similar to: Tab browser

Hello and happy new year :) I have to set up a samba server as a PDC with a openldap backend. My openldap server is fully functionnal and it is not secured yet (so no problems with tls). I must use debian etch or lenny. My server's IP is 192.168.9.10/24. I have set up a dns server (bind9) for my domain named "mik". It's a local domain for testing only. There is a piece of

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 I am not sure if this is a bug or my syntax is wrong but when specifying an external control for the inplace editor, this works fine in IE but not in firefox or netscape. The error that returns in the javascript console on mozilla based browsers is edit_50 is not defined. <script language="JavaScript"> new

I am running Ubuntu 8.04 through Wubi on a HP Pavilion dv4000 (my home computer) and I recently installed R 2.7.1. I attempted to install the randomForest package from within the R environment and from the Linux terminal. Both attempts failed. I've tried several mirrors but with no luck. Below is an example of the series of error messages I got when R told me that the installation

Hi, I have written a 'smallish' patch to implement the --inplace option as discussed on this mailing list at various points in the past. It makes a small modification to the sender algorithm so that it won't ask the receiver to relocate blocks from earlier in the file when running with the --inplace option. I would appreciate any testing and feedback people can provide! I

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Anyone have any ideas on this one, it appears that that $() is not working to get object by id in Mozilla based browsers. Does anyone know how to fix this? I am a n00b to javascript. Is this a bug or am I doing something wrong? Can someone please confirm this. - -----Original Message----- From: Stephen Major [mailto:smajor@gmail.com] Sent:

From: Kim Mik <kimmik999999 at yahoo.co.uk> To: For discussion of Syslinux and tftp-hpa <syslinux at zytor.com> Sent: Tuesday, 29 September, 2009 22:21:39 Subject: Re: [syslinux] Chainc.32 missing some \n one error messages > From: Kim Mik <kimmik999999 at yahoo.co.uk> > To: syslinux at zytor.com > Sent: Monday, 17 August, 2009 1:30:04 > Subject: [syslinux] Chainc.32

Wayne, I noticed that rsync will let me apply a non-inplace batch file in inplace mode. This corrupts the destination file if the batch file copies any data forward (from earlier offsets to later ones). Of course, the post-transfer checksum detects the corruption and gives the "ERROR: <file> failed verification" message, but rsync doesn't give the user a clue why the

Hi! As I commonly spell --inplace as --in-place, I'd like to suggest this simple patch: commit 5689f99b702788044a45e13582559832cf986328 Author: Jan-Benedict Glaw <jbglaw at lug-owl.de> Date: Wed Jun 26 22:49:31 2019 +0200 Allow "--in-place" as an alternative option name for "--inplace". diff --git a/options.c b/options.c index e5b0cb68..7ff0c51d 100644 ---

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5201 Summary: Rsync lets user corrupt dest by applying non-inplace batch in inplace mode Product: rsync Version: 3.0.0 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo:

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4834 Summary: --inplace with --backup --backup-dir does not work Product: rsync Version: 2.6.9 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy: joost@seat-ibiza.nl

I worked this out over the weekend. I appreciate that using temporary variables would be simpler but I think this makes for quite readable code: # in RProfile.site inplace <- function (f, arg=1) eval.parent(call("<-",substitute(f)[[arg+1]], f),2) # examples in code inplace(foo[bar,baz] *2) # or inplace(paste(foo[bar,baz], 1:10)) # or inplace(sub("blah",

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 - --inplace and --append-verify are essentially irrelevant when - --link-dest is in play. With --link-dest in play the target system must write an entirely new file even for a change in permissions or timestamps so any potential benefit by these options are out the window from the start. The only thing they can do is add the possibility of

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11651 Bug ID: 11651 Summary: Can we allow --inplace and --sparse to coexist when --whole-file is in play? Product: rsync Version: 3.1.2 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: core

Hi, I followed the tutorial about installing RoR on a Pair Networks'' Host. Everything seem to work but the application lives few seconds (checked in browser, it works ) and then the process is killed. Another thing, every time I connect to the host through SSH I have to type setenv GEM_PATH ~/lib/ruby/gems/1.8 (freeBSD) Otherwise it doesn''t find Ruby, is there a way to avoid

Hello,Thank you to both of you for your answers.I just use imap.I'm going to look at your examples and 15-lda.confHave a nice week Le Dimanche 9 avril 2017 17h44, chaouche yacine <yacinechaouche at yahoo.com> a ?crit : On Saturday, April 8, 2017 9:47 AM, Mik J <mikydevel at yahoo.fr> wrote: > Then commented out in 90-quota.conf > >quota_rule = *:storage=1G >

hi, i observe some weirdness in rsync file transfer i cannot explain. i'm transferring data from 2 freenas storages to a linux vm with zfsonlinux. "fnask" is older freenas with rsync 3.1.1 running in daemon mode, freenas-bnkw is more recent with rsync 3.1.2, also daemon-mode. on the linux vm where the data is being pulled from the 2 freenas boxes, i look onto io bandwidth being

Hi all, >From the manpage of rsync, I can see the following descriptions: --inplace The option implies --partial (since an interrupted transfer does not delete the file) So I do the following testings on the `--inplace' and `--partial' for resuming a file with the following steps: 1- rsync ftp.cn.debian.org::debian/dists/wheezy/main/binary-amd64/

Is there any way I can render or send_file in a new browser tab or browser window? - Vicky -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7823 Summary: Documentation enhancement for --inplace option Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: erik at logtenberg.eu

Hi, I recently came across a situation where "rsync --inplace" performs very poorly. If both the source and destination files contain long sequences of identical blocks, but not necessarily in the same location, the sender can spend an inordinate amount of CPU time finding matching blocks. In my case, I came across this problem while backing up multi-hundred-gigabyte MySQL database