similar to: CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 102, Issue 14

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 300 matches similar to: "CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 102, Issue 14"

2013 Aug 22
0
CESA-2013:X007 Moderate Xen4CentOS kernel Security Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2013:X007 (Xen4CentOS) The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) ----------------------------- X86_64 ----------------------------- 88c77ff2be214b47e3cb65b4e10c52e09d0e383c87b18f1f25314432df928e14 e1000e-2.4.14-3.4.59.1.el6.centos.alt.x86_64.rpm
2014 Feb 25
0
CESA-2014:X007 Moderate Xen4CentOS xen Security Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2014:X007 (Xen4CentOS) The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) ----------------------------- X86_64 ----------------------------- 15f776704e68192108e8e407a6e6d0286c2551a424c67784a8cc4a9169181079 xen-4.2.4-29.el6.centos.alt.x86_64.rpm
2014 Feb 26
0
CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 108, Issue 14
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When
2015 Aug 20
0
FW: ERR_DS_DRA_SCHEMA_MISMATCH after join samba 4.2.1 to existing domain
> > Hi > > > > > > I have multi domain environment with root domain and subdomain. > > Forest and domain level windows 2003 native. > > > Also forest prep and domain prep did for sccm 2007 ocs 2007 and > > Exchange 2003. > > > > > > After join Samba to domain like ad dc I had some problem with > > replication: > >
2015 May 12
1
FW: ERR_DS_DRA_SCHEMA_MISMATCH after join samba 4.2.1 to existing domain
Hi I have multi domain environment with root domain and subdomain. Forest and domain level windows 2003 native. Also forest prep and domain prep did for sccm 2007 ocs 2007 and Exchange 2003. After join Samba to domain like ad dc I had some problem with replication: ################################################# [root at dc03 ~]# samba-tool drs replicate dc02 dc03
2013 Aug 28
0
CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 102, Issue 15
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When
2013 Aug 27
0
CEBA-2013:X008 Xen4CentOS kernel Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2013:X008 (Xen4CentOS) The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) ----------------------------- X86_64 ----------------------------- 9ed8dcc6bf5dd3fdb3caf6380f1362079f3d3a109dc938db97c8a0b423798a5e kernel-firmware-3.4.59-9.el6.centos.alt.noarch.rpm ----------------------------- Source:
2001 Nov 06
2
ext3fs and 2.4.14 kernel
Good morning, I have tried to compile a 2.4.14 kernel (because I have some trouble with the framebuffer and my Toshiba...). Thus, I have downloaded the latest kernel and the ext3 patch. I have used the .config file used for the compilation of my 2.4.13 kernel, but the compilation ends with make[1]: Quitte le répertoire `/usr/src/linux-2.4.14/arch/i386/lib' ld -m elf_i386 -T
2001 Nov 07
1
Error compiling 2.4.14 with ext3 patch
Please CC me as I'm not subscribed. Attached is my kernel configuration. Please forgive me if this is being asked a gazillion times in the list. I'm using the 2.4.14 patch found at http://www.uow.edu.au/~andrewm/linux/ext3/ . ld -m elf_i386 -T /usr/src/linux-2.4.14/arch/i386/vmlinux.lds -e stext arch/i386/kernel/head.o arch/i386/kernel/init_task.o init/main.o init/version.o \
2013 Jul 27
0
CentOS Digest, Vol 102, Issue 26
? 2013-7-26 ??8:00? <centos-request at centos.org>??? > > Send CentOS mailing list submissions to > centos at centos.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > centos-request at centos.org > >
2001 Nov 05
2
oops on 2.4.14-pre8
Hello! I got oops after about 3 hours of uptime. Load was about 1,5. This is output of ksymoops after forced reboot if it helps someone. :-) ksymoops 2.4.0 on i686 2.4.14-pre8. Options used -V (default) -k /proc/ksyms (default) -l /proc/modules (default) -o /lib/modules/2.4.14-pre8/ (default) -m /boot/System.map-2.4.14-pre8 (default) Warning (compare_maps): mismatch on
2015 May 28
3
Re: Concurrent scanning of same disk
2015-05-27 15:21 GMT+03:00 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com>: > On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 09:38:38AM +0300, NoxDaFox wrote: > > * RuntimeError: file receive cancelled by daemon - On r = > > libguestfsmod.checksums_out (self._o, csumtype, directory, sumsfile) > > * RuntimeError: hivex_close: do_hivex_close: you must call 'hivex-open' > > first to
2002 Jul 11
1
(no subject)
Which version should I use out of the list? Or do I install all of them, one after the other? ext3-2.4-0.9.9-2410p4.gz 05Sep01 (Against 2.4.10-pre4) (Changelog) ext3-2.4-0.9.9-249ac9.gz 05Sep01 (Against 2.4.9-ac9) ext3-2.4-0.9.10-2410.gz 23Sep01 (Against 2.4.10) (Changelog) patch-rml-2.4.10-ac3-ext3-0.9.9-with-dir-speedup-1.gz 01Oct01 (From Robert Love. Unofficial :-))
2002 Jul 08
0
(no subject)
Which version should I use out of the list? Or do I install all of them, one after the other? ext3-2.4-0.9.9-2410p4.gz 05Sep01 (Against 2.4.10-pre4) (Changelog) ext3-2.4-0.9.9-249ac9.gz 05Sep01 (Against 2.4.9-ac9) ext3-2.4-0.9.10-2410.gz 23Sep01 (Against 2.4.10) (Changelog) patch-rml-2.4.10-ac3-ext3-0.9.9-with-dir-speedup-1.gz 01Oct01 (From Robert Love. Unofficial :-))
2013 Jul 22
0
CEEA-2013:X005 Xen4CentOS e1000e Update
CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2013:X005 (Xen4CentOS) The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) ----------------------------- X86_64 ----------------------------- e1000e-2.4.14-3.4.53.1.el6.centos.alt.x86_64.rpm: e135714af07c2cfccda09de474529be7a2d508ed0bc5fcd477efb9954d5fb07a ----------------------------- Source:
2013 Sep 11
0
CEBA-2013:X009 Xen4CentOS kernel Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2013:X009 (Xen4CentOS) The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) ----------------------------- X86_64 ----------------------------- 3c4339bbaad89af1a37fae19d251d64a275133ac5bbe55c2043a5a083c3a18ef e1000e-2.4.14-3.4.61.2.el6.centos.alt.x86_64.rpm
2001 Nov 07
3
Problem with 2.4.14 and 9.15-2414
I just upgraded to kernel 2.4.14 and applied the ext3 patch ext3-2.4-0.9.15-2414.gz. It appears (to me) that the patch breaks the loop block device module (loop.o). The problem is that the call to deactivate_page is unresolved. The routine used to be defined in swap.c. It looks like it no longer exists in 2.4.14. I'm not a kernel programmer so if I'm mistaken, sorry. I do get an
2001 Nov 14
1
unresolved symbols in loop
Hello, i have downloaded the kernel 2.4.14 and the correspondig ext3 patch ext3-2.4-0.9.15-2414.gz. After this i extract the archiv at /usr/src, renamed the dir linux to linux-2.4.14 and made a symlink linux-2.4. I changed to the directory linux-2.4 and add the patch as decsribed on the website gunzip < ~/ext3-2.4-0.9.15-2414.gz | patch -p1. There was no error and the patch was successful.
2013 Jul 23
0
CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 101, Issue 15
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When
2004 Jul 12
1
Performance difference with HTB patch in 2.4.14 and without patch in 2.4.20
Hi, I am using linux 2.4.14 box for my bandwidth management.I patched the kernel for HTB support.I think HTB comes by default with 2.4.20.My doubt is "Is there any performance difference between patched kernel i.e. 2.4.14 and unpatched kernel 2.4.20 with respect to bandwidth management ?" Thanks in advance, Aravind. Yahoo! India Careers: Over 50,000 jobsonline.