similar to: Re: Rails-spinoffs Digest, Vol 4, Issue 21

Hey all, We (http://www.weblinc.com) just launched a new site in which I have used the scriptaculous library in a few places. check out http://www.smashbox.com scriptaculous was used in creating the zoom controls on the product detail pages, and was also used with the sliding paginator on the product browse pages (some serious reworking is in progress on that, but it works). its also being

Hey I got a question regarding sortables. I can drag and drop the items on a page to different locations. But when I refresh the page the contraols are goin to their inital positions. Is there any way that I can make them stay in their new positions even after post back (refresh)??? Thank you. On 11/11/05, rails-spinoffs-request@lists.rubyonrails.org <

Issue 1: <%= @pic %> instead of <% @pic %> -----Original Message----- From: rails-spinoffs-bounces-1W37MKcQCpIf0INCOvqR/iCwEArCW2h5@public.gmane.org [mailto:rails-spinoffs-bounces-1W37MKcQCpIf0INCOvqR/iCwEArCW2h5@public.gmane.org] On Behalf Of rails-spinoffs-request-1W37MKcQCpIf0INCOvqR/iCwEArCW2h5@public.gmane.org Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 11:13 PM To:

Is anyone working on a scrolling table or div such as the openrico livegrid demo? I''m looking to develop (much like smashbox''s scrolling images) a collection of thumbnails that you can scroll horizontally. I''ve got a non-prototype.js example but I wanted to check to see if anyone was closer than I to this. BTW, I will be finishing up my slider code shortly and

I saw a Flash-based photo-flipper on TagWorld ( http://www.tagworld.com/thepostalservice) and thought it would be nice to do something similar in Scripaculous. Anyone interested in taking a shot at it? Since rotation isn''t supported in CSS, what I would imagine would be a z-ordered "stack" of DIVs, possibly of slightly different sizes or just x/y-offset a bit from each other.

Hi list, So, some hard work today, but the Wiki is quickly taking shape. I''ve now moved all the documentation I could find into it. The URL again: http://wiki.script.aculo.us/ There are also some new features in there, like: FAQ: http://wiki.script.aculo.us/scriptaculous/show/FAQ Wishlist (moved from Rails wiki): http://wiki.script.aculo.us/ scriptaculous/show/TheWishlist And the

I just ran into this very problem myself. Yes, this is a bug in prototype. If you look in the code you will see that the relevent handlers and callbacks simply aren''t called with a synchronous request (onComplete is similarly not called). I submitted a patch <http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/4657> over at dev.rubyonrails.org which fixes this behavior. If you decide to check it

For removing or changing a given element, these two functions (from the element object) seem the business remove: function(element) { Element = $(element); Element.parentNode.removeChild(element); }, update: function(element, html) { $(Element).innerHTML = html.stripScripts(); setTimeout(function() {html.evalScripts()}, 10); }, Thanks to everybody for responding,

has anyone checked out : http://moofx.mad4milk.net/#introduction pretty cool stuff - nothing u can''t do in script.aculo.us, but interesting nevertheless cheers j -- ___________________________________________ Graffiti.net free e-mail @ www.graffiti.net Play 100s of games for FREE! http://games.graffiti.net/ Powered By Outblaze

would it be possible to have a similar edit-in-place moving images and divs about ?

Maybe I''m doing something wrong, but whenever I use the fade/appear methods IE''s rendering engine has a fit. Anything that''s bolded becomes very aliased, and form elements have unusual borders and don''t update properly when set to disabled or not disabled (the element is disabled, but it doesnt appear to be. Once you click on it it updates.) Firefox runs it

Hey, I''ve been using prototype and script.aculo.us quite a bit lately and felt the need for a unit-testing framework. But none of the frameworks I found were simple or graphical. So i created littleUnit. I figured other people here might find it helpful, you can check it out here <a

Hello folks, I have a situation where I''m using both MochiKit and Prototype/Scriptaculous on the same page. Everything works well in Firefox however MochiKit appears to be breaking my Scriptaculous autocomplete in IE 6. I''m currently loading the JavaScript libraries in the following order: prototype.js scriptaculous.js"> <script

Hi ! I'm getting an uncaught exception requiring the Scriptaculous libraries when everything says XHTML 1.0 Strict: class ApplicationController < ActionController::Base before_filter :set_content_type protected def set_content_type response.headers['Content-Type'] = 'application/xhtml+xml; charset=ISO-8859-1' end end <?xml version="1.0"

I''m not a JavaScript guy, so please help me out. It''s my understanding that Rails 1.0 includes scriptaculous-js-1.5.0 But it seems to contain portions of, but not the complete library. Rails 1.0 includes 4 .js files, scriptaculous-js-1.5.0 includes 8. What am I missing? > tmornini$ rails --version > Rails 1.0.0 > > tmornini$ rails test | grep

I''m using TinyMCE[1], a popular javascript WYSIWYG html editor. The editor fails to work when I load Scriptaculous before it -- well depending on the browser. I can make my application load the javascript in a different order, but just in case it''s an issue in scriptaculous I thought I''d report. I have a few pages up -- I''d like to find out if anyone else

|Hi i''m New First Question: to use a script.aculo.us it needs to include prototype.js and scriptaculous.js.... but doesn''t work!!; instead ||using ||scriptaculous.shrunk of Alister Cameron, work; what are the expedient to use to include the ||scriptaculous.js ? Second question: in script.aculo.us |Ajax.Autocompleter

Using older versions of prototype.js (1.4.0_rc2) and scriptaculous (1.5._rc4), I had a master table containg other tables (sections), each of which had rows. Using tbody''s as containers, I could drag the section tables up and down over the other section tables AND drag the rows in a section table up and down within that table or into the rows of the other section tables, all very

Isn''t the difference that the scriptaculous one only gets child nodes from the node you specify, whereas the prototype one gets all in the entire document? Still, it would be nice to just have the one, and let you pass in the document element if you wanted all of them. Just guessing, really. I haven''t looked at the code in question. Greg > -----Original Message----- >

Hi Jonah, I support usability. For a great book on it, read Jakob Nielsen''s "Designing Web Usability: The Practice of Simplicity" and, for a great general book on usability, try "The Design of Everyday Things." You''re right. Drag ''n drop is not the best tool for many things. Unless something offers a 50%+ advantage over an existing method of doing