similar to: R help-classification accuracy of DFA and RF using caret

Hi: I need some help. I am ploting a bar graph but I can't adjust my x axis scale I use this code: i <- qplot(ForkLength,Number,data=FL,geom="bar") i + geom_bar(colour="blue",fill="grey65") # too crowded FL_dat <- ggplot(FL,aes(x=ForkLength,y=Number)) + geom_bar(colour="green",fill="grey65") FL_dat +

Author: keerthi Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: 02abb98de0d64950ccf922e93b5f29cce65c46c9 Log message: 6297318 Orphan dfA files found on cascading SUN print host Files: update: usr/src/lib/print/job.c update: usr/src/lib/print/misc.c

Dear all, I am trying to do a n-fold cross-validation for a regularized discrimant function analysis using rda from the package klaR. However, I have problems to predict the groups from the test/validation sample. The exmaples of the R documantation and some online webpage also do not work. Does anybody know what I have done wrong? Here my code # I want to use the first 6 observations for

Ivan, Thanks for working on the DFA generator. I'll take a look at the changes in detail but from your description, I like the general nature of the modifications. -Anshu --- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc is a member of the Code Aurora Forum On 6/14/2012 8:22 AM, Ivan Llopard wrote: > Hi, > > I've refactored the DFA generator in TableGen because it takes too > much

Hi Ivan, > I missed last 2 commits made by Alexey. Following his advices, I > updated the patch. It should be ok now. > Thanks Anshu! > > I've recently added more functional units to our Schedule.td and the > generation time became painfully long. In fact, the main problem was > in writeTableAndAPI(). I propose another patch to fix it: > - Fixed memory leaks. > -

Hi Ivan, The patch looks good to me. I have a couple of minor comments: +void State::AddInsnClass(unsigned InsnClass, Add a top level comment describing the function + std::map<State*, std::set<Transition*, ltTransition>, ltState> stateTransitions; You should be able to use SmallSet here. Also, this line exceeds 80 columns. On a related note, is the CachedTable mechanism in

Ivan, Thanks for working on the patch. It looks good to me except for the removal of the Transition class: > (1) Should I completely remove Transition and create a map structure in State (input, state) to replace them? Yes, please remove the Transition class and create a map structure in State instead of TransitionSet. Thanks -Anshu On 8/25/2012 6:42 AM, Ivan Llopard wrote: > Hi

Hello list friends, I got the following error during yum update. How should I proceed to eliminate the probelm? (I thought perhaps to uninstall the .i386 package -- but there are some 15-20 other packages depending on it...) Repositories: dries, kbs-CentOS-Extras, update, rpmforge, base, addons, extras FWIW: the protectbase plugin was added on 2006-07-10. Thanks in advance, Itay

Guys, I'm migrating an internal Mediawiki over to a new CentOS 4 system. The old server's running FC3 and has a tarball install, ideally I want to stick to properly packaged software as far as possible. [wmcdonald at willspc ~]$ yum deplist mediawiki Finding dependencies: Setting up repositories Reading repository metadata in from local files package: mediawiki.i386 1.4.7-1.2.el4.rf

I'm getting the following dependency problem. Please advise how to resolve. Running 5.5 with latest kernel and all updates. Tried getting this one to update and can't - what am I missing? 18:02:57 : Packages to update 18:02:57 : ---> libcaca-0.99-0.1.beta17.el5.rf.i386 18:02:57 : Preparing for install/remove/update 18:02:57 : --> Preparing for a full update 18:02:57 : -->

Once upon a time, m.roth at 5-cent.us <m.roth at 5-cent.us> said: > Excerpt: > Running rm -rf / on any UEFI Linux distribution can potentially > perma-brick your system. Did someone think running "rm -rf /" is a good idea? > Ok, *now* tell me why we shouldn't hate systemd? This has zero to do with systemd. This is a by-product of how the kernel driver and

On Mon, 1 Feb 2016 13:44:48 -0600 Chris Adams wrote: > Did someone think running "rm -rf /" is a good idea? Quote from one of the people who commented on that article: QUOTE: You have this in a script: rm -rf "${DIRECTORY}"/ Now, you have a bug in the script and ${DIRECTORY} is not initialized. You then get rm -rf / executed. One should always ensure that DIRECTORY is

On Mon, February 1, 2016 1:33 pm, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > Excerpt: > Running rm -rf / on any UEFI Linux distribution can potentially > perma-brick your system. Yes, I kind of like "rm -rf /". If my memory doesn't fail me, long ago it was one of the tricky questions in sysadmin exam (not that anymore if I read what you, Michael, write further correctly...). Anyway,

wait. would deleting the inode /sys/(whatever) actually modify UEFI memory? sure, writing to those inodes could do all sorts of harm, but deleting the inodes in the /sys filesystem, I'm not so sure this isn't a tempest in a teapot so to speak. -- john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz

John R Pierce wrote: > wait. would deleting the inode /sys/(whatever) actually modify UEFI > memory? sure, writing to those inodes could do all sorts of harm, but > deleting the inodes in the /sys filesystem, I'm not so sure this isn't a > tempest in a teapot so to speak. It's going to get /boot. And under there, it'll get /boot/EFI. mark

On 2/1/2016 2:07 PM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > John R Pierce wrote: >> >wait. would deleting the inode/sys/(whatever) actually modify UEFI >> >memory? sure, writing to those inodes could do all sorts of harm, but >> >deleting the inodes in the /sys filesystem, I'm not so sure this isn't a >> >tempest in a teapot so to speak. > It's

On 02/01/2016 01:59 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > would deleting the inode /sys/(whatever) actually modify UEFI memory? Yes. That is how the UEFI management interface works.

On Mon, February 1, 2016 4:24 pm, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 02/01/2016 01:59 PM, John R Pierce wrote: >> would deleting the inode /sys/(whatever) actually modify UEFI memory? > > Yes. That is how the UEFI management interface works. Will doing rm -rf / actually delete anything in /sys? IMHO, not. The above command first will get to removing /dev, and it will delete /dev/sda1 or

On 02/01/2016 01:48 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > I just discovered that I couldn't even re-cite alphabet correctly today: > it is /bin that you loose, but /etc alphabetically goes after /dev, so > will not even loose your /etc, I'm pretty sure none of that is correct. Once "rm" launches, all of the libraries and files that it needs are memory mapped and reference

> -----Original Message----- > From: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On > Behalf Of m.roth at 5-cent.us > Sent: den 1 februari 2016 20:34 > To: CentOS > Subject: [CentOS] In A UEFI World, "rm -rf /" Can Brick Your System > > As a public service announcement, recursively removing all of your files > from / is no longer