Displaying 20 results from an estimated 7000 matches similar to: "(no subject)"
2013 Sep 12
0
Dealing with muti-body INVITE
> Hi
>
> I am running following asterisk installed with apt on Debian 7.1.
>
> dpkg -l |grep asterisk
> ii asterisk 1:1.8.13.1~dfsg-3+deb7u1
> amd64 Open Source Private Branch Exchange (PBX)
> ii asterisk-config 1:1.8.13.1~dfsg-3+deb7u1
> all Configuration files for Asterisk
> ii
2013 Oct 22
3
Bug#727100: domain doesn't reboot with xl toolstack
Package: xen-utils-4.1
Version: 4.1.4-3+deb7u1
Severity: important
Tags: security patch
When you use xl toolstack, you can't reboot domUs.
When you switch back to xm toolstack, than reboot works again.
I think the problem with the debian packaged version is the same as in
this thread:
http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2011-09/msg01289.html
I also think it's a security issue,
2014 Apr 22
0
Bug#745419: Bug#745419: xen-utils-4.1: Pygrub fails to boot from LVM LV when something installed in the volume boot record
On Mon, 2014-04-21 at 15:43 +0200, Sjors Gielen wrote:
> Package: xen-utils-4.1
> Version: 4.1.4-3+deb7u1
> Severity: important
>
> When an LVM LV that serves as the root disk for a Xen DomU contains a boot
> loader (or possibly other data) in its volume boot record, pygrub fails to boot
> it, printing "Error: boot loader didn't return any data" before exiting.
2014 Apr 21
7
Bug#745419: xen-utils-4.1: Pygrub fails to boot from LVM LV when something installed in the volume boot record
Package: xen-utils-4.1
Version: 4.1.4-3+deb7u1
Severity: important
When an LVM LV that serves as the root disk for a Xen DomU contains a boot
loader (or possibly other data) in its volume boot record, pygrub fails to boot
it, printing "Error: boot loader didn't return any data" before exiting.
I think this is because of the function "is_disk_image" on line 45 of
2009 Jul 20
0
Error: Invalid SIP message - rejected , no call id
On about 25% of inbound calls to a ring group, picking up any one
extension as it rings results in dead air.
Some details regarding my VoIP network to make the following logs more
readable:
192.168.7.130 resolves to the trixbox host.
192.168.7.135 resolves to endpoint 812.
192.168.7.137 resolves to endpoint 811.
192.168.7.138 resolves to endpoint 810.
192.168.7.139 resolves to endpoint 813.
2013 Jan 04
0
T38MaxBitRate issue on fax passthrough
Having an issue with receiving faxes, but when I pass through the fax.
Currently, I receive the fax with Digium's Fax for Asterisk, store it and
the initiate an outbound call to our fax server. (XMedius Fax). This
works, but we would prefer to have Asterisk simply route the call directly
to the fax server and take the store and forward out of the equation.
When I do that, however, the
2013 Aug 30
1
Bug#721345: xcp-xapi: xl pci-attach is called by xapi in a PCI passthrough attempt. An error is raised due to the use of xapi and the PCI device cannot be attached to the VM.
Package: xcp-xapi
Version: 1.3.2-15
Severity: normal
I am trying to pass an SRIOV virtual function in a virtual machine but the attempt fails with the following errors shown in the xcp-xapi.log
[20130829T19:29:17.909Z|debug|sriov1|314 UNIX /var/lib/xcp/xapi|VM.start R:9e8e10bd31bb|pciops] PCI devices from other-config:pci to attach: 0/0000:04:00.1
[20130829T19:29:18.012Z|debug|sriov1|314 UNIX
2013 Jun 18
3
Bug#712661: xen-utils-common: xl start HVM domU instead of PV if disk placed on file
Package: xen-utils-common
Version: 4.1.4-3+deb7u1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
i changed toolkit to xl, after that i observe that my domU started as HVM domains.
I found same problem here: http://mail-index.netbsd.org/port-xen/2012/04/11/msg007216.html
When i manualy setup loop devices and specify it as disks in my VM conf file, domU started as PV.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 7.1
2017 Jun 06
0
Rebalance + VM corruption - current status and request for feedback
Hi,
Sorry i did't confirm the results sooner.
Yes, it's working fine without issues for me.
If anyone else can confirm so we can be sure it's 100% resolved.
--
Respectfully
Mahdi A. Mahdi
________________________________
From: Krutika Dhananjay <kdhananj at redhat.com>
Sent: Tuesday, June 6, 2017 9:17:40 AM
To: Mahdi Adnan
Cc: gluster-user; Gandalf Corvotempesta; Lindsay
2017 Jun 06
0
Rebalance + VM corruption - current status and request for feedback
Any additional tests would be great as a similiar bug was detected and
fixed some months ago and after that, this bug arose?.
Is still unclear to me why two very similiar bug was discovered in two
different times for the same operation
How this is possible?
If you fixed the first bug, why the second one wasn't triggered on your
test environment?
Il 6 giu 2017 10:35 AM, "Mahdi
2020 May 14
0
I can do alaw, ulaw and gsm; remote can do g729 and alaw; asterisk wants to translate g729 -> alaw. WHY?
On 14/05/2020 08:10, John Hughes wrote:
>
> I am having a problem with one of my callers who is using either g729
> or alaw. I can do alaw but not g729 so asterisk should negotiate alaw
> right? In fact from the sip debug it looks like it does, but then I
> get the dreaded "channel.c:5630 set_format: Unable to find a codec
> translation path: (g729) -> (alaw)"
2010 Jan 11
0
Fwd: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
Hi everyone,
Here's a follow-up on the two BoFs we've had about doing royalty-free
codecs at the IETF. Well, the good new is that the proposal is now in
IETF last call until January 20th (see below). No final decision has
been made, so it's important to get as much support as possible for the
Working Group proposal. You can see the ongoing discussion on the
mailing list archive:
2010 Jan 11
0
Fwd: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
Hi everyone,
Here's a follow-up on the two BoFs we've had about doing royalty-free
codecs at the IETF. Well, the good new is that the proposal is now in
IETF last call until January 20th (see below). No final decision has
been made, so it's important to get as much support as possible for the
Working Group proposal. You can see the ongoing discussion on the
mailing list archive:
2014 Oct 01
1
Dovecot fails to start - Unknown setting: socket
I?m receiving the following error(s) messages when trying reloading dovecot
(Debian wheezy).
doveconf: Fatal: Error in configuration file /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf line
73: Unknown setting: socket
doveconf: Error: managesieve-login: dump-capability process returned 89
Configuration file /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf :
# If you only want to use dovecot-auth, you can set this to "none".
2005 Jan 13
1
problems with astcc
hello *'s,
Astcc not workin what is correct format for defining
1-database
2-brands
3-trunks
4-routes
i define all these things but not workin may be i define in wrong
format.I have FXO card installed.can anyone implement it and also my
sip phone generates very loud noise wat is that i tried several
settings but not hear any voice just noise.
sip.conf
[general]
context=from-sip
port=5060
2014 Oct 14
1
debugging T.38 issues
Hello list,
We're currently facing some issues concerning T.38 gateway faxing.
This is a device used almost exclusively for receiving faxes. Calls
are incoming to asterisk on a SIP trunk (sangoma netborder) using
G711A. Gateway mode is activated in the asterisk dialplan towards a
Cisco SPA 112 running firmware 1.3.5. We are using asterisk 1.8.13.0
with the T.38 gateway patch applied (I know I
2017 Oct 09
1
Gluster 3.8.13 data corruption
OK.
Is this problem unique to templates for a particular guest OS type? Or is
this something you see for all guest OS?
Also, can you get the output of `getfattr -d -m . -e hex <path>` for the
following two "paths" from all of the bricks:
path to the file representing the vm created off this template wrt the
brick. It will usually be $BRICKPATH/xxxx....xx/images/$UUID where $UUID
2017 Jun 05
1
Rebalance + VM corruption - current status and request for feedback
Great, thanks!
Il 5 giu 2017 6:49 AM, "Krutika Dhananjay" <kdhananj at redhat.com> ha scritto:
> The fixes are already available in 3.10.2, 3.8.12 and 3.11.0
>
> -Krutika
>
> On Sun, Jun 4, 2017 at 5:30 PM, Gandalf Corvotempesta <
> gandalf.corvotempesta at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Great news.
>> Is this planned to be published in next
2020 May 14
0
I can do alaw, ulaw and gsm; remote can do g729 and alaw; asterisk wants to translate g729 -> alaw. WHY?
The other end is sending g729 even though it was not negotiated. The other
end should not do this and it usually seems that the other ends that do
send g729.
This was recently fixed. See
https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-28139
Richard
On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 1:11 AM John Hughes <john at calva.com> wrote:
> I am having a problem with one of my callers who is using
2017 Jun 05
0
Rebalance + VM corruption - current status and request for feedback
The fixes are already available in 3.10.2, 3.8.12 and 3.11.0
-Krutika
On Sun, Jun 4, 2017 at 5:30 PM, Gandalf Corvotempesta <
gandalf.corvotempesta at gmail.com> wrote:
> Great news.
> Is this planned to be published in next release?
>
> Il 29 mag 2017 3:27 PM, "Krutika Dhananjay" <kdhananj at redhat.com> ha
> scritto:
>
>> Thanks for that update.