similar to: Can't install R 2.15 and r-recommended on Ubuntu

Dear Mr. Beginning to work on Linux. I am trying to install R into Ubuntu Gustsy. I installed version 2.5.1 and worked fine. But then I tried to upgrade by adding these lines to sources.list: deb http://cran.fiocruz.br/bin/linux/debian etch-cran/ deb http://cran.fiocruz.br/bin/linux/ubuntu gutsy/ I introduced the authorization keys (as recommended) and the files were downloaded. But then I

Today, a package that has an HTML vignette (but no PDF vignette) failed R CMD check --as-cran on a system without qpdf. I think the warning originates here [1], due to a premature check for the existence of qpdf [2]. Setting R_QPDF=true (as in /bin/true) helped, but perhaps it's possible to check qpdf existence only when it matters. I have attached a patch (untested) that could serve as a

Running a current, standard debian stable, I added deb http://cran.R-project.org/bin/linux/debian stable/ to /apt/sources.list to get the current backport stable distro. When I installed r-base, apt-get wanted to remove all my previous r-cran-* packages and I let it, but encountered conflicts with things in r-recommended that I've been unable to resolve. It first showed up as (complete

Dear all, I run R CMD build --compact-vignettes="both" gRbase and/or R CMD build --compact-vignettes="gs+qpdf" gRbase and in the log from r-devel (on winbuilder) I get * checking sizes of PDF files under 'inst/doc' ... WARNING 'gs+qpdf' made some significant size reductions: compacted 'gRbase-arrays.pdf' from 421Kb to 115Kb consider

[Env: OS: Win Xp; R 2.15.2; IDE: eclipse/StatET] Each time I update my heplots package, I get warnings from R CMD check on R-Forge, * checking sizes of PDF files under ?inst/doc? ... WARNING ?gs+qpdf? made some significant size reductions: compacted ?HE-examples.pdf? from 739Kb to 366Kb and upon submission to CRAN, a message from maintainers: On CRAN now: but again there were warnings

Dear List, There seems to be an bug in compactPDF() or at least an inconsistency with the documented behaviour. The documentations states: Details: This by default makes use of ?qpdf?, available from <URL: http://qpdf.sourceforge.net/>, including a Windows binary. If ?gs_cmd? is non-empty, GhostScript is used. I don't have qpdf on my system so planned to use

Dear all, I run R CMD build --compact-vignettes="both" gRbase and/or R CMD build --compact-vignettes="gs+qpdf" gRbase and in the log from r-devel (on winbuilder) I get * checking sizes of PDF files under 'inst/doc' ... WARNING 'gs+qpdf' made some significant size reductions: compacted 'gRbase-arrays.pdf' from 421Kb to 115Kb consider

Dear all, I run R CMD build --compact-vignettes="both" gRbase and/or R CMD build --compact-vignettes="gs+qpdf" gRbase and in the log from r-devel (on winbuilder) I get * checking sizes of PDF files under 'inst/doc' ... WARNING 'gs+qpdf' made some significant size reductions: compacted 'gRbase-arrays.pdf' from 421Kb to 115Kb consider

? Sun, 13 Oct 2024 12:45:36 +0200 "Jean-Louis Abitbol" <abitbol at sent.com> ?????: > WARNING: > /Users/jla/Library/CloudStorage/Dropbox/7cordas/Caio/record/90 NEW > RODA SONG BOOK.pdf (object 254 0): object has offset 0 > > This does not prevent from getting the pages extracted properly and > written to a pdf file which is readable. > How can I detect and

On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 6:55 AM, Tom Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> wrote: > As pointed out, this is no longer an issue in R 3.1.2, which is in all > Fedora branches (except 21, where it is landing later today, hopefully). Thank you. Another missing dependency pops up when running CMD check: * checking compiled code ... OK WARNING ?qpdf? is needed for checks on size

This question was posed on SO : https://stackoverflow.com/questions/58118495/passing-extra-argumenets-to-devtoolsbuild but there has been no useful reply. Something seems to have changed in the |devtools|package, so that the following commands, that used to run now give an error I can't decipher: |>Sys.setenv(R_GSCMD="C:/Program

Hello all, I'm trying to build R 32bit from source in a Windows 64 machine. I have followed the steps in "R Installation and Adiministration" ( http://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/R-admin.html#Getting-the-source-files) or at least I think I did everything described. I am not sure if I have installed the libjpeg, libtiff and libpng files though. I have upzipped them in the

L.S. The Ubuntu precise builds of R 2.15.3 at http://cran.r-project.org/bin/linux/ubuntu/precise/ have names for the r-base package that seem erroneous r-base_2.15.3-1precise0precise1.diff.gz 02-Mar-2013 14:09 79K r-base_2.15.3-1precise0precise1.dsc 02-Mar-2013 14:09 2.4K r-base_2.15.3-1precise0precise1_all.deb 02-Mar-2013 17:49 37K Should this be r-base_2.15.3-1precise1.diff.gz

I would like to include a Mathematica notebook and cdf file (both are ASCII files) in the \inst\doc directory as supporting documentation. These files are not large, about 340K each one. When I check using R CMD check --as-cran ... I get the following warning: ...................... * checking data for ASCII and uncompressed saves ... OK WARNING 'qpdf' is needed for checks on size

Hi Avraham, What a coincidence, I have been following this post of yours: https://www.avrahamadler.com/2013/10/24/an-openblas-based-rblas-for-windows-64-step-by-step/ Looks like this post is slightly older than what you have shared previously. It is strange that you did not get the attachments. I am pasting the contents of the MkRules.local here:

It looks like the most recent SVN commit changed line 1068 of src/library/tools/R/admin.R to include a call to "shQuotee" (sic), which is now breaking Travis r-devel builds ... ('checking sizes of PDF files under ?inst/doc?: .Error in shQuotee(tf) : could not find function "shQuotee"') The new line reads: res <- system2(qpdf, c(qpdf_flags, shQuote(p),

?did this inside R; not ideal but worked. ________________________________ From: R-devel <r-devel-bounces at r-project.org> on behalf of S?ren H?jsgaard <sorenh at math.aau.dk> Sent: 08 July 2018 15:46 To: r-devel at r-project.org Subject: Re: [Rd] [R] consider running tools::compactPDF(gs_quality = "ebook") Dear all, I run R CMD build --compact-vignettes="both"

Thanks for looking into it, your approach sounds good to me. See also R_has_methods_attached() (https://github.com/wch/r-source/blob/42ecf5f492a005f5398cbb4c9becd4aa5af9d05c/src/main/objects.c#L258-L265). I'm fine with Rscript not loading "methods", as long as everything works properly with "methods" loaded but not attached. -Kirill On 19.04.2016 04:10, Michael

>>>>> Kirill M?ller <kirill.mueller at ivt.baug.ethz.ch> >>>>> on Thu, 8 Jun 2017 12:55:26 +0200 writes: > On 06.06.2017 22:14, Kirill M?ller wrote: >> >> >> On 06.06.2017 10:07, Martin Maechler wrote: >>>>>>>> Kirill M?ller <kirill.mueller at ivt.baug.ethz.ch> on

See also .isMethodsDispatchOn, which is what trace uses to decide if the methods package needs to be loaded. ~G On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 5:34 AM, Michael Lawrence <lawrence.michael at gene.com > wrote: > Not sure why R_has_methods_attached() exists. Maybe Martin could shed > some light on that. > > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 11:50 PM, Kirill M?ller > <kirill.mueller at