similar to: validates :boolean_field, presence: true misconceptions

There''s a small inconsistency in ActiveRecord''s callback syntax that has tripped me up before. It wouldn''t be a big deal, but it can lead to a silent failure. I''d like to suggest that it either be made consistent or be made to fail loudly. The issue is that to do something before validating, but only when creating, you use `before_validation on: :create`,

Just putting this out there before I make a pull request. Is there any interest in an asset_url method as a view helper? It would work by using the config.action_controller.asset_host if it exists and prepending this to the results of asset_path. I have found this necessary when writing html emails and needing a full url path for assets. Since my CDN in the asset_host mirrors my assets in my

I suggest that if you don''t pass any args to ActiveRecord#pluck, it would use the select values. This follows along well with the way other AR::Calculations work. As an extra benefit we would be able to pluck virtual columns. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To view this discussion on the web visit

(I posted this as a bug in GitHub (https://github.com/rails/rails/issues/7018), but then someone there told me I should post it here, so here it is.) If you set attr_accessible on some properties in an ActiveRecord-descended class, and then attr_protected on others - the class becomes ''default-open'' - if any properties are missed or added later, they will be accessible by

This is a delivery failure notification message indicating that an email you sent could not be delivered. The problem appears to be : -- Recipient email server rejected the message This condition occurred after 1 attempt(s) to deliver over a period of 0 hour(s). If you sent the email to multiple recipients, you will receive one of these messages for each one which failed delivery, otherwise

Just that: class Date > def remaining_to(date) > if date.acts_like? :date > date - self > end > end > alias :days_to end and then be able to do this: Date.today.remaining_to(Date.parse ''2014-04-02'').days.seconds -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To

Hey everyone, first of all, thank you for the tremendous work and effort on making Rails more awesome every day. I''ve brought up this "issue" on Github last Friday. [1] Steve Klabnik told me to bring the discussion here, as it''s more appropriate. The thing is, there is some amount of logic scattered around Rails (and its tests) that depends upon error/exception

Hello! Are the plans of splitting ActionPack for several gems (AbstractController, ActionView, etc)? Like https://github.com/rails/rails/pull/7356 ... I.e. I know gems that are needed AbstractController only... And they are forced to require the whole ActionPack... Thanx. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To

I would like to validate a number within a certain range. To first test that a entry is a valid number i use validates_numericality_of :my_number, :message =>''sorry, not a number'' to test if the number is within a certain range i use validates_inclusion of :my_number, :in => min..max, message => ''outside range!'' If the numericality test fails, I

Hi everyone, I''m having trouble validating a model. The corresponding table has some boolean columns: create_table :permissions do |t| t.column :project_id, :integer, :null => false t.column :group_id, :integer, :null => false t.column :read, :boolean, :null => false, :default => false t.column :write, :boolean, :null => false, :default =>

hi guys, It''s my first time here and in a mailing lists, I only participated in forums before. Please, If I make a mistake you should advise me. Let''s go! I was reading "xencommons not start" in a Remus Forum in order to install Remus. Well… I followed the tutorial < http://remusha.wikidot.com/configuring-and-installing-remus>, I reboot in xen_unstable and I had

hi guys, It''s my first time here and in a mailing lists, I only participated in forums before. Please, If I make a mistake you should advise me. Let''s go! I was reading "xencommons not start" in a Remus Forum in order to install Remus. Well… I followed the tutorial < http://remusha.wikidot.com/configuring-and-installing-remus>, I reboot in xen_unstable and I had

Hi, I''m doing my master research and I need to adapt remus code. Now... I wanna get the checkpoint size (memory + disk) on each period. Does someone know what function does this? I think some *fd *object''s function in remus code could just get the memory size. Does someone help me? Thanks _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list

I''m probably going to help backport some code from master onto 3.2, and the suggested process in the Contributing guide doesn''t actually look like the best approach to me. Wouldn''t it make more sense to just check out the branch you want to patch, cherry-pick the change(s) from master, make any additional commits necessary to get it working? Not only is that simpler

Hi everyone, I am happy to announce that Rails 4.0.4.rc1 has been released. This is a bug fix release and includes more than 290 commits. If no regressions are found we will release 4.0.4 final this Friday, on March 14, 2014. If you find one, please open an Issue on GitHub and mention me (@rafaelfranca) on it, so that we can fix it before the final release. ## CHANGES since 4.0.3 To view the

After stumbling merrily into the ''node inheritance variable override'' problem last night (see ''RFC: Changing variable override'' thread for more info), it occurred to me that it would be useful to have a page in the Wiki to describe common misconceptions of the way that the puppet language and system works. Are folk happy for this to be a separate page, or

Hi everyone, I am happy to announce that Rails 4.0.1.rc1 has been released. This is a bug fix release and includes more than 450 commits. This release comes up with an important change on how Active Record handles subsequent `order` calls. In Rails 4.0.0 when you do something like this: ```ruby User.order("name asc").order("created_at desc") ``` The later called `order`

Hey there, I came across this thread: http://www.ruby-forum.com/topic/78148#126235 where sorting in reverse by a boolean field wasn''t working properly. I''m having the same issue now, but there''s not a reply in that thread. I was wondering if anyone has figured this out yet? Bascially, I want all the records with a "1" (true) to float to the top of the

We found two regressions. One on Active Record and one on Action Pack. Took some time to fix those issues so the release was delayed until today. Here are the changes from 4.0.1.rc3 to 4.0.1.rc4: https://github.com/rails/rails/compare/v4.0.1.rc3...v4.0.1.rc4 And the changes from 4.0.0 to 4.0.1: https://github.com/rails/rails/compare/v4.0.0...v4.0.1.rc4 If we don''t hit any more

Dear r helpers, I'm trying to run the models of the BIOMOD package and got this message: * Error in nnet.default (x, y, w,...): **initial value in 'vmmin' is not finite* What does this mean? and how can I correct it? Thank you *Andreia* [[alternative HTML version deleted]]