similar to: ѴḹäǤℝä

Full_Name: Michael Aaron Karsh Version: 2.8.0 OS: Windows XP Submission from: (NULL) (75.61.109.172) I tried using the lm function to regress the third column listed below on the second column listed below. It gave me an error message. My code is below. > HDISWLSdata=read.table("RHDISWLS.txt") > HDISWLSdata V1 V2 V3 1 DENMARK

Hello, I am very new in R so I am so sorry for this question. I have the Barro-Lee data set which contains 98 countries and I want to run the regressions only for the Latin America countries, so what do you recomend? How can I delete all the other countries or how can I select the countries of Lat. Am. thank you this is the list of countries SHCODE COUNTRY NAME WBCTRY

Dear sirs, When I try to join my domain I get the error message "The specified network password is not correct" When I use a knowingly wrong password I get an error message in style with "Unkown user or incorrect password" I have set registry keys [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\Netlogon\Parameters] "requiresignorseal"=dword:00000000

Hello all, Wonder if there was away to run a script/marco when the person who originates the call hangs up. I have use the g option in the dial application to continue running applications in the dial plan, but that only works if the person who is called hangs up first.. Thanks Erik

Hi, A glance at sourceforge.net/projects/openh323 Help Forum made me wonder if this location is the one to use (I got trouble in the past when google pointed to an obsolete site) : some quite old messages remain unanswered. Cheers -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi, I'm trying to make some changes in a vector according to some conditions. It takes too long time however with vector length > 100000 and I guess a better way would be using the apply function. I cannot sort out how, however.  As a for/if loop: for (i in 1:length(PrH)) { if (is.finite(PrH[i]) == F & tempHER > tempSPR) {PrH[i] <- 1 } if (is.finite(PrH[i]) == F & tempHER <

Hi, I want to be able to specify actions for different classes of traffic in any of these four ways, and I''d like to use only HTB if possible: 1. No guranteed rate, No ceil 2. Guaranteed rate, No ceil 3. No guranteed rate, Ceil specified 4. Guaranteed rate, Ceil specified For types 2, 3 and 4 there can be several classes of each, with different rates and ceilings. 4 is ofcourse easy.

There is a lot of talk about the vulnerable Linux kernel. I'm simply wondering the telltale signs if a given system has been hacked? What, specifically, does a person look for? Thanks. Scott

I am going to buy some IP phones from them but I sent them an email couple of weeks ago and got no reply. Has anyone ordered anything from them? Any other places that I can buy from? Sorry if it's a wrong post. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20050517/ba256d25/attachment.htm

Hi all, I''m fighting with the after_fork hook and my sinatra application. The Sinatra app is using active_record, In my unciron.rb file I''m using preload_app true after_fork do |server, worker| ? defined?(ActiveRecord::Base) and ??? ActiveRecord::Base.establish_connection End but I always get the error: ERROR -- : ActiveRecord::AdapterNotSpecified

Switched my RoR (3.1.3, 1.9.2) app from Thin to Unicorn (4.6.2). It ran fine in development (Mac OSX), but when deploying to production on Heroku, it fails silently (no backtrace, no error detail). Log looks like: Starting process with command `bundle exec unicorn start -p 6069 -c ./config/unicorn.rb` /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/1.9.1/gems/unicorn-4.6.2/lib/unicorn/configurator.rb:634:in

Hi, I have a samba +ldap PDC running on mandrake 10.0 the server is running great except for the error mesage in the kernel log, whic I think causes the system to crash after some time, how much time is needed is unknown, but it seems to get faster with increasing user, as this was a first attempt I first tried it with only less than 10 users, and it the server would go on for more than 3

Hi Due to putting a DVD in my Virtual Machine Host Computer which then filled the logs with errors and subsequently filled the drive crashing all vms. Luckily I had a backup of the DC image which I restored and some machines just worked and some can?t find KDC kinit: Cannot contact any KDC for realm 'BALEWAN.UNICORN.COM' while getting initial credentials I have tried leaving the domain

Hi, i''m trying to start up unicorn_rails with a rails 3 beta3 project. All I can get out of it is this: I, [2010-05-28T08:54:45.770957 #17852] INFO -- : reaped #<Process::Status: pid 17854 exit 1> worker=0 I, [2010-05-28T08:54:45.771200 #17852] INFO -- : worker=0 spawning... I, [2010-05-28T08:54:45.774049 #17858] INFO -- : worker=0 spawned pid=17858 I,

This allows users to start an independent instance of unicorn on a the same port as a running unicorn (as long as both instances use :reuseport). ref: https://lwn.net/Articles/542629/ --- lib/unicorn/configurator.rb | 19 +++++++++++++++++++ lib/unicorn/socket_helper.rb | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------- test/unit/test_socket_helper.rb | 8 ++++++++ 3 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 8

This means we no longer waste an extra file descriptor per worker process in the master. Now there''s no need to set a higher file descriptor limit for systems running >= 1024 workers. --- I just pushed this out to git://bogomips.org/unicorn.git and it''ll be in Unicorn 4.x. The subset of raindrops used by Unicorn should work on all machines with mmap(2) +

Hi, I''m deploying Unicorn on a Rails application with RUnit. Technically I''m using Chef''s deployment tools, if any of you are familiar with it (https://github.com/opscode-cookbooks/application_ruby) but to be clear they aren''t doing anything magical, so this is purely an issue with RUnit and Unicorn. The TL;DR of the following post, which has lots of

Signaling using normal kill(2) is preserved, but the master now prefers to signal workers using a pipe rather than kill(2). Non-graceful signals (:TERM/:KILL) are still sent using kill(2), as they ask for immediate shutdown. This change is necessary to avoid triggering the ubf (unblocking function) for rb_thread_call_without_gvl (and similar) functions extensions. Most notably, this fixes

I am wondering if there are any apps affected by this bug (and perhaps keeping people from switching Unicorn). It''s a fairly esoteric case, so I probably won''t make another release until tomorrow (sleepy now, will probably screw something else up or realize something else is broken :) Anyways it''s pushed out to master and 1.1.x-stable in case people want^Wneed it

Strange error which took down my server today: Unhandled listen loop exception #<Errno::EMFILE: Too many open files - accept>. /usr/local/ruby-enterprise-1.8.7-2010.01/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/unicorn-3.3.1/lib/unicorn/http_server.rb:606:in `kgio_tryaccept'' /usr/local/ruby-enterprise-1.8.7-2010.01/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/unicorn-3.3.1/lib/unicorn/http_server.rb:606:in