similar to: echo 0> /selinux/enforce

Dear All, I have my puppet servers and clients on puppet 2.7.20 and I am planning to upgrade to the latest version. But the problem is that I have a lot of modules (downloaded from forge and few of my own) which used by hundreds of puppet clients. I need to know 1) Will the functionality of these modules get affected after this upgrade ? 2) Other than ritual of being on the latest verison, are

On NetBSD 6.99.28-CURRENT, nsd 3.2.16 works fine, however nsd 4.0.0 is spinning chewing CPU. The logs show: Nov 28 23:07:00 xxx nsd[466]: sendmmsg failed: Resource temporarily unavailable ktruss shows it getting EAGAIN from sendmmsg(2) over and over again. According to the man page: [EAGAIN|EWOULDBLOCK] The socket is marked non-blocking and the requested

Hello all, Was hoping to get a sanity check along with a question. Below is the output from top run with normal defaults, except to show both CPU's, on a SuSE 10.2 box with Asterisk v1.4.15. top - 10:00:58 up 3 days, 5:54, 4 users, load average: 0.15, 0.05, 0.01 Tasks: 110 total, 2 running, 108 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie Cpu0 : 0.2%us, 0.2%sy, 0.0%ni, 97.3%id, 2.2%wa, 0.1%hi, 0.0%si,

Hello All, I set up ltsp regulary, on Centos6 machines. This morning I have a Selinux problem that usualy does not occur: after setting everything up, the thinclients boot, but nobody can login. It only works after the command : # echo 0 > /selinux/enforce I tried this semanage command: # semanage fcontext -a -t bin_t /usr/bin/xauth but it makes no difference. The message I'm now

I ran "yum update" the other day on my dom0 and let it pull a new kernel. The RPM install scriptlet runs /sbin/new-kernel-pkg (part of the grubby package) to update grub.conf. It writes a new record to boot the Linux kernel instead of Xen. It would be nice if it noticed that it was running inside Xen and wrote a suitable record for that.

Hi, I'm implementing the built_vector as an IMPLICIT_DEF followed by INSERT_SUBREGs. This approach is the one of the SPARC architecture. def : Pat<(build_vector (f32 fpimm:$a1), (f32 fpimm:$a2)), (INSERT_SUBREG(INSERT_SUBREG (v2f32 (IMPLICIT_DEF)), (i32 (COPY_TO_REGCLASS (MOVSUTO_A_iSLo (bitcast_fpimm_to_i32 f32:$a1)), FPUaOffsetClass)), A_UNIT_PART),

??? Hi, I'm facing a challenge with selinux and because I don't got an explanation elsewhere, I'm trying to explain here. I have decided to mount /var/spool/cron on a separate partition? and apply quota for regular users. But quotacheck replyes with a "permission denied" . quotacheck: Cannot create new quotafile /var/spool/cron/aquota.user.new: Permission denied

Hi all, I'm using trunk version of LLVM/CLANG. When I compile attached files on my 64-bit Ubuntu 10.04 LTS system as follows: clang -O2 -g check.c main.c -o check64 When I do gdb check64 and set a breakpoint to the check routine and executes to the breakpoint, I've got: Breakpoint 1, check (result=0x601110, expect=0x601020, n=53) at check.c:7 7 { As you can see I can inspect

On 4/12/2018 8:01 AM, Dominique Torette via llvm-dev wrote: > > But there is one small issue in the inference of RegisterClass of the > implicitly defined register. > > As shown below, the %vreg6<def> is implicitly defined as FPUabRegisterClass. > > This register class accepts the v2f32 type, but for others addressing > mode context this register should be

I read enourmous comment about this questions stating that it was answered before.? I?have been looking for the answer for a week without luck !!!? I searched the archives the xts. vignitte , googled for an answer but couldn't find one so her it is: ? the Vignette states that xts "doesn't inforce the duplicate row requirement" but yet when I try to bring in tick stock data from

Hi James, clang is able to generate correct debug informations for 64-bit target at -O2. My feeling, given some other experiments I've done, is that debug information generated for x86 32-bit might be broken for parameters as long as they are not 'homed' in the code (local copy to an automatic variable). It seems that when llvm.declare is turned into a llvm.value for parameter there

Hi James, I fully agree with you and understand your statement about -O2. Now some questions for you: Did you try to reproduce experiments described in my previous e-mail ? Did you look at debug informations generated for 'n' parameter on x86 32-bit & x86 64-bit ? I'm working on my own front-end for LLVM and I had difficulties with debug information when they are related to x86

On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 6:50 AM, Seb <babslachem at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi James, > > I fully agree with you and understand your statement about -O2. > > Now some questions for you: > Did you try to reproduce experiments described in my previous e-mail ? > Did you look at debug informations generated for 'n' parameter on x86 32-bit > & x86 64-bit ? >

Firstly, let me just say I am new to asterisk and if anything I've said is covered in an FAQ or in previous posts I apologise but I have tried searching and I've attempted a few of the things I found but they didn't help. Has anybody got any experience using an X100P on an NTL phone line in the UK (I'm in an ex Cable & Wireless area if that makes any difference). The

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 [Please CC me on answers, I'm not subscribed] Hi everyone, I have got a hard disk which was damaged by a fall and would like to recover a few files from that. (There is a backup for most of the data, but a handful of recent files are missing. These are important enough to spend some time on them, but not for paying a professional data recovery

When I enable callprogress I get this error message... (when I call, it will ring forever but asterisk is acting as if it DID pick up the line ... but it never did... ) I'm beginning to think that asterisk can't hangup the line when in voice mail and this, whatever action I'll take... Actually, callprogress doesn't seem to work at all... (in my case) Mar 24 23:37:28

Hi Pogo & James, Pogo, that is exactly the kind of answer I was expecting. Thanks for the time you spend on this problem. I myself did also some experimenst and found way to get what I'm expecting but I think that at least for x86 or any parameter passed on the stack for a different architecture the way LLVM handle debug information might be a problem. So here was the situation: My

Hi, I've been experimenting with using Lazy_Expunge as a tool to enforce document retention policies (by keeping users from deleting emails forever, instead expiring them after a set time). My problem is, how do I keep the user from deleting/expunging mails *inside the expunge folder itself*? I am using dovecot-1.2.10 built from FreeBSD's ports tree, and I am using the following

Hello all, While configuring the latest stable version of Dovecot (1.0.3), I've noticed that "deliver" always uses the quota arguments found in the configuration file, completely ignoring what userdb sends to it through the authentication service. This doesn't happen in the previous version I was used (1.0.rc15, comes with Debian "etch"). After digging a little into

minios: fix and enforce block_domain atomicity To ensure that the timer event is not lost, block_domain requires that event delivery is disabled. SCHEDOP_block re-enables them, so for coherency (and fixing a bug actually), we should re-disable them after. Also, make sure that the caller disabled them. Signed-off-by: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@eu.citrix.com> diff -r 4965e711fee8