similar to: Wanted: Winbind idmap backend like in Mac OS X

hi@all i'm using netatalk and samba as fileserver for different clients (OS9,X,WinNT/2K/XP) to create shares, that are visible and accessible for all clients (via afp/smb) i created a folder and made it public in all daemons (atalk, samba) to get a better file handling i'm using the samba feature: vfs object = netatalk but there are still some problems files that are created via afp

hi list, i searched bugzilla but couldn't find an open/fixed bug for my problem: [system] - AMD Opteron 248, 8GB - SuSE 9.1 Prof. x86_64 - Samba v3.0.11-2.1 from ftp.samba.org (ftp://ftp.samba.org/pub/samba/Binary_Packages/SuSE/3.0/x86_64/9.1/) - netatalk v2.0.2 (self compiled) [situation] we're accessing our samba fileserver (files, directories, ... ) from different platforms

I guess I'm sort of surprised and I expected better performance I have a new server set up with RAID 10 drives (6) Repeated a number of times and though I am clumsy with stop watch timing, these numbers appear to be close enough for government work... Server, CentOS 5.2 and updated earlier today, just installed a week ago. Client, Macintosh G4, OS X 10.4.11 NFS Mount is done with the

(This is a brief announcement of a focused development/refinement of the Netatalk project.) The primary goal of Baltra is to provide a Mac OS X compatible AFP file sharing service with Samba 3.0 compatibility. We are hoping to have an AFP file sharing daemon which can run in parallel with Samba 3.0 to provide seemless file sharing amoungst SMB-based clients (Windows and MacOS-X) as well as

Hello Kevin, Mac OS by default looks for TimeMachine volumes over AFP not CIFS-SMB… Like you, I experimented with Samba a couple of years ago to try to get it to work anyway. With a few modifications on the client’s part and some configuration on the Samba server I got it to work… but recovery only worked for clients that I had configured in advance… Recovery with the Mac OS tools (Migration

Hello Rsync Community, I have been using rsync for several years to backup servers across an array of different areas. I have run into a new problem that I cannot find an answer for. We just recently purchased a Lacie 5Big Network RAID: http://www.cdw.com/shop/products/default.aspx?EDC=1596257 for one organization. We set up a test server to start backing up to this RAID via AFP. The

TL;DR: Time Machine cannot create a *new* backup on my shared drive, but can add to an *existing* backup. I'm running macOS Catalina and my Time Machine backs up to a Debian 10 server with NetAtalk and Avahi. Since Mavericks macOS has preferred SMB, and given SMB is marginally faster I decided to switch to using SMB for the Time Machine shares. On a fresh AFP share I can start a new Time

since "ea = samba" was only added to very recent netatalk versions and so don't apply to files with a history of many years what is the way to go get rid of netatalk these days? is there still no tool to read/write the existing netatalk appladouble extended attributes which are *not* compatible with samba and write them back in the new format? afp.conf: appledouble = ea ea = samba

In case of FreeBSD, the name of the extended attribute is wrong. % lsextattr user ICONandEA.txt ICONandEA.txt netatalk.Metadata com.apple.TextEncoding com.apple.metadata:kMDItemFinderComment "netatalk.Metadata" is incompatible to Netatalk. The first atom "org." is removed. source3/include/smb.h: /* Prefix for DosStreams in the vfs_streams_xattr module */ #define

Am 13.05.2018 um 12:11 schrieb Reindl Harald via samba: > since "ea = samba" was only added to very recent netatalk versions and > so don't apply to files with a history of many years what is the way to > go get rid of netatalk these days? > > is there still no tool to read/write the existing netatalk appladouble > extended attributes which are *not* compatible

Hello all, I’m trying to use samba 4.5.8 as a file server for my Macs (all 10.12.4 now), as a replacement for netatalk. I did setup smb.conf as suggested # # Options for macOS # http://netatalk.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/Netatalk_3.1.11_SRPM_for_Fedora_and_CentOS <http://netatalk.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/Netatalk_3.1.11_SRPM_for_Fedora_and_CentOS> # ea support = yes vfs

Hi all, Looking for a "best practices" way to share out to both Mac and PC easily. I know Windoze enables the same sharepoint for both the mac and pc shares and there don't seem to be any real "problems" by doing that. However I work in an environment which forces us to utilize Win9x through XP as well as OS 9 through 10.x on the mac side. I need a user friendly way to

On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 03:46:49PM +0200, Frank Heldt via samba wrote: > Hello all, > > I’m trying to use samba 4.5.8 as a file server for my Macs (all 10.12.4 now), as a replacement for netatalk. > > I did setup smb.conf as suggested > > # > # Options for macOS > # http://netatalk.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/Netatalk_3.1.11_SRPM_for_Fedora_and_CentOS

Hey! I have been given the task to mirror our fileserver's filesystem onto a secondary machine for redundancy. The first thing that came to mind was rsync, but now I have few questions as I am far from an expert on this matter. Our file server is running Debian Stable. We use Samba for our Windows users and Netatalk (AFP) for our OS X clients. The filesystem used on the server is

Hello, thanks in advance for the support! My samba server is samba-3.6.23-45.el6_9.x86_64, on Scientific Linux 6. Using a Mac it is possible to associate a color label to a file (suppose a word document). This can be done on the samba share too, but if I edit the file and save the changes the color label is lost (like if it is reset to empty). When the file is local or it is in shared volume

Thank you. I will try your suggestions. First I will connect the NAS directly to the computer (Do you recommend USB2 or 1 Gb Ethernet? Or should I daisy chain external HD and NAS? Then it would look like this: Computer <--FW800--> HD <--USB2--> NAS The other option is HD <--FW800--> Computer <--USB2 or Ethernet 1000Mbit --> NAS But I still must say it is weird that

Hi There, I've just upgraded to 2 new 2008 R2 domain controllers, and had been using 2003 integration with samba successfully. After hitting this issue https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6700 I upgraded my samba to 3.4.8, which seems to be working OK for pc hosts. However, I used to also log in some OSX 10.5 clients in using smb, and now these clients are getting "password

Hello Jeremy, Could you send me some references to the ‘cross-protocol issue’ (Bugzilla, documentation, etc)? I’ll disable the ‘kernel oplocks’ and see what happens. We’re getting all sorts of weirdness from our Mac SMB clients since we upgraded to Samba v4.4.3. In particular, when we open a session with an OSX (Yosemite) client with SMB autommount directories, we see multiple SMBD processes

Hi Ram, In OS X, some font types (not all) put the font payload in the resource fork. Netatalk provides AFP filesharing, imitating the resource forks by creating secondary files in ?.Appledouble? folders within each folder. Netatalk tracks the resource forks, and other metadata, by keeping a ?Desktop database? at the root of the shared volume ? look for .AppleDesktop, and .AppleDB. You can

Hi. I configured a simple samba server. As I need this server to be available in macOS ?Network? list, I configured avahi. When I start smb.service and avahi-daemon.service I get two results in the ?Network? section. When I don?t use avahi I get no entry. Why are there two entries and which best practice can I use to have only one entry? Thanks! Steven ##################################### cat