similar to: Rails 4.0.1.rc1 has been released!

We found two regressions. One on Active Record and one on Action Pack. Took some time to fix those issues so the release was delayed until today. Here are the changes from 4.0.1.rc3 to 4.0.1.rc4: https://github.com/rails/rails/compare/v4.0.1.rc3...v4.0.1.rc4 And the changes from 4.0.0 to 4.0.1: https://github.com/rails/rails/compare/v4.0.0...v4.0.1.rc4 If we don''t hit any more

This is a delivery failure notification message indicating that an email you sent could not be delivered. The problem appears to be : -- Recipient email server rejected the message This condition occurred after 1 attempt(s) to deliver over a period of 0 hour(s). If you sent the email to multiple recipients, you will receive one of these messages for each one which failed delivery, otherwise

Hi everyone, I am happy to announce that Rails 4.0.4.rc1 has been released. This is a bug fix release and includes more than 290 commits. If no regressions are found we will release 4.0.4 final this Friday, on March 14, 2014. If you find one, please open an Issue on GitHub and mention me (@rafaelfranca) on it, so that we can fix it before the final release. ## CHANGES since 4.0.3 To view the

Go to [1], click on CentOS, the README.txt has links to the CentOS Storage SIG where you can find information on installing RPMs from the CentOS Storage SIG. On 03/27/2018 08:53 PM, Thing wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks, any howtos/docs/notes for installing gluster4.0.x on Centos 7 > please? > > On 27 March 2018 at 01:28, Shyam Ranganathan <srangana at redhat.com >

Hi, Thanks, yes, not very familiar with Centos and hence googling took a while to find a 4.0 version at, https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Storage On 28 March 2018 at 14:37, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY <kkeithle at redhat.com> wrote: > > Go to [1], click on CentOS, the README.txt has links to the CentOS > Storage SIG where you can find information on installing RPMs from the

I think we are missing 3.12.7 in CentOS releases. On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 4:47 AM, Niels de Vos <ndevos at redhat.com> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 02:57:55PM +1300, Thing wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Thanks, yes, not very familiar with Centos and hence googling took a while >> to find a 4.0 version at, >> >>

The Gluster community is pleased to announce the release of Gluster 4.0.1 (packages available at [1]). Release notes for the release can be found at [2]. Thanks, Gluster community [1] Packages: https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/4.0/4.0.1/ [2] Release notes: https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/blob/v4.0.1/doc/release-notes/4.0.1.md

Hi, Thanks, any howtos/docs/notes for installing gluster4.0.x on Centos 7 please? On 27 March 2018 at 01:28, Shyam Ranganathan <srangana at redhat.com> wrote: > The Gluster community is pleased to announce the release of Gluster > 4.0.1 (packages available at [1]). > > Release notes for the release can be found at [2]. > > Thanks, > Gluster community > > [1]

On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 02:57:55PM +1300, Thing wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks, yes, not very familiar with Centos and hence googling took a while > to find a 4.0 version at, > > https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Storage The announcement for Gluster 4.0 in CentOS should contain all the details that you need as well:

Last night a friend of mine started ranting about validates_presence_of :boolean_field returning not valid when the boolean field is false. I checked the rails issues and this seems to be a pretty common concern about the naming of ''presence'' . Instead of changing the behaviour of the presence validator, I was wondering if maybe the answer to avoid such misconceptions could be

1. Attempt to load Nexenta under 2.6.32.16-1.2.108.xendom0.fc13.x86_64 Xen 4.0.1-rc6-pre & 2.6.32.16-1.2.108.xendom0.fc13.x86_64 on top F13 [root@fedora13 NexentaStor-Community-3.0.2]# uname -a Linux fedora13 2.6.32.16-1.2.108.xendom0.fc13.x86_64 #1 SMP Fri Jul 23 17:09:30 MSD 2010 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux [root@fedora13 NexentaStor-Community-3.0.2]# xm create -c

(I posted this as a bug in GitHub (https://github.com/rails/rails/issues/7018), but then someone there told me I should post it here, so here it is.) If you set attr_accessible on some properties in an ActiveRecord-descended class, and then attr_protected on others - the class becomes ''default-open'' - if any properties are missed or added later, they will be accessible by

There''s a small inconsistency in ActiveRecord''s callback syntax that has tripped me up before. It wouldn''t be a big deal, but it can lead to a silent failure. I''d like to suggest that it either be made consistent or be made to fail loudly. The issue is that to do something before validating, but only when creating, you use `before_validation on: :create`,

Just putting this out there before I make a pull request. Is there any interest in an asset_url method as a view helper? It would work by using the config.action_controller.asset_host if it exists and prepending this to the results of asset_path. I have found this necessary when writing html emails and needing a full url path for assets. Since my CDN in the asset_host mirrors my assets in my

I suggest that if you don''t pass any args to ActiveRecord#pluck, it would use the select values. This follows along well with the way other AR::Calculations work. As an extra benefit we would be able to pluck virtual columns. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To view this discussion on the web visit

Hello, i am getting the following error in CentOS 64 bit with php 5.2 I cant get mysql functionality running and the ioncube loader Please help, i am very desperate Here is my output: [root at host ~]# php -v Failed loading /usr/local/ioncube/ioncube_loader_lin_5.1.so: /usr/local/ioncube/ioncube_loader_lin_5.1.so: undefined symbol: zend_unmangle_property_name_ex PHP Warning: PHP

Just that: class Date > def remaining_to(date) > if date.acts_like? :date > date - self > end > end > alias :days_to end and then be able to do this: Date.today.remaining_to(Date.parse ''2014-04-02'').days.seconds -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To

Hey everyone, first of all, thank you for the tremendous work and effort on making Rails more awesome every day. I''ve brought up this "issue" on Github last Friday. [1] Steve Klabnik told me to bring the discussion here, as it''s more appropriate. The thing is, there is some amount of logic scattered around Rails (and its tests) that depends upon error/exception

Hi everyone I''m Kasper. One part of<http://weblog.rubyonrails.org/2013/5/27/rails-google-summer-of-code-projects/> the Rails Google Summer of Code participants. This means I will replace the venerable html-scanner with Loofah, picking up where this issue left off: https://github.com/rails/rails/issues/2550. Rafael França was assigned to that issue and he is my mentor during the

Hello! Are the plans of splitting ActionPack for several gems (AbstractController, ActionView, etc)? Like https://github.com/rails/rails/pull/7356 ... I.e. I know gems that are needed AbstractController only... And they are forced to require the whole ActionPack... Thanx. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To