similar to: Gluster 3.4 QEMU and Permission Denied Errors

Hi, I am quite new to asterisk so I am not sure what is needed to figure out this problem. If more information is needed and not provided I will gladly provide it. I have a very basic asterisk setup. 1 x100p card and a grandstream handytone 286. I can make calls fine to most phone numbers from the handytone device the trouble seems to come when I dial this number 591-1079. It puts me through to

So after reading the traffic control documentation at shorewall.net I am a little confused. I don''t understand how to use the tcrules file. What I would ideally like to do is setup htb on a per user basis (either by IP or MAC address). If anybody has any hints on the best way to do this or is willing to explain the use of tcrules file a little better (how I could mark it per IP or MAC)

I am making a new box to test with and was trying to install shorewall via rpm. So I download the shorewall 2.2.5 rpm and issue a rpm -ivh shorewall-2.2.5-1.noarch.rpm. I then get an error: error: Failed dependencies: which is needed by shorewall-2.2.5-1.noarch So as you can see there are no dependency issues. I thought I saw this on the mailing list a while ago but I just searched for it I did

Has anybody on this managed to get ChilliSpot and Shorewall to work together? I have managed to get it to work with the supplied firewall script but if I wanted to do my firewall like that I would not be using Shorewall. At any rate, I am having all kinds of trouble translating the supplied rules to something that Shorewall would understand. If anybody has already done it I would love to see the

I am trying to setup openVPN 2.0 beta11 (sever/client configuration) and shorewall. I managed to get it working with out shorewall in the mix. When I start shorewall this message appears in the logs. Oct 12 13:41:03 localhost kernel: Shorewall:net2all:DROP:IN=eth0 OUT= MAC=00:04:5a:7f:92:9f:00:b0:c2:89:68:e4:08:00 SRC=69.145.71.133 DST=216.187.138.18 LEN=42 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=46 ID=11 DF

Thank you Miguel for your comments -- that''s exactly awdwall was intended for... happy to share that point with you too. Best regards, - Andrea > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <mmiranda@americatel.com.sv> > To: <shorewall-users@lists.shorewall.net> > Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2005 12:34 AM > Subject: RE: [Shorewall-users] WebGUI Scripts

Problem: "Firewall" machine cannot get DNS but is allowing DNS through internally. Something changed with the configuration but we''re not sure what. Here is the pertinent info: Shorewall Status Entries Oct 5 09:24:50 all2all:REJECT:IN= OUT=eth2 SRC=192.168.7.55 DST=65.175.131.201 LEN=55 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=64 ID=50982 DF PROTO=UDP SPT=32973 DPT=53 LEN=35 Oct 5

Hi all, When trying to join a windows 7 box to a samba 3.5.4 acting as a PDC I am getting an error on the windows 7 box that says DNS_ERROR_NO_DNS_SERVERS (the full error log is included at bottom of mail). WinXP machines are able to join the domain fine, just not windows 7 boxes. My (sanitized) config is located is included at the bottom of the mail. I have tried doing the registry patches to

I have had Shorewall 2.0.8 up and running for a month or so. Now I need to change some things around. Currently I am running on a private IP scheme and Shorewall is setup based on the 3 interface guide. Now I want to change to a public scheme on my "loc" zone. I have a /24 block of public IP''s. I need my private scheme and public to co-exist so I currently have is eth1 (local)

On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 12:41 PM, <lemonnierk at ulrar.net> wrote: > > I'm thinking the following: > > > > gluster volume remove-brick datastore4 replica 2 > > vna.proxmox.softlog:/tank/vmdata/datastore4 force > > > > gluster volume add-brick datastore4 replica 3 > > vnd.proxmox.softlog:/tank/vmdata/datastore4 > > I think that should work

Status: We have a 3 node gluster cluster (proxmox based) - gluster 3.8.12 - Replica 3 - VM Hosting Only - Sharded Storage Or I should say we *had* a 3 node cluster, one node died today. Possibly I can recover it, in whcih case no issues, we just let it heal itself. For now its running happily on 2 nodes with no data loss - gluster for teh win! But its looking like I might have to replace the

So this is a little off topic but this list is so helpful!! Is this the correct way to split our /24 block up? Tom suggested something like this in an earlier post but that did not work either. So what should I change to make this work? Internet<===Shorewall Box===>router1<++++T1 Line++++>router2<==LAN I need a /28 on the Shorewall side of things and the rest on the LAN side of

Upgraded recently from 3.8.15 to 3.10.5 and have seen a fairly substantial drop in read/write perfomance env: - 3 node, replica 3 cluster - Private dedicated Network: 1Gx3, bond: balance-alb - was able to down the volume for the upgrade and reboot each node - Usage: VM Hosting (qemu) - Sharded Volume - sequential read performance in VM's has dropped from 700Mbps to 300mbs - Seq Write

Hi I'm trying to setup a 3 node gluster, and am hitting huge performance bottlenecks. The 3 servers are connected over 10GB and glusterfs is set to create a 3 node replica. With a single VM performance was poor, but I could have lived with it. I tried to stress it by putting copies of a bunch of VMs on the servers and seeing what happened with parallel nodes.. network load never broke

Dear Shorewall Users, having noticed that the request for a WebGUI is growing, after a very short conversation I''ve had with Tom, I''d like to let you all evaluate the Web interface to Shorewall I''ve written, integrating the original weblet package made available for the LRP project. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Preamble

> I'm thinking the following: > > gluster volume remove-brick datastore4 replica 2 > vna.proxmox.softlog:/tank/vmdata/datastore4 force > > gluster volume add-brick datastore4 replica 3 > vnd.proxmox.softlog:/tank/vmdata/datastore4 I think that should work perfectly fine yes, either that or directly use replace-brick ? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text

On 9/06/2017 9:56 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: > > > gluster volume remove-brick datastore4 replica 2 > > vna.proxmox.softlog:/tank/vmdata/datastore4 force > > > > gluster volume add-brick datastore4 replica 3 > > vnd.proxmox.softlog:/tank/vmdata/datastore4 > > I think that should work perfectly fine yes, either that > or

Hi, I have a 3 node cluster (Found1, Found2, Found2) which i wanted to upgrade I upgraded one node from 3.8.15 to 3.12.5 and now i am having multiple problems with the install. The 2 nodes not upgraded are still working fine(Found1,2) but the one upgraded has Peer Rejected (Connected) when peer status is run but it also has multiple brick that have "Transport endpoint is not connected"

According to the documentation there is a limit to marking of 255. Why is this? Can I work around it?

Hi, So is the KVM or Vmware as the host(s)? I basically have the same setup ie 3 x 1TB "raid1" nodes and VMs, but 1gb networking. I do notice with vmware using NFS disk was pretty slow (40% of a single disk) but this was over 1gb networking which was clearly saturating. Hence I am moving to KVM to use glusterfs hoping for better performance and bonding, it will be interesting to see