Displaying 20 results from an estimated 100 matches similar to: "[PATCH] arm: xen: foreign mapping PTEs are special."
2011 Jul 21
51
Linux Stubdom Problem
2011/7/19 Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>:
> CC''ing Tim and xen-devel
>
> On Mon, 18 Jul 2011, Jiageng Yu wrote:
>> 2011/7/16 Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>:
>> > On Fri, 15 Jul 2011, Jiageng Yu wrote:
>> >> 2011/7/15 Jiageng Yu <yujiageng734@gmail.com>:
>> >> > 2011/7/15
2006 Apr 28
3
[PATCH 1/2] balloon driver: relax BUG_ON() in increasee_reservation()
1 / 2
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
2020 Jul 06
0
[PATCH 1/5] nouveau: fix storing invalid ptes
When migrating a range of system memory to device private memory, some
of the pages in the address range may not be migrating. In this case,
the non migrating pages won't have a new GPU MMU entry to store but
the nvif_object_ioctl() NVIF_VMM_V0_PFNMAP method doesn't check the input
and stores a bad valid GPU page table entry.
Fix this by skipping the invalid input PTEs when updating the
2020 Jul 13
0
[PATCH v2 1/5] nouveau: fix storing invalid ptes
When migrating a range of system memory to device private memory, some
of the pages in the address range may not be migrating. In this case,
the non migrating pages won't have a new GPU MMU entry to store but
the nvif_object_ioctl() NVIF_VMM_V0_PFNMAP method doesn't check the input
and stores a bad valid GPU page table entry.
Fix this by skipping the invalid input PTEs when updating the
2020 Jul 23
0
[PATCH v4 1/6] nouveau: fix storing invalid ptes
When migrating a range of system memory to device private memory, some
of the pages in the address range may not be migrating. In this case,
the non migrating pages won't have a new GPU MMU entry to store but
the nvif_object_ioctl() NVIF_VMM_V0_PFNMAP method doesn't check the input
and stores a bad valid GPU page table entry.
Fix this by skipping the invalid input PTEs when updating the
2016 Jun 16
2
[PATCH v7 00/12] Support non-lru page migration
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 01:23:43PM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (06/16/16 11:58), Minchan Kim wrote:
> [..]
> > RAX: 2065676162726166 so rax is totally garbage, I think.
> > It means obj_to_head returns garbage because get_first_obj_offset is
> > utter crab because (page_idx / class->pages_per_zspage) was totally
> > wrong.
> >
> > >
2016 Jun 16
2
[PATCH v7 00/12] Support non-lru page migration
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 01:23:43PM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (06/16/16 11:58), Minchan Kim wrote:
> [..]
> > RAX: 2065676162726166 so rax is totally garbage, I think.
> > It means obj_to_head returns garbage because get_first_obj_offset is
> > utter crab because (page_idx / class->pages_per_zspage) was totally
> > wrong.
> >
> > >
2016 Jun 16
2
[PATCH v7 00/12] Support non-lru page migration
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 11:48:27AM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On (06/16/16 08:12), Minchan Kim wrote:
> > > [ 315.146533] kasan: CONFIG_KASAN_INLINE enabled
> > > [ 315.146538] kasan: GPF could be caused by NULL-ptr deref or user memory access
> > > [ 315.146546] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN
> > > [
2016 Jun 16
2
[PATCH v7 00/12] Support non-lru page migration
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 11:48:27AM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On (06/16/16 08:12), Minchan Kim wrote:
> > > [ 315.146533] kasan: CONFIG_KASAN_INLINE enabled
> > > [ 315.146538] kasan: GPF could be caused by NULL-ptr deref or user memory access
> > > [ 315.146546] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN
> > > [
2016 Jun 16
2
[PATCH v7 00/12] Support non-lru page migration
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 02:22:09PM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (06/16/16 13:47), Minchan Kim wrote:
> [..]
> > > this is what I'm getting with the [zsmalloc: keep first object offset in struct page]
> > > applied: "count:0 mapcount:-127". which may be not related to zsmalloc at this point.
> > >
> > > kernel: BUG: Bad page state
2016 Jun 16
2
[PATCH v7 00/12] Support non-lru page migration
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 02:22:09PM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (06/16/16 13:47), Minchan Kim wrote:
> [..]
> > > this is what I'm getting with the [zsmalloc: keep first object offset in struct page]
> > > applied: "count:0 mapcount:-127". which may be not related to zsmalloc at this point.
> > >
> > > kernel: BUG: Bad page state
2020 Apr 13
2
Build regressions/improvements in v5.7-rc1
On Mon, 13 Apr 2020, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Below is the list of build error/warning regressions/improvements in
> v5.7-rc1[1] compared to v5.6[2].
>
> Summarized:
> - build errors: +132/-3
> - build warnings: +257/-79
>
> Happy fixing! ;-)
>
> Thanks to the linux-next team for providing the build service.
>
> [1]
2020 Apr 13
2
Build regressions/improvements in v5.7-rc1
On Mon, 13 Apr 2020, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Below is the list of build error/warning regressions/improvements in
> v5.7-rc1[1] compared to v5.6[2].
>
> Summarized:
> - build errors: +132/-3
> - build warnings: +257/-79
>
> Happy fixing! ;-)
>
> Thanks to the linux-next team for providing the build service.
>
> [1]
2009 Mar 23
1
SATA tape drive on 4.7
I have gotten a hard system lockup several times using star on my system
with a Quantum DLT-V4 SATA tape drive. I am including what got recorded
in /var/log/messages from the most recent event showing stack trace.
Output from uname -a:
Linux lh10 2.6.9-78.0.13.ELsmp #1 SMP Wed Jan 14 15:55:36 EST 2009
x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Mar 22 22:02:59 lh10 kernel: Bad page state at
2019 Nov 08
15
[PATCH 00/13] Finish off [smp_]read_barrier_depends()
Hi all,
Although [smp_]read_barrier_depends() became part of READ_ONCE() in
commit 76ebbe78f739 ("locking/barriers: Add implicit
smp_read_barrier_depends() to READ_ONCE()"), it still limps on in the
Linux memory model with the sinister hope of attracting innocent new
users so that it becomes impossible to remove altogether.
Let's strike before it's too late: there's only
2013 Oct 17
42
[PATCH v8 0/19] enable swiotlb-xen on arm and arm64
Hi all,
this patch series enables xen-swiotlb on arm and arm64.
It has been heavily reworked compared to the previous versions in order
to achieve better performances and to address review comments.
We are not using dma_mark_clean to ensure coherency anymore. We call the
platform implementation of map_page and unmap_page.
We assume that dom0 has been mapped 1:1 (physical address ==
machine
2016 Jun 16
1
[PATCH v7 00/12] Support non-lru page migration
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 05:42:11PM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (06/16/16 15:47), Minchan Kim wrote:
> > > [..]
> > > > > this is what I'm getting with the [zsmalloc: keep first object offset in struct page]
> > > > > applied: "count:0 mapcount:-127". which may be not related to zsmalloc at this point.
> > > > >
>
2016 Jun 16
1
[PATCH v7 00/12] Support non-lru page migration
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 05:42:11PM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (06/16/16 15:47), Minchan Kim wrote:
> > > [..]
> > > > > this is what I'm getting with the [zsmalloc: keep first object offset in struct page]
> > > > > applied: "count:0 mapcount:-127". which may be not related to zsmalloc at this point.
> > > > >
>
2024 Nov 13
2
[RFC PATCH v1 00/10] mm: Introduce and use folio_owner_ops
On Tue, Nov 12, 2024 at 03:22:46PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 12.11.24 14:53, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 12, 2024 at 10:10:06AM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> > > On 12.11.24 06:26, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > > I don't want you to respin. I think this is a bad idea.
> > >
> > > I'm hoping you'll find some more
2006 May 06
3
Kernel 2.6.15 + Google Earth
I recently upgraded wine from 0.9.7 to 0.9.12 and while checking out that things
were working I started up Google Earth but had the following error in terminal:
Message from syslogd@TheVoid at Sun May 7 02:40:26 2006 ...
TheVoid kernel: Bad page state at free_hot_cold_page (in process
'GoogleEarth.exe', page c125be60)
Message from syslogd@TheVoid at Sun May 7 02:40:26 2006 ...
TheVoid