similar to: Metadata socket read error

In my blacklist I have: database show ... /blacklist/Manitoba : advertising ... [incoming] ; First, lets take care of telemarketers exten => 4,1,GotoIf(${BLACKLIST()}?blacklisted,s,1) exten => 4,n,Set(goaway=${CALLERID(number):0:2}) exten => 4,n,GotoIf($["${goaway}" = "V4" ]?blacklisted,s,1) exten => 4,n,GotoIf($["${goaway}" = "V3"

I have always been able to block toll-free numbers by catching them with a line similar to this for each DID I have on my system: exten => 5554441212/_888NXXXXXX,n,Playback(GoAway) Where 15554441212 is one of the DIDs that rings into our Asterisk box. The problem with this approach that I have to create a line like this for every pattern I want to block multiplied by every DID on my system,

I have a subroutine to block spammer by CALLERID(number) exten => 4,1,GotoIf(${BLACKLIST()}?blacklisted,s,1) exten => 4,n,Set(goaway=${CALLERID(number):0:2}) exten => 4,n,GotoIf($["${goaway}" = "V4" ]?blacklisted,s,1) exten => 4,n,GotoIf($["${goaway}" = "V3" ]?blacklisted,s,1) but I just got another spammer (automated calls) who rotates his

Hi, Thanks to John Wice for helping me with an earlier question. My two PCs behind the same router are still having problems connecting. Would appreciate thoughts on what I?m doing wrong? Router: Port 655 forwarded to 192.168.1.45, both TCP and UDP Port 656 forwarded to 192.168.1.51, both TCP and UDP Machine #1. ========== Local IP address on LAN = 192.168.1.45 Windows Firewall

Hi - Thanks to Sven-Haegar and Donald, but still having issues setting up with Windows. Machine1 can't ping the VPN address of machine2. Regular IPv4 address for both machines in 192.168.1.xxx range. Router: Forwarding port 655 to 101.102.103.1, UDP and TCP Forwarding port 656 to 101.102.103.2, UDP and TCP Tinc.conf on machine user1 just three lines: Name = vpnuser1 ConnectTo =

Hello Lars, Thanks for your feedback. Unfortunately I made an error in writing the network I expected to connect to. I meant 10.3.0.0/24 The one I wrote in fact was one network of the already established VPN. I have included full details of my relevant files below. Background: I am trying to set up a second VPN between two servers: gtdb and db2. Both servers are already part of separate

Hello, Early this year I got help here to setup tinc tunnels between users and a company LAN. Now I would like to try something different for a home usage and I have a question regarding security. The setup would look like as follows: - My home LAN has a classical topology where my ISP router is doing NAT and is blocking all incoming connection. I'm planning to enable port forwarding on the

On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 02:21:08AM -0500, md at rpzdesign.com wrote: > Oops, I got it to work only after putting the WAN on port 656 so it > did not interfere with port 655 for the LAN. You should not need to have two tinc daemons just because you have a WAN and a LAN interface. By default (ie, if you don't specify BindToAddress and/or BindToInterface), tinc listens on all interfaces,

Yes, I am sure but added another broader rule: nsasia at db1:~$ sudo ufw allow from any port 655 proto udp same result for debug example. regards Robert >>> Rafael Wolf <rfwolf at gmail.com> 13-Jun-18 5:32 PM >>> Telnet will only do tcp not udp which tinc works on. Are you sure udp 655 is open? On Wed, Jun 13, 2018, 3:51 AM Robert Horgan <robert

We run tinc in a linux environment in which it sits there waiting for connections from the clients. All clients are configured to only have one ConnectTo which points to this server. We're seeing in the server log that as soon as a client's connection is activated, a whole bunch of "Flushing x bytes to that host would block" is logged and the whole vpn is bogged down and has

Hi Lars, Appreciate all your help, unfortunately the problem remains. I've marked up below: >>> Lars Kruse <lists at sumpfralle.de> 22-May-19 4:02 PM >>> Hello Robert, Am Mon, 20 May 2019 11:11:39 +0700 schrieb "Robert Horgan" <Robert at gainplus.asia>: > These are my files: > > On server 1: db2 > > /etc/tinc/nets.boot > # >

Hello, I am having troubles with the following configuration in that it produces the following errors: *Masterserver:* On the server (yea, I know) side is a Linux machine called "*masterserver*". It should have a VPN IP of 192.168.2.1 and it sits behind a pretty generic ADSL Router (with port 655 forwarded) which can be found via a dynamic host address. A small snippet of errors this

Hi, Are you sure? What happens if you manually telnet/socket 10.130.39.180 nsasia at web3:~$ telnet 10.130.39.180 655 Trying 10.130.39.180... Connected to 10.130.39.180. Escape character is '^]'. 0 db1 17 Connection closed by foreign host. Stopping the service and running debug I get: nsasia at web3:~$ sudo tincd -n gainplus -d5 -D tincd 1.0.33 starting, debug level 5

Hi, I have successfully connected a network of about 60 nodes (many of which are virtual machines) with tinc 1.0 but encounter a severe bug when physical connectivity between two major locations is lost and then reconnected. From what I gathered, many nodes attempt to connect to many other nodes, causing 100% CPU load on all nodes, taking down the whole network with no node succeeding connecting

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Gus & Tinc-VPN List: It looks like I need to run 2 instances of tincd on each server. 1 instance of tincd will responsible for running a VPN over the LAN on eth1. This means Class C addresses from 10.0.1.10 -> 10.0.1.250 Another instance of tincd will be responsible for running a VPN over the WAN on eth0. This means Class C addresses from

Hello there, I was hoping that maybe one of you guys could help me out with a problem I'm experiencing with tinc1.0pre7. First, I'll start with my configuration, after that I'll explain my problem. Background ---------- This is a simple, client-server situation on a private network. Both machines run the same Debian Woody 3.0 testing installation and both have identical packages

Hello Guus, thank you very much for your suggestions, I could not dive into it further because I was traveling, but now I have time to reconfigure the network. At first I really like the idea of having 3 Daemons on the headquarter, one for each ISP. The firewall should forward the port 655 from each ISP's public IP Address to my internal server and to the ports 655, 656, 657 respectively,

Dear tincerers- Please help, I need to get this working *today* (ack!). I've installed tinc 1.0p3 on two machines fully updated rh7, "stockton" and "lodi", where "lodi" is trying to "ConnectTo" "stockton". When I start the tinc daemens on each side, this is what i get in my logs: Stockton: Feb 23 19:07:57 srouter tinc.pacheart[2794]: tincd

Dear tincerers- Please help, I need to get this working *today* (ack!). I've installed tinc 1.0p3 on two machines fully updated rh7, "stockton" and "lodi", where "lodi" is trying to "ConnectTo" "stockton". When I start the tinc daemens on each side, this is what i get in my logs: Stockton: Feb 23 19:07:57 srouter tinc.pacheart[2794]: tincd

Hi there, I'm trying to set tinc and I get the following messages: Sep 6 13:31:33 leibniz tinc.acvpn[12352]: tincd 1.0.1 (Aug 14 2003 15:09:44) starting, debug level 0 Sep 6 13:31:33 leibniz tinc.acvpn[12352]: /dev/net/tun is a Linux tun/tap device (tun mode) Sep 6 13:31:33 leibniz tinc.acvpn[12352]: Script tinc-up exited with non-zero status 126 Sep 6 13:31:33 leibniz tinc.acvpn[12352]: