similar to: Version problems

On Jan 31, 2011, at 7:27 PM, Óscar Fuentes wrote: >> >> If one is not supposed to use svn (the official blessed >> LLVM SCM) on "our side," pray tell, what _are_ we supposed to use? > > Because LLVM chose to use svn at some point on the past (when > distributed tools were not so mature and undestood as they are now) and > because there is no enough

I have two machines running 4.8-RELEASE ... both sitting on the same switch, same hardware, same everything really. One gets 200k/s using wget / curl / w3m to a http address the other gets 6k/s to the same address. On the slow http machine I get 200k/s via scp or ftp to the same address it's just web traffic that is slow (note web traffic to all other locations is 4 - 6k/s as well). I've

> > Now, I may be wrong, but I was under the impression that a call to > > InitializeNativeTarget was recommended, if not compulsory, so. why > > commenting it out not only makes my LLVM code still work, but also > > prevent my application from generating the above error.?! > > My bet is that your code is writing through a stray pointer. By removing the > call to

Hello all, I'm announcing python-markdown2 -- another Python implementation of Markdown. (MIT license.) http://code.google.com/p/python-markdown2/ It should be a drop-in replacement for [markdown.py](http://www.freewisdom.org/projects/python-markdown/). It fixes some issues that I ran into with markdown.py [^1]. I believe that it is faster than markdown.py [^2] and on par or a little

e.g. class Asset < ActiveRecord::Base validates_presence_of :asset_number, :make, :model, :location, :name, :serial_number validates_numericality_of :asset_number validates_uniqueness_of :asset_number belongs_to :user belongs_to :location belongs_to :asset_type, :foreign_key => ''type_id'' end class Location < ActiveRecord::Base validates_presence_of :name

Hi I see when LLVM builds the CallGraph SCCs. a function calling through a function pointer is conservatively assumed to call internal and external functions. Therefore, it has an edges pointing to the externalnode2, ie. the externalnode representing outgoing calls from this module. does LLVM have any function pointer analysis capabilities in the mainline ? Thanks, -Trent

Hello all I''m using Ferret for a site wide search where I have several kinds of (similar) objects in a central index (using a "type" field containing the class name). This works great, and I can search all objects with one query. What I''d like to do now is to limit the results so that there will be a maximum of 10 (or 5 or whatever) results for each type.. I

I have a list of TimeSheet objects from an ealier AR query, which I can sort by the full name of the user like so: @time_sheet_entries.sort! { |a,b| a.user.full_name <=> b.user.full_name } I can sort by the started time like so: @time_sheet_entries.sort! { |a,b| a.start_time <=> b.start_time } My question is how do I do a sort so that the list is sorted primarily by user.full_name

I see that we do not inline a function marked as "always-inline" if it contains indirect branches ? what are the reasons behind this criterion ? Thanks Trent -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150129/92bf577a/attachment.html>

Hi, In a oVirt 3.4.4 environnement, and using a virt-p2v-0.9.1-2.20130730.1.el6.centos, I'm trying to convert a windows 2003 server 32 bits into an oVirt KVM image. I already succeed doing that many times, but now, this is failing : - All the usual process sounds good : PXE -> DHCP -> connection to the P2V server -> choosing the profile -> (checking the debug option) ->

Hello everyone, I have done my reading & research and everything I try is coming to different errors, so I am going to beg & pray someone here can help me with my problem. I appericiate any help in advance! I am running Samba 2.2.11 on a RedHat Linux 7.3 Server, connected to a network of Windows 2000 & XP Machines. I want to configure Samba to be the Domain Controller for my other

I''m getting an odd kernel panic which I cannot get the whole error for, I believe it has something to do with a designation for the root filesystem. About the time it would be mounting the root filesystem, there is a kernel panic and it reboots less than 1 second later. I have lokoed around for dmesg logs and tried using the magic PAUSE, but with no luck. Recommendations? I

lol On Feb 1, 2011, at 0:00, Chris Lattner wrote: > > On Jan 31, 2011, at 7:27 PM, Óscar Fuentes wrote: > >>> >>> If one is not supposed to use svn (the official blessed >>> LLVM SCM) on "our side," pray tell, what _are_ we supposed to use? >> >> Because LLVM chose to use svn at some point on the past (when >> distributed tools

Hi all ! Have anyone a resource / link for documentation to configure Asterisk to act as a SIP 2 PSTN gateway (ISDN PRI) ? Thx. Regads, Andreas. -- "If you want to pray. Go to the sea." ---------------------------------------------------------------- Andreas Czerniak <cognac@amcs.net> PGPkey http://pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xEDB224EC

Any big heads up folks can offer as I set off to try building me a 2.6.9 kernel from a kernel.org tarball? -- Robert Thomas ("beau") Hayes Link Open your heart, pray for peace, preach healing (c)2004ISR http://www.semanticrestructuring.com/

"Alan Garny" <alan.garny at dpag.ox.ac.uk> writes: > I have built a shared version of LLVM which I am now able to test in my > Qt-based application. It all works fine on Windows, Linux and Mac OS X, > except that whenever I exit my Qt-based application on Windows (everything > is fine on Linux and Mac OS X), I get a message that reads that "this > application

Ok - I gave up on trying to get CIFS to work - there's obviously stuff going on I don't understand. So - instead of trying to get a virtual server to work, I next tried a chroot. That worked...but imapsync error'ed out trying to handle one of my large mailboxes. I was trying to setup a "new" server, migrate all my mail over, verify everything worked - maybe even leave the

As Shorewall reaches maturity, it seems unlikely that the pace of development typical of the past 9 years will be sustained. Over that time, major releases have occurred approximately once per year; the last major release (4.4) was in August 2009. I do not currently have an active 4.5 development branch so it is very unlikely that we will see a 4.6 release this year. Going forward, I would

As Shorewall reaches maturity, it seems unlikely that the pace of development typical of the past 9 years will be sustained. Over that time, major releases have occurred approximately once per year; the last major release (4.4) was in August 2009. I do not currently have an active 4.5 development branch so it is very unlikely that we will see a 4.6 release this year. Going forward, I would

> > > Now, I may be wrong, but I was under the impression that a call to > > > InitializeNativeTarget was recommended, if not compulsory, so. why > > > commenting it out not only makes my LLVM code still work, but also > > > prevent my application from generating the above error.?! > > > > My bet is that your code is writing through a stray pointer.