP0ZhevOrPVBV93kfSdUe78CIUBKVVt6xyIm5Y6SyitPu2KPA0ZGPNr5i96qIZELuM-zDuX-IcuPAbZtv9AIDkJ5sr21UTb0PjQLFAB288PhGEyycPWXt6EcXQP4v75ttvql-G_l869C_llOrrtHDCxvG5N4tEBkTHwMA0Y2NdN16Xz3TyRWMbTpUywmcFKgiWH39hDRz50bU4bEX5OoEqu5GwbkgYVm0wClHPhkWTB6s2ljnB-_WaTuJTIyAqE92od3J9izxcFd-XfdbM8iNC4zZhyaL9UZinHIkddJdNI0zq8RFZXXiXP90NcKqdy9-sKPHjq12lAdprOZoFtvUCIJXX3NKhw%3D%3D&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.mobisystems.com%2Faqua-mail
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 16:24:04 +0200
From: G?tz Reinicke <goetz.reinicke at filmakademie.de>
To: CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org>
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Updated krb5 rpm package altered existing
krb5.conf - No go
Message-ID: <45ACB559-6295-4269-97EC-7353970C9F6F at filmakademie.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
> Am 18.06.2018 um 16:33 schrieb me at tdiehl.org:
>
> On Mon, 18 Jun 2018, G?tz Reinicke wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>> Am 15.06.2018 um 01:04 schrieb Gordon Messmer <gordon.messmer at
gmail.com>:
>>>
>>> On 06/14/2018 09:30 AM, me at tdiehl.org wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 14 Jun 2018, Richard Grainger wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I looked at the spec file in the source RPM for the
krb5-libs
>>>>> package and it it has the correct %config(noreplace)
directive
>>>>> next to that file in the %files section, so this is
mysterious.
>>>>
>>>> I too can confirm this behavior.
>>>
>>> # rpm -qa krb\* --triggers
>>> triggerun scriptlet (using /bin/sh) -- krb5-libs < 1.15.1-13 if
!
>>> grep -q 'includedir /etc/krb5.conf.d' /etc/krb5.conf ; then
>>> sed -i '1i # Other applications require this directory to
perform
>>> krb5 configuration.\nincludedir /etc/krb5.conf.d/\n'
/etc/krb5.conf
>>> fi
>>>
>>>
>>> Looks like that's the culprit.
>>
>>
>> Good to know, but writing a rpmnew or rpmsave file would be nice to
check against the life used file.
>
> Agreed! IMO this is a packaging bug. Triggers do not drop rpmsave
> files. I suspect the chances of getting Red Hat to fix it are slim to none.
Fixing it would most likely break other things for them.
>
>>
>> The samba people are aware of that problem regarding the include line
and are working on a patch ? the support at SerNet told me.
>
> I agree they are aware of it but I suspect it is a low priority thing
> given they have known about this since 2016-12-29.
>
> I do think it would be relatively easy for SerNet to patch around in
> their paid for rpms. alas I do not have the budget for them. :-(
>
> The bug is available at
> https://clicktime.symantec.com/a/1/VxaZZYzfeWRqqUBqdb5dituD6zJkUGPZLQ4
> oVo5wQHg=?d=jdUOEa0ursy6vviA72Wp9CQyzmNZP0ZhevOrPVBV93kfSdUe78CIUBKVVt
> 6xyIm5Y6SyitPu2KPA0ZGPNr5i96qIZELuM-zDuX-IcuPAbZtv9AIDkJ5sr21UTb0PjQLF
> AB288PhGEyycPWXt6EcXQP4v75ttvql-G_l869C_llOrrtHDCxvG5N4tEBkTHwMA0Y2NdN
> 16Xz3TyRWMbTpUywmcFKgiWH39hDRz50bU4bEX5OoEqu5GwbkgYVm0wClHPhkWTB6s2ljn
> B-_WaTuJTIyAqE92od3J9izxcFd-XfdbM8iNC4zZhyaL9UZinHIkddJdNI0zq8RFZXXiXP
> 90NcKqdy9-sKPHjq12lAdprOZoFtvUCIJXX3NKhw%3D%3D&u=https%3A%2F%2Fbugzill
> a.samba.org%2Fshow_bug.cgi%3Fid%3D12488
> <https://clicktime.symantec.com/a/1/VxaZZYzfeWRqqUBqdb5dituD6zJkUGPZLQ
> 4oVo5wQHg=?d=jdUOEa0ursy6vviA72Wp9CQyzmNZP0ZhevOrPVBV93kfSdUe78CIUBKVV
> t6xyIm5Y6SyitPu2KPA0ZGPNr5i96qIZELuM-zDuX-IcuPAbZtv9AIDkJ5sr21UTb0PjQL
> FAB288PhGEyycPWXt6EcXQP4v75ttvql-G_l869C_llOrrtHDCxvG5N4tEBkTHwMA0Y2Nd
> N16Xz3TyRWMbTpUywmcFKgiWH39hDRz50bU4bEX5OoEqu5GwbkgYVm0wClHPhkWTB6s2lj
> nB-_WaTuJTIyAqE92od3J9izxcFd-XfdbM8iNC4zZhyaL9UZinHIkddJdNI0zq8RFZXXiX
> P90NcKqdy9-sKPHjq12lAdprOZoFtvUCIJXX3NKhw%3D%3D&u=https%3A%2F%2Fbugzil
> la.samba.org%2Fshow_bug.cgi%3Fid%3D12488>
Patched
https://clicktime.symantec.com/a/1/HFkDaIm7MZYydWwFqssly0lRa9BWoWEEbokgCi9n1t4=?d=jdUOEa0ursy6vviA72Wp9CQyzmNZP0ZhevOrPVBV93kfSdUe78CIUBKVVt6xyIm5Y6SyitPu2KPA0ZGPNr5i96qIZELuM-zDuX-IcuPAbZtv9AIDkJ5sr21UTb0PjQLFAB288PhGEyycPWXt6EcXQP4v75ttvql-G_l869C_llOrrtHDCxvG5N4tEBkTHwMA0Y2NdN16Xz3TyRWMbTpUywmcFKgiWH39hDRz50bU4bEX5OoEqu5GwbkgYVm0wClHPhkWTB6s2ljnB-_WaTuJTIyAqE92od3J9izxcFd-XfdbM8iNC4zZhyaL9UZinHIkddJdNI0zq8RFZXXiXP90NcKqdy9-sKPHjq12lAdprOZoFtvUCIJXX3NKhw%3D%3D&u=https%3A%2F%2Fbugzilla.samba.org%2Fshow_bug.cgi%3Fid%3D11573
<https://clicktime.symantec.com/a/1/HFkDaIm7MZYydWwFqssly0lRa9BWoWEEbokgCi9n1t4=?d=jdUOEa0ursy6vviA72Wp9CQyzmNZP0ZhevOrPVBV93kfSdUe78CIUBKVVt6xyIm5Y6SyitPu2KPA0ZGPNr5i96qIZELuM-zDuX-IcuPAbZtv9AIDkJ5sr21UTb0PjQLFAB288PhGEyycPWXt6EcXQP4v75ttvql-G_l869C_llOrrtHDCxvG5N4tEBkTHwMA0Y2NdN16Xz3TyRWMbTpUywmcFKgiWH39hDRz50bU4bEX5OoEqu5GwbkgYVm0wClHPhkWTB6s2ljnB-_WaTuJTIyAqE92od3J9izxcFd-XfdbM8iNC4zZhyaL9UZinHIkddJdNI0zq8RFZXXiXP90NcKqdy9-sKPHjq12lAdprOZoFtvUCIJXX3NKhw%3D%3D&u=https%3A%2F%2Fbugzilla.samba.org%2Fshow_bug.cgi%3Fid%3D11573>
/G?tz
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 12:31:56 -0400
From: "James B. Byrne" <byrnejb at harte-lyne.ca>
To: "Gordon Messmer" <gordon.messmer at gmail.com>
Cc: centos at centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS-6.9 Bind-9.8.2 error messages
Message-ID:
<2720c48e462a326dad3d716c31325f43.squirrel at webmail.harte-lyne.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
On Wed, June 20, 2018 15:37, Gordon Messmer wrote:> On 06/20/2018 11:19 AM, James B. Byrne via CentOS wrote:
>> I am encountering messages similar to this in the system logfile:
>>
>> Jun 20 13:38:18 inet03 named[3720]: malformed transaction:
>> dynamic/efa1f375d76194fa51a3556a97e641e61685f914d446979da50a551a4333f
>> fd7.mkeys.jnl last serial 103538 != transaction first serial 103361
>>
>> I have no idea what this means, what caused it, nor how to fix it.
>> Any suggestions relevant to any of the above are most welcome.
>>
>
> I think I've seen this before.?? Are you auto-signing a zone for
> DNSSEC,
Yes
> and does that zone appear in multiple views?
No
I stopped and restarted the BIND daemon and this appears to have corrected
whatever issue was causing the errors to be generated.
--
*** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail Do NOT open attachments nor
follow links sent by e-Mail
James B. Byrne mailto:ByrneJB at Harte-Lyne.ca
Harte & Lyne Limited
https://clicktime.symantec.com/a/1/3qm1WpYWfhhR3CL-f_FUJqUD_XpMj733hnnofUT26N8=?d=jdUOEa0ursy6vviA72Wp9CQyzmNZP0ZhevOrPVBV93kfSdUe78CIUBKVVt6xyIm5Y6SyitPu2KPA0ZGPNr5i96qIZELuM-zDuX-IcuPAbZtv9AIDkJ5sr21UTb0PjQLFAB288PhGEyycPWXt6EcXQP4v75ttvql-G_l869C_llOrrtHDCxvG5N4tEBkTHwMA0Y2NdN16Xz3TyRWMbTpUywmcFKgiWH39hDRz50bU4bEX5OoEqu5GwbkgYVm0wClHPhkWTB6s2ljnB-_WaTuJTIyAqE92od3J9izxcFd-XfdbM8iNC4zZhyaL9UZinHIkddJdNI0zq8RFZXXiXP90NcKqdy9-sKPHjq12lAdprOZoFtvUCIJXX3NKhw%3D%3D&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757
Canada L8E 3C3
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 13:28:38 -0400 (EDT)
From: Robert Heller <heller at deepsoft.com>
To: centos at centos.org <centos at centos.org>
Subject: [CentOS] Imap daemons for CentOS 6 (other then cyrus-imapd)
Message-ID: <20180621172838.D768226C2619 at sharky3.deepsoft.com>
Are there any imap daemons (besides cyrus-imapd). cyrus-imapd is appearently
not compatible with postfix + procmail. I need an imap daemon that will work
with a postfix + procmail system.
--
Robert Heller -- 978-544-6933
Deepwoods Software -- Custom Software Services
https://clicktime.symantec.com/a/1/eGcBdmqkFYbaGxldXqPflUsBamhj9GghI-bEbhZqZgk=?d=jdUOEa0ursy6vviA72Wp9CQyzmNZP0ZhevOrPVBV93kfSdUe78CIUBKVVt6xyIm5Y6SyitPu2KPA0ZGPNr5i96qIZELuM-zDuX-IcuPAbZtv9AIDkJ5sr21UTb0PjQLFAB288PhGEyycPWXt6EcXQP4v75ttvql-G_l869C_llOrrtHDCxvG5N4tEBkTHwMA0Y2NdN16Xz3TyRWMbTpUywmcFKgiWH39hDRz50bU4bEX5OoEqu5GwbkgYVm0wClHPhkWTB6s2ljnB-_WaTuJTIyAqE92od3J9izxcFd-XfdbM8iNC4zZhyaL9UZinHIkddJdNI0zq8RFZXXiXP90NcKqdy9-sKPHjq12lAdprOZoFtvUCIJXX3NKhw%3D%3D&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.deepsoft.com%2F
-- Linux Administration Services
heller at deepsoft.com -- Webhosting Services
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 13:32:16 -0400
From: "James (CentOS ML)" <centos at edwards.technology>
To: CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org>
Cc: Robert Heller <heller at deepsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Imap daemons for CentOS 6 (other then
cyrus-imapd)
Message-ID: <b979bb1c0e1247e3b3e0b2e0de223952 at edwards.technology>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
On 2018-06-21 13:28, Robert Heller wrote:> Are there any imap daemons (besides cyrus-imapd). cyrus-imapd is
> appearently not compatible with postfix + procmail. I need an imap
> daemon that will work with a postfix + procmail system.
Try dovecot, I use that personally.
There also appears to be good documentation for dovecot+procmail as well
-
https://clicktime.symantec.com/a/1/2p8upgUG3dyM_D-qXYLbNH70qIQuJaYvhV0kviNBFO4=?d=jdUOEa0ursy6vviA72Wp9CQyzmNZP0ZhevOrPVBV93kfSdUe78CIUBKVVt6xyIm5Y6SyitPu2KPA0ZGPNr5i96qIZELuM-zDuX-IcuPAbZtv9AIDkJ5sr21UTb0PjQLFAB288PhGEyycPWXt6EcXQP4v75ttvql-G_l869C_llOrrtHDCxvG5N4tEBkTHwMA0Y2NdN16Xz3TyRWMbTpUywmcFKgiWH39hDRz50bU4bEX5OoEqu5GwbkgYVm0wClHPhkWTB6s2ljnB-_WaTuJTIyAqE92od3J9izxcFd-XfdbM8iNC4zZhyaL9UZinHIkddJdNI0zq8RFZXXiXP90NcKqdy9-sKPHjq12lAdprOZoFtvUCIJXX3NKhw%3D%3D&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwiki.dovecot.org%2Fprocmail
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 11:34:18 -0600
From: Frank Cox <theatre at sasktel.net>
To: centos at centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Imap daemons for CentOS 6 (other then
cyrus-imapd)
Message-ID: <20180621113418.d7bd532565881109733f561e at sasktel.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
On Thu, 21 Jun 2018 13:28:38 -0400 (EDT)
Robert Heller wrote:
> Are there any imap daemons (besides cyrus-imapd). cyrus-imapd is
appearently
> not compatible with postfix + procmail. I need an imap daemon that will
work
> with a postfix + procmail system.
I use dovecot with postfix and procmail; works fine.
--
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Real D 3D Digital Cinema ~ www.melvilletheatre.com
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 20:42:50 +0200
From: "Walter H." <Walter.H at mathemainzel.info>
To: centos at centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Imap daemons for CentOS 6 (other then
cyrus-imapd)
Message-ID: <5B2BF1AA.5030007 at mathemainzel.info>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
On 21.06.2018 19:28, Robert Heller wrote:> Are there any imap daemons (besides cyrus-imapd). cyrus-imapd is
appearently
> not compatible with postfix + procmail. I need an imap daemon that will
work
> with a postfix + procmail system.
>
the problem seems to be procmail, I use postfix and cyrus-imapd with no
problems;
------------------------------
Message: 9
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 14:49:09 -0400
From: Jonathan Billings <billings at negate.org>
To: centos at centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Imap daemons for CentOS 6 (other then
cyrus-imapd)
Message-ID: <20180621184909.GE1693 at caen-tethys.engin.umich.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 01:28:38PM -0400, Robert Heller
wrote:>
> Are there any imap daemons (besides cyrus-imapd). cyrus-imapd is
> appearently not compatible with postfix + procmail. I need an imap
> daemon that will work with a postfix + procmail system.
I suggest dovecot if you don't want to deal with Cyrus IMAP, but I can
tell you from first-hand experience that you used to be able to use
procmail to deliver to Cyrus IMAP, using 'deliver'.
However, if you get postfix to deliver directly via lmtp, you can take
advantage of SIEVE to filter your mail, which is quite powerful. (I
miss it, work migrated to Google Apps and its filters are subpar.)
--
Jonathan Billings <billings at negate.org>
------------------------------
Message: 10
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 13:03:03 -0700
From: Gordon Messmer <gordon.messmer at gmail.com>
To: centos at centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Specifying different options for different "
smb" type gvfs mount
Message-ID: <b038b2e3-4f15-6890-3264-f11ca1136b88 at gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
On 06/21/2018 05:09 AM, John Hodrien wrote:> On Thu, 21 Jun 2018, Toralf Lund wrote:
>
>> I known that I might use mount.cifs and related "fstab"
entries as an
>> alternative, but its password handling seems a lot less convenient.
>
> If you're in an AD environment, you can probably do nicely with
> mount.cifs:
> sec=krb5,multiuser
> That way you don't have to deal with usernames/passwords at all.
Interesting.? Seems like a lot of setup, but it's interesting.? I didn't
know SMB supported this:
https://clicktime.symantec.com/a/1/C-MtUYKskiDqrOo6AjZ3TiEoE538EEMOIEdNoqihIvw=?d=jdUOEa0ursy6vviA72Wp9CQyzmNZP0ZhevOrPVBV93kfSdUe78CIUBKVVt6xyIm5Y6SyitPu2KPA0ZGPNr5i96qIZELuM-zDuX-IcuPAbZtv9AIDkJ5sr21UTb0PjQLFAB288PhGEyycPWXt6EcXQP4v75ttvql-G_l869C_llOrrtHDCxvG5N4tEBkTHwMA0Y2NdN16Xz3TyRWMbTpUywmcFKgiWH39hDRz50bU4bEX5OoEqu5GwbkgYVm0wClHPhkWTB6s2ljnB-_WaTuJTIyAqE92od3J9izxcFd-XfdbM8iNC4zZhyaL9UZinHIkddJdNI0zq8RFZXXiXP90NcKqdy9-sKPHjq12lAdprOZoFtvUCIJXX3NKhw%3D%3D&u=https%3A%2F%2Faccess.redhat.com%2Fsolutions%2F279183
------------------------------
Message: 11
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 17:23:31 -0400 (EDT)
From: Robert Heller <heller at deepsoft.com>
To: CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org>
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Imap daemons for CentOS 6 (other then
cyrus-imapd)
Message-ID: <20180621212332.3ECAA26C288A at sharky3.deepsoft.com>
At Thu, 21 Jun 2018 20:42:50 +0200 CentOS mailing list <centos at
centos.org> wrote:
>
> On 21.06.2018 19:28, Robert Heller wrote:
> > Are there any imap daemons (besides cyrus-imapd). cyrus-imapd is
appearently
> > not compatible with postfix + procmail. I need an imap daemon that
will work
> > with a postfix + procmail system.
> >
> the problem seems to be procmail, I use postfix and cyrus-imapd with no
> problems;
No actually the problem is cyrus-imapd: cyrus-imapd expects all users to use
imap (or pop3) to access their E-Mail. It does not allow for other E-Mail
methodologies, including using local UNIX utilies (eg mail or pine or mh or
other tools like QWK).
I have uninstalled cyrus-imapd and installed dovecot instead. This actually
works. dovecot is even happy to use a Let's Encrypt cert for SSL.
>
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS at centos.org
>
https://clicktime.symantec.com/a/1/GaRh-9mT7pT2BGk25Szya6j4lyfBTXokdCA6hocGAkM=?d=jdUOEa0ursy6vviA72Wp9CQyzmNZP0ZhevOrPVBV93kfSdUe78CIUBKVVt6xyIm5Y6SyitPu2KPA0ZGPNr5i96qIZELuM-zDuX-IcuPAbZtv9AIDkJ5sr21UTb0PjQLFAB288PhGEyycPWXt6EcXQP4v75ttvql-G_l869C_llOrrtHDCxvG5N4tEBkTHwMA0Y2NdN16Xz3TyRWMbTpUywmcFKgiWH39hDRz50bU4bEX5OoEqu5GwbkgYVm0wClHPhkWTB6s2ljnB-_WaTuJTIyAqE92od3J9izxcFd-XfdbM8iNC4zZhyaL9UZinHIkddJdNI0zq8RFZXXiXP90NcKqdy9-sKPHjq12lAdprOZoFtvUCIJXX3NKhw%3D%3D&u=https%3A%2F%2Flists.centos.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fcentos
>
>
--
Robert Heller -- 978-544-6933
Deepwoods Software -- Custom Software Services
https://clicktime.symantec.com/a/1/eGcBdmqkFYbaGxldXqPflUsBamhj9GghI-bEbhZqZgk=?d=jdUOEa0ursy6vviA72Wp9CQyzmNZP0ZhevOrPVBV93kfSdUe78CIUBKVVt6xyIm5Y6SyitPu2KPA0ZGPNr5i96qIZELuM-zDuX-IcuPAbZtv9AIDkJ5sr21UTb0PjQLFAB288PhGEyycPWXt6EcXQP4v75ttvql-G_l869C_llOrrtHDCxvG5N4tEBkTHwMA0Y2NdN16Xz3TyRWMbTpUywmcFKgiWH39hDRz50bU4bEX5OoEqu5GwbkgYVm0wClHPhkWTB6s2ljnB-_WaTuJTIyAqE92od3J9izxcFd-XfdbM8iNC4zZhyaL9UZinHIkddJdNI0zq8RFZXXiXP90NcKqdy9-sKPHjq12lAdprOZoFtvUCIJXX3NKhw%3D%3D&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.deepsoft.com%2F
-- Linux Administration Services
heller at deepsoft.com -- Webhosting Services
------------------------------
Message: 12
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 16:29:29 -0500
From: Valeri Galtsev <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu>
To: centos at centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Imap daemons for CentOS 6 (other then
cyrus-imapd)
Message-ID: <aa9ec9d3-e762-3c2b-91ba-ea50e7b9ded9 at kicp.uchicago.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
On 06/21/18 16:23, Robert Heller wrote:> At Thu, 21 Jun 2018 20:42:50 +0200 CentOS mailing list <centos at
centos.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 21.06.2018 19:28, Robert Heller wrote:
>>> Are there any imap daemons (besides cyrus-imapd). cyrus-imapd is
appearently
>>> not compatible with postfix + procmail. I need an imap daemon that
will work
>>> with a postfix + procmail system.
>>>
>> the problem seems to be procmail, I use postfix and cyrus-imapd with no
>> problems;
>
> No actually the problem is cyrus-imapd: cyrus-imapd expects all users to
use
> imap (or pop3) to access their E-Mail. It does not allow for other E-Mail
> methodologies, including using local UNIX utilies (eg mail or pine or mh or
> other tools like QWK).
>
> I have uninstalled cyrus-imapd and installed dovecot instead. This
actually
> works. dovecot is even happy to use a Let's Encrypt cert for SSL.
I use postfix + dovecot since forever. I recently switched from
amavisd-new to maia. It probably is same simple on Linux as it is on
FreeBSD - I have servers under FreeBSD (or rather multiple jails on
FreeBSD box).
Good luck!
Valeri
>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CentOS mailing list
>> CentOS at centos.org
>>
https://clicktime.symantec.com/a/1/GaRh-9mT7pT2BGk25Szya6j4lyfBTXokdCA6hocGAkM=?d=jdUOEa0ursy6vviA72Wp9CQyzmNZP0ZhevOrPVBV93kfSdUe78CIUBKVVt6xyIm5Y6SyitPu2KPA0ZGPNr5i96qIZELuM-zDuX-IcuPAbZtv9AIDkJ5sr21UTb0PjQLFAB288PhGEyycPWXt6EcXQP4v75ttvql-G_l869C_llOrrtHDCxvG5N4tEBkTHwMA0Y2NdN16Xz3TyRWMbTpUywmcFKgiWH39hDRz50bU4bEX5OoEqu5GwbkgYVm0wClHPhkWTB6s2ljnB-_WaTuJTIyAqE92od3J9izxcFd-XfdbM8iNC4zZhyaL9UZinHIkddJdNI0zq8RFZXXiXP90NcKqdy9-sKPHjq12lAdprOZoFtvUCIJXX3NKhw%3D%3D&u=https%3A%2F%2Flists.centos.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fcentos
>>
>>
>
--
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Valeri Galtsev
Sr System Administrator
Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics
Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics
University of Chicago
Phone: 773-702-4247
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
------------------------------
Message: 13
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 18:46:01 -0300
From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner at gmail.com>
To: CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org>
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Imap daemons for CentOS 6 (other then
cyrus-imapd)
Message-ID: <20180621214559.GA27219 at localhost.localdomain>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 05:23:31PM -0400, Robert Heller
wrote:> At Thu, 21 Jun 2018 20:42:50 +0200 CentOS mailing list <centos at
centos.org> wrote:
>
> >
> > On 21.06.2018 19:28, Robert Heller wrote:
> > > Are there any imap daemons (besides cyrus-imapd). cyrus-imapd is
appearently
> > > not compatible with postfix + procmail. I need an imap daemon
that will work
> > > with a postfix + procmail system.
> > >
> > the problem seems to be procmail, I use postfix and cyrus-imapd with
no
> > problems;
>
> No actually the problem is cyrus-imapd: cyrus-imapd expects all users to
use
> imap (or pop3) to access their E-Mail. It does not allow for other E-Mail
> methodologies, including using local UNIX utilies (eg mail or pine or mh or
> other tools like QWK).
So it's not that postfix + procmail + cyrus doesn't work, but that you
have a requirement that cyrus can't fulfill.
------------------------------
Message: 14
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 16:51:12 -0500
From: Valeri Galtsev <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu>
To: centos at centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Imap daemons for CentOS 6 (other then
cyrus-imapd)
Message-ID: <a82ade4c-4892-0840-970b-184061e686e1 at kicp.uchicago.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
On 06/21/18 16:46, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:> On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 05:23:31PM -0400, Robert Heller wrote:
>> At Thu, 21 Jun 2018 20:42:50 +0200 CentOS mailing list <centos at
centos.org> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On 21.06.2018 19:28, Robert Heller wrote:
>>>> Are there any imap daemons (besides cyrus-imapd). cyrus-imapd
is appearently
>>>> not compatible with postfix + procmail. I need an imap daemon
that will work
>>>> with a postfix + procmail system.
>>>>
>>> the problem seems to be procmail, I use postfix and cyrus-imapd
with no
>>> problems;
>>
>> No actually the problem is cyrus-imapd: cyrus-imapd expects all users
to use
>> imap (or pop3) to access their E-Mail. It does not allow for other
E-Mail
>> methodologies, including using local UNIX utilies (eg mail or pine or
mh or
>> other tools like QWK).
Just a bit of correction. Pine (which is so old, alpine replaced it) or
alpine you can configure to talk through IMAP protocol, then it will not
matter what sort of IMAP server do you have. Just minor correction.
Valeri
>
> So it's not that postfix + procmail + cyrus doesn't work, but that
you
> have a requirement that cyrus can't fulfill.
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS at centos.org
>
https://clicktime.symantec.com/a/1/GaRh-9mT7pT2BGk25Szya6j4lyfBTXokdCA6hocGAkM=?d=jdUOEa0ursy6vviA72Wp9CQyzmNZP0ZhevOrPVBV93kfSdUe78CIUBKVVt6xyIm5Y6SyitPu2KPA0ZGPNr5i96qIZELuM-zDuX-IcuPAbZtv9AIDkJ5sr21UTb0PjQLFAB288PhGEyycPWXt6EcXQP4v75ttvql-G_l869C_llOrrtHDCxvG5N4tEBkTHwMA0Y2NdN16Xz3TyRWMbTpUywmcFKgiWH39hDRz50bU4bEX5OoEqu5GwbkgYVm0wClHPhkWTB6s2ljnB-_WaTuJTIyAqE92od3J9izxcFd-XfdbM8iNC4zZhyaL9UZinHIkddJdNI0zq8RFZXXiXP90NcKqdy9-sKPHjq12lAdprOZoFtvUCIJXX3NKhw%3D%3D&u=https%3A%2F%2Flists.centos.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fcentos
>
--
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Valeri Galtsev
Sr System Administrator
Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics
Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics
University of Chicago
Phone: 773-702-4247
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
------------------------------
Message: 15
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 17:51:39 -0400
From: Jonathan Billings <billings at negate.org>
To: centos at centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Imap daemons for CentOS 6 (other then
cyrus-imapd)
Message-ID: <20180621215139.dzzq57snoncik746 at raspi3>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 05:23:31PM -0400, Robert Heller
wrote:> No actually the problem is cyrus-imapd: cyrus-imapd expects all users to
use
> imap (or pop3) to access their E-Mail. It does not allow for other E-Mail
> methodologies, including using local UNIX utilies (eg mail or pine or mh or
> other tools like QWK).
I suppose it shouldn't be a huge surprise that an IMAP server expects
you to use IMAP. The backend uses its own files in a manner that is
optimised for running IMAP, which improves performance and load on the
server.
If you're using dovecot, at least try to avoid using mbox format, due
to how terrible it is for performance.
--
Jonathan Billings <billings at negate.org>
------------------------------
Message: 16
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2018 09:24:53 +0100 (BST)
From: John Hodrien <J.H.Hodrien at leeds.ac.uk>
To: CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org>
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Specifying different options for different "
smb" type gvfs mount
Message-ID:
<nycvar.YEU.7.76.1806220912370.31795 at pbzc-cp3201.yrrqf.np.hx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
On Thu, 21 Jun 2018, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 06/21/2018 05:09 AM, John Hodrien wrote:
>> On Thu, 21 Jun 2018, Toralf Lund wrote:
>>
>>> I known that I might use mount.cifs and related "fstab"
entries as an
>>> alternative, but its password handling seems a lot less
convenient.
>>
>> If you're in an AD environment, you can probably do nicely with
>> mount.cifs:
>> sec=krb5,multiuser
>> That way you don't have to deal with usernames/passwords at all.
>
> Interesting.? Seems like a lot of setup, but it's interesting.? I
didn't know
> SMB supported this:
>
>
https://clicktime.symantec.com/a/1/C-MtUYKskiDqrOo6AjZ3TiEoE538EEMOIEdNoqihIvw=?d=jdUOEa0ursy6vviA72Wp9CQyzmNZP0ZhevOrPVBV93kfSdUe78CIUBKVVt6xyIm5Y6SyitPu2KPA0ZGPNr5i96qIZELuM-zDuX-IcuPAbZtv9AIDkJ5sr21UTb0PjQLFAB288PhGEyycPWXt6EcXQP4v75ttvql-G_l869C_llOrrtHDCxvG5N4tEBkTHwMA0Y2NdN16Xz3TyRWMbTpUywmcFKgiWH39hDRz50bU4bEX5OoEqu5GwbkgYVm0wClHPhkWTB6s2ljnB-_WaTuJTIyAqE92od3J9izxcFd-XfdbM8iNC4zZhyaL9UZinHIkddJdNI0zq8RFZXXiXP90NcKqdy9-sKPHjq12lAdprOZoFtvUCIJXX3NKhw%3D%3D&u=https%3A%2F%2Faccess.redhat.com%2Fsolutions%2F279183
That article makes it sound a whole lot harder than it is, as almost all of
that is pre done in later versions of CentOS.
You don't have to configure the upcall stuff as it's already done, you
don't
need to generate a credential cache for root as it can just use the keytab,
and if you've already setup a machine to talk to AD with SSSD you've
probably
done everything else.
Paired with wildcard automount entries, and you end up in a very usable setup
with minimal config.
jh
------------------------------
Message: 17
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2018 10:31:45 +0200
From: "Walter H." <walter.h at mathemainzel.info>
To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos at centos.org>
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Imap daemons for CentOS 6 (other then
cyrus-imapd)
Message-ID:
<bac82dd69b099fc5dc37c0766f5b4a95.1529656305 at squirrel.mail>
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=utf-8
On Thu, June 21, 2018 23:23, Robert Heller wrote:> At Thu, 21 Jun 2018 20:42:50 +0200 CentOS mailing list <centos at
centos.org>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 21.06.2018 19:28, Robert Heller wrote:
>> > Are there any imap daemons (besides cyrus-imapd). cyrus-imapd is
>> appearently
>> > not compatible with postfix + procmail. I need an imap daemon
that
>> will work
>> > with a postfix + procmail system.
>> >
>> the problem seems to be procmail, I use postfix and cyrus-imapd with no
>> problems;
>
> No actually the problem is cyrus-imapd: cyrus-imapd expects all users to
> use
> imap (or pop3) to access their E-Mail.
of course, what else do you expect?
(SSL is not the problem, as I'm using cyrus-imapd with SSL)
Walter
------------------------------
Message: 18
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2018 10:43:20 +0200
From: "Walter H." <walter.h at mathemainzel.info>
To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos at centos.org>
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Imap daemons for CentOS 6 (other then
cyrus-imapd)
Message-ID:
<841a958996ff749537ac6f066a6b1283.1529657000 at squirrel.mail>
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=utf-8
On Thu, June 21, 2018 23:23, Robert Heller wrote:> At Thu, 21 Jun 2018 20:42:50 +0200 CentOS mailing list
<centos at centos.org> wrote:>
>>
>> On 21.06.2018 19:28, Robert Heller wrote:
>> > Are there any imap daemons (besides cyrus-imapd). cyrus-imapd is
>> appearently
>> > not compatible with postfix + procmail. I need an imap daemon
that
>> will work
>> > with a postfix + procmail system.
>> >
>> the problem seems to be procmail, I use postfix and cyrus-imapd with no
problems;>
> No actually the problem is cyrus-imapd: cyrus-imapd expects all users to
use> imap (or pop3) to access their E-Mail.
of course, what else do you expect?
(SSL is not the problem, as I'm using cyrus-imapd with SSL)
here my settings in /etc/imapd.conf
tls_cert_file: /etc/pki/cyrus-imapd/tls.crt/mail-host.crt
tls_key_file: /etc/pki/cyrus-imapd/tls.key/mail-host.key
tls_ca_file: /etc/pki/cyrus-imapd/tls.crt/server-chain-sslca.crt
tls_cipher_list:
EECDH+ECDSA+AESGCM:EECDH+aRSA+AESGCM:EECDH+ECDSA:EECDH:EDH+AESGCM:EDH:ECDH+AESGCM:ECDH+AES:ECDH:AES:HIGH:MEDIUM:3DES:!SSLv2:+SSLv3:!RC4:!MD5:!IDEA:!SEED:!aNULL:!eNULL:!LOW:!EXP:!DSS:!PSK:!SRP
tls_prefer_server_ciphers: 1
tls_versions: tls1_0 tls1_1 tls1_2
Walter
------------------------------
Subject: Digest Footer
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS at centos.org
https://clicktime.symantec.com/a/1/GaRh-9mT7pT2BGk25Szya6j4lyfBTXokdCA6hocGAkM=?d=jdUOEa0ursy6vviA72Wp9CQyzmNZP0ZhevOrPVBV93kfSdUe78CIUBKVVt6xyIm5Y6SyitPu2KPA0ZGPNr5i96qIZELuM-zDuX-IcuPAbZtv9AIDkJ5sr21UTb0PjQLFAB288PhGEyycPWXt6EcXQP4v75ttvql-G_l869C_llOrrtHDCxvG5N4tEBkTHwMA0Y2NdN16Xz3TyRWMbTpUywmcFKgiWH39hDRz50bU4bEX5OoEqu5GwbkgYVm0wClHPhkWTB6s2ljnB-_WaTuJTIyAqE92od3J9izxcFd-XfdbM8iNC4zZhyaL9UZinHIkddJdNI0zq8RFZXXiXP90NcKqdy9-sKPHjq12lAdprOZoFtvUCIJXX3NKhw%3D%3D&u=https%3A%2F%2Flists.centos.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fcentos
------------------------------
End of CentOS Digest, Vol 161, Issue 22
***************************************
