similar to: Very slow network speed using Tinc

Hi all, I have two nodes, connected to a switch, using Tinc 1.1 from git. They connect each other with sptps, and to other nodes in the Internet with old protocol because they have Tinc 1.0. There is no problem with remote nodes, but between my 2 local nodes, they see 1518 PMTU. But local network is 1500 MTU !!! So nodes can ping each other but larger data does not go. test1=sllm1 test2=sllm2

On 7 December 2015 at 17:20, Florent B <florent at coppint.com> wrote: > I have a cluster of 5 nodes, running Proxmox 4, and Tinc as "virtual > switch" for my nodes : on each node, a bridge "vmbr1" where Tinc is > connected, provides me a secured network for my VMs (connected to that > bridge). > > When I move (hot move) a VM from a host to another, I

Hello everyone, I''m a newbie experimenting with CBQ shaping and am facing a few problems. Can any of you please help? TEST SETUP: +---------------+ +----------------+ | 10.0.0.103 |----------->| 10.0.0.102 | +---------------+ +----------------+ 10.0.0.103: Linux, 100Mbit/s NIC 10.0.0.102: Windows, 100Mbit/s NIC, iperf tcp server (ports 2000 and 2001) WHAT I

Hi List. First post, be gentle please. Is there any limit in the linux UDP rate? I am using linux kernel 2.6 and iperf to measure bandwidth between two endpoints connected by 100 Mbits ethernet. Running (as root) iperf -u -s and iperf -u -c always gives me 1.05 Mbits/seg even when runned in the same machine. Can somebody clarify this? Thanks in advance. Sebastian

Hello, I have problem with lost packets in tinc connection. I have tinc VPN with about 60 nodes (central node with tinc 1.0.20 and 59 nodes with tinc 1.0.9 connecting with central). Everything works fine except 2 nodes. In this nodes I observed about 90 % packet loss in connection to central. In the logs (debug level 5) I don't see any errors. I tested connection with iperf (server in

Dear best guys, I really love 5.3 in many ways but here're some unbelievable transfer rates, after I went out and bought a pair of Intel GigaBit Ethernet Cards to solve my performance problem (*laugh*): (In short, see *** below) Tests were done with two Intel GigaBit Ethernet cards (82547EI, 32bit PCI Desktop adapter MT) connected directly without a switch/hub and "device

I set up a domU as a backup server, but it has very, very poor network performance with external computers. I ran some tests with iperf and found some very weird results. Using iperf, I get these approximate numbers (the left column is the iperf client and the right column is the iperf server): domU --> domU 1.77 Gbits/sec (using 127.0.0.1) domU --> domU 1.85 Gbits/sec (using domU

I set up a domU as a backup server, but it has very, very poor network performance with external computers. I ran some tests with iperf and found some very weird results. Using iperf, I get these approximate numbers (the left column is the iperf client and the right column is the iperf server): domU --> domU 1.77 Gbits/sec (using 127.0.0.1) domU --> domU 1.85 Gbits/sec (using domU

I have a Dell server with four bonded, gigabit interfaces. Bonding mode is 802.3ad, xmit_hash_policy=layer3+4. When testing this setup with iperf, I never get more than a total of about 3Gbps throughput. Is there anything to tweak to get better throughput? Or am I running into other limits (e.g. was reading about tcp retransmit limits for mode 0). The iperf test was run with iperf -s on the

Hi Guus, I am wondering why MACExpire was introduced in: ,---- | commit 14979f835df4214a7c2510852f7ffedc9e08c2c0 | Author: Guus Sliepen <guus at tinc-vpn.org> | Date: Fri Mar 1 14:09:31 2002 +0000 | | - Global time_t now, so that we don't have to call time() too often. | - MAC addresses expire after a time configurable by MACExpire (default 600 | seconds) `---- Is

Hi, At my provider (xs4all) I've got an ipv6 tunnel working. Now I would like to distribute ipv6 via the tinc tunnel. My tinc.conf: ------------ Name=server AddressFamily=ipv4 Device=/dev/net/tun PrivateKeyFile=/etc/tinc/fvhglobalnet/rsa_key.priv GraphDumpFile=|/usr/bin/dot -Tpng -o /var/www/htdocs.keetweej.vanheusden.com/stats/tinc-fvh-network-graph.png Mode=switch KeyExpire=299

Just reporting some iperf results. In each case, Dom0 is iperf server, DomU is iperf client: (1) Dom0: Intel Core2 3.16 GHz, CentOS 5.2, xen 3.0.3. DomU: Windows XP SP3, GPLPV 0.9.12-pre13, file based. Iperf: 1.17 Gbits/sec (2) Dom0: Intel Core2 2.33 GHz, CentOS 5.2, xen 3.0.3. DomU: Windows XP SP3, GPLPV 0.9.12-pre13, file based. Iperf: 725 Mbits/sec (3) Dom0: Intel Core2 2.33 GHz,

Hi guys, I''m running a freenas domU (FreeBSD 8.3 based, ZFS v28, 2 vcpus mapped to the same HT capable core) to serve storage for all purpose including other domUs running on the same host. I did some study to understand how well it works and the result is kind of confusing. In summary, the network performance between domains on the same host is worse than expected. And NFS service to

Hi there, I got a question regarding throughput performance using linux 2.4.5.1. My setup is very simple : I have two laptops with a wireless card. On each laptop I configure the wireless cards to be in ad hoc mode, create a bridge and include the interface within the bridge (stp is off). Then of course I'm assigning an IP address to the bridge while assigning 0.0.0.0 to the wireless

Hi there, I was asking this question already a few days go, but I'm not sure whether anyone noticed due to the mailserver outtage. So I'm just re-posting it, sorry, but it's an important issue for me, I would be glad to hear some insight on this. The question is regarding throughput performance using linux 2.4.5.1. My setup is very simple : I have two laptops with a wireless card.

Hi there! I am working a lot with VoIP in my company, so I thought to use linux bridge functionality together with tc to emulate delay, jitter, packet loss, duplication, reordering etc. for testing purposes in our lab against our VoIP products. I just recognized, that a basic bridge just with it''s minumum configuration of 2 network interfaces creates latency of approx. 5ms on very low

Hello list, I have two differents installation Xen Hypervisor on two identical physical server, on the same switch : The problem is on my new server (Xen 4.0.1 with pvops kernel 2.6.32.24), I have bad performance on bandwidth I have test with a files copy and "iperf". Result iperf average: Transfert Bandwidth XEN-A -> Windows

Hi, We are running on 5.5 on a HP ProLiant DL360 G6. Kernel version is 2.6.18-194.17.1.el5 (we had also tested with the latest available kernel kernel-2.6.18-238.1.1.el5.x86_64) We running some performance tests using the "iperf" utility. We are seeing very bad and inconsistent performance on the UDP testing. The maximum we could get, was 440 Mbits/sec, and it varies from 250 to 440

Hello, My first post on Xen-Users, so .. i''ve discovered a strange problem. Setup: -A Windows server 2003R2 (x86) with GPL PV driver 0.9.9 ipferf 1.7.0 (from 2003) -dom0 a opensuse 11.0 xen: # rpm -q -a |grep -i xen kqemu-kmp-xen-1.3.0pre11_2.6.25.5_1.1-7.1 kiwi-desc-xenboot-2.38-67.1 xen-3.2.1_16881_04-4.2 xen-tools-3.2.1_16881_04-4.2 xen-libs-3.2.1_16881_04-4.2