similar to: Possible to use Tinc with embedded SSL implementations like PolarSSL, YaSSL?

Hey Timo, Just curious if you ever thought about supporting other than just OpenSSL? PolarSSL looks really interesting, has no major dependencies and is very lightweight compared to OpenSSL, GNUTLS or others... https://polarssl.org/ I guess it could be a lot of work, or not, anyway, I'm just curious... -- Best regards, */Charles/*

Hi, Is it possible to compile tinc against polarssl ? Perry

I'm trying to build the MySQL components in asterisk-addons but no luck so far. I hope that you can help. I have MySQL installed. rpm -qa indicates: MySQL-server-5.0.22-0 MySQL-devel-5.0.22-0 MySQL-client-5.0.22-0 rpm -ql MySQL-devel | grep client indicates: /usr/lib/mysql/libmysqlclient.a /usr/lib/mysql/libmysqlclient.la /usr/lib/mysql/libmysqlclient_r.a /usr/lib/mysql/libmysqlclient_r.la

I'm currently running a pre 1.0 version of dovecot. Months back I tried to compile beta6, couldn't due to some mysql client libraries issues, and gave up. I'm now trying again with rc6. This is on a fedora core2 box, with postfix 2.3 and mysql 5.0. The error I'm getting when I run make is below. Any help would be greatly appreciated, thanks! I'd really like to get up to

I've got a first cut of the rebase here: git://github.com/gwd/sig-virt-xen out/update-4.4.1-rc1-ee81dda-RFC To build it, you'll need to download the polarssl tarball: http://xenbits.xen.org/xen-extfiles/polarssl-1.1.4-gpl.tgz And you'll need a tarball based on (unfortunately) a private tree, which you can find here: git://github.com/gwd/xen base/update-4.4.1-rc1-ee81dda-RFC This

This patch ports 5 new applications to the stubdom makefile structure for inclusion into stubdom domains. While these are required for vtpm-stubdom and vtpmmgrdom they could be used with other stubdom applications. -libgmp 4.3.2 -openssl 1.0.0a -polarssl 0.12.1 -berlios tpm_emulator 0.6.1 -vtpm_manager (from the tools directory) Signed off by: Matthew Fioravante

On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 9:30 PM, Guus Sliepen <guus at tinc-vpn.org> wrote: > Although the cryptography is now separated from the rest of the logic in > tinc, it is not really replaceable, since only OpenSSL is supported. > However, there is also a new protocol in tinc 1.1, which uses Ed25519 > and ChaCha-Poly1305. The code for those algorithms is included in tinc, > so the

Hi all, I'm wondering if the GPL-2.0 licensed mbedTLS (that's the version in OpenWrt) is 'compatible' with NUT binaries (not including the Python or Perl binaries which aren't used in OpenWrt) which is GPL 2.1+ AIUI. Because mbedTLS is the default library for OpenWrt and NSS is not yet in OpenWrt, and because OpenSSL is considered incompatible (I seem to recall reading that

The default make targets in the top level makefile set DESTDIR which gets applied when the stubdom makefile tries to do a make install within gmp to install libgmp.a to the cross root. Ian, do you want to apply this to your tree and commit the whole thing or would you prefer I roll out a fresh new patch set with all updates applied? Signed-off-by: Matthew Fioravante

Hello OpenSSH Developers and Community, wolfSSL (formerly known as CyaSSL) is a dual licensed SSL/TLS implementation specializing in the embedded space. As we have grown we are being used in larger systems due to our reduced resource consumption on a per-session basis. Many have found that their servers are able to service more connections by replacing OpenSSL with wolfSSL. Our engineers have

Or polarssl ? www.polarssl.org Static link? On 12/28/2014 11:00 AM, Pedro C?rte-Real wrote: > On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 9:30 PM, Guus Sliepen <guus at tinc-vpn.org> wrote: >> Although the cryptography is now separated from the rest of the logic in >> tinc, it is not really replaceable, since only OpenSSL is supported. >> However, there is also a new protocol in tinc

The following are a set of patches to run the berlios tpm emulator 0.6.1 in a mini-os domain, called vtpm-stubdom. Documentation on how to use this domain is located at stubdom/vtpm/README. The following are a series of patches that enable this domain and also add significant stability improvements to the entire vTPM subsystem, including the original method of using vtpmd as a process.

Since the vTPM implementations are being incorproated into Xen and possibly upstream Linux, I would like to see if this protocol change could be added before we have significant legacy implementations. If not, I still think it would be useful as either a v2 or negotiated protocol change. The current vTPM protocol is a copy of the network protocol. This was likely done for ease of implementation,

Hello everyone, I was wondering how i should do destination routing. I now do # ip rule add to x.x.x.x table some_table for each address i need. I was thinking about fwmark option. The problem is that routing decision is made after PREROUTING and not POSTROUTING (name obviously sais that :)) and i need to use -o. In OUTPUT this marking can''t be done. I made this conclusion by studying

Hello. I'm looking for a fast way to group by similarity many (5-10k) long (2-10k points) time series. Using PAM on distance matrix obtained via as.dist(1-abs(cor(data))) produces usable results but it's rather slow and doesn't catch slightly shifted time series. DTW implementation from package 'dtw' is orders of magnitude slower even with global window constraints which

I've done a little digging, but I haven't been able to find an MPI or snow (or any other distributed processing) implementation of fanny (from cluster) or cmeans. Is anyone aware of some implementations or addons which I've missed? [I know of doi://10.1007/978-3-540-71351-7; but that's not for R] Don Armstrong [Currently not subscribed; M-F-T: set accordingly.] -- Certainly

I am wondering if there are any such network devices as: - a CUPS print server which basically gives the CUPS web interface and then allows you to upload the windows drivers? - A standalone floppy and/or CD drive that is network attachable. I know both of these can be easily created using s simple SAMBA install - just wondering if anyone has taken it one step further and made a little network

On Oct 31, 2008, at 10:13 AM, Daniel M Gessel wrote: > Are there existing "generic" implementations for these functions under > the same license as LLVM? By generic I mean C or IR that doesn't use > any particular HW intrinsics. Hi Daniel, We're working on a complete ground-up implementation of the API vended by libgcc, including these routines, under the LLVM

Hello Everyone > bindings. There is http://llvm.org/ProjectsWithLLVM/ but that seems to > be more about self-contained applications of LLVM. I think it would be > useful to add a page (or section to an existing page) if you all > agree. My binding is https://github.com/keithshep/llvm-fs and I know > that there are many others. +1. Keith, if you'll create such page including

OK I'll do that. I might not get to it until the weekend depending on how much free time I have. Thanks, Keith On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 3:46 AM, Anton Korobeynikov <anton at korobeynikov.info> wrote: > Hello Everyone > >> bindings. There is http://llvm.org/ProjectsWithLLVM/ but that seems to >> be more about self-contained applications of LLVM. I think it would be