similar to: OT: Large corporate email systems - Exchange vs open source *nix based

i was wondering how a blog db has grown by about 15 mb in a week or two. it turns out its the sessions table.. so ive tried this: class ApplicationController.. session :off end class AccountController session :only, :login end and now, its impossible to login, and nothing ever appears in the session table. is this the right approach? i dont want to weed out the sessions with cron, i just

I have a controller method called update_all that grabs parameters for about 30 form fields and saves them to the database. My current code looks to see if there is a string in params[] for each form field (two fields for each SelfEvaluationItem) and saves the updated self_evaluation_answer if a string is available. Since this is iterated code, I am almost certain that this generates 30 or so

This sounds more like an Windows problem, but it is an interaction with Samba and I'm hoping someone has an idea of where to start looking. 3 times in the past week I've had a user (different user each time) come to me saying their P: drive is inaccessible, access denied. The P: drive is set in the user's Active Directory Profile as their home directory \\sambaserver\home$\%username%

On 5/12/20 8:45 AM, Michael Hirmke wrote: > Hi Robert, > >> Hi, sorry for top post >> but short answer is ,there is no exchange without outlook, that is what >> makes exchange a good "groupware solution", on windows only. >> So compare it to dovecot makes only small sense..... Have you looked at SOGo for a groupware option? https://sogo.nu/ -- Bob

On 12-05-2020 15:45, Michael Hirmke wrote: > Hi Robert, > >> Hi, sorry for top post >> but short answer is ,there is no exchange without outlook, that is what >> makes exchange a good "groupware solution", on windows only. >> So compare it to dovecot makes only small sense..... > > you can use Exchange with pure IMAP clients, too, but then you lose

Hi, sorry for top post but short answer is ,there is no exchange without outlook, that is what makes exchange a good "groupware solution", on windows only. So compare it to dovecot makes only small sense..... Am 12.05.20 um 13:24 schrieb Michael Hirmke: > Hi Marc, > > >> How did you decide for the Baikal? I have been testing a long time ago > > it was easy to

I notice that there's a lot of code in LLVM core libraries that is wildly inconsistent in formatting. Two particular things come to mind: -- Capitalization of method names. The LLVM guidelines say one thing, but a lot of recent code (such as IRBuilder) consistently does the opposite of what the guidelines say. One has to wonder which source of truth is more authoritative - after all, the docs

Good evening from Singapore, Is there any way I can deploy cPanel web hosting control panel with Microsoft Exchange 2016 groupware behind one static public IP? Or do I need 2 static public IP addresses at the minimum? With Exchange 2016 groupware taking up HTTP, HTTPS, IMAP, IMAPS, POP3, POP3S, SMTP, and SMTP/S ports, I personally don't think I can deploy cPanel behind the same public IP as

Dear Richard Grainger, I am grateful for your reply and guidance. After reading the following article at nginx.com, I realize that I should use a reverse proxy instead of a load balancer. Article: WHAT IS A REVERSE PROXY VS. LOAD BALANCER? Link: https://www.nginx.com/resources/glossary/reverse-proxy-vs-load-balancer/ Presently, I am using pfSense community edition firewall. Can I install

Hi, I recently migrated from an NT4 Domain to a Samba domain with LDAP backend. We use Exchange 5.5 on NT4 as our mail/groupware. All existing users on the domain appear to be using the Exchange Server without any problems. However, when i create new users they cannot access their mail box'es from Outlook. The Event log on the Exchange Server reports the following error : > A logon

On 19/07/2018 15:57, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > <rant> > As far as google anything goes, not everybody volunteers one's > information into paws of google (and quite likely one or more of 3 > letter agencies collecting information that way). I know (call it > educated guess) that about 70% of messages I send are ending up in > google databases whether I want it or not.

Hi, This might be a stupid question, since my knowledge about Exchange is really poor... Since I've got iPhone, I have noticed that IMAP mailbox support is quite crippled in this device - in comparison to Exchange mailboxes... As I assume that it would be easier to convince Bill Gates to install linux than to convince Steve Jobs to change anything in his "perfect phone", I

Dear Promise Kumalo, Thank you for the recommendations. So for Exchange equivalents in the Linux world, it is Zimbra and Kolab. ________________________________ From: CentOS <centos-bounces at centos.org> on behalf of Promise Kumalo <promise.kumalo at outlook.com> Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2018 11:38 PM To: centos at centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS] Which is better? Microsoft

> -----Original Message----- > From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users- > bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of J. Oquendo > Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 6:47 AM > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > Subject: [asterisk-users] Asterisk brute force watcher (was FYI) > > Steve Totaro wrote: > > I suspect that

How did you decide for the Baikal? I have been testing a long time ago with this apple ccs calendarserver, but it did/does not feel right. I think there were tasks also in this one, but I am not sure anymore. I had argument with the developers that they should not enforce openssl building, they did not get that they are developers and not sysadmins and should just do development. Their

I have recently been working/testing with exchange 2016 and started thinking if I should even migrate to this platform. I assume more people here have experience with exchange and this idea. I was wondering if this is possible with a dovecot setup 1. public folder can be implemented with a public mailbox? 2. authorize users via groups access to mailboxes/folders of the public

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Keith Keller" <kkeller at wombat.san-francisco.ca.us> > To: centos at centos.org > Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2018 11:33:17 AM > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Which is better? Microsoft Exchange 2016 or Linux-based SMTP Servers? > On 2018-07-19, Mark Rousell <mark.rousell at signal100.com> wrote: >> >> Well said. I feel

Dear friends, I have the following dataframe: YEAR <- c(1996 , 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004 ) T_MAR <- c(2.8, 6.5, 5.4,2.4, 4, 4.1, 3, 4.4, 4.5) T_APR <- c(5.7, 7.8, 7.7, 4.6, 4.7, 6.2,5.7, 5.9, 7) T_MAY <- c(7, 8.8, 10, 6, 5.5, 7.6, 8.5, 7.3, 10.2) BUD <- c(87, 98, 93, 85, 89, 91, 87, 92, 92) BUD_SE <- c(3.6, 2, 2.4, 4, 2.4, 2.4, 4, 2.4, 3) g1 <-

Hi, Bert: Yes, I studied the functions you suggested, but I didn't get to adapt it to my example whose reproducible code I sent in my first email. Here it is the code of the functions I studies: ## par par(mfrow = c(2, 3)) par(cex = 0.6) par(mar = c(3, 3, 0, 0), oma = c(1, 1, 1, 1)) for (i in 1:6) { plot(1, 1, type = "n") mtext(letters[i], side = 3, line = -1, adj = 0.1, cex =

Consider this script (with h5 installed): $ cat test.R library(h5) name <- tempfile() f <- h5file(name) file.remove(name) $ Rscript test.R Error in initialize(value, ...) : cannot use object of class "character" in new(): class "H5File" does not extend that class Calls: h5file -> new -> initialize -> initialize Execution halted $ /usr/lib64/R/bin/R --slave