similar to: [Bug 2138] New: SFTP interactive local rm

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2021 Bug #: 2021 Summary: sftp resume support (using size and offset) Classification: Unclassified Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: sftp

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1271 Summary: sftp should allow local files (lrm) and directories (lrmdir) to be removed Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 4.3p2 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: sftp

> > Message: 8 > Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 12:46:50 -0700 > From: Iain Morgan <imorgan at nas.nasa.gov> > To: Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> > Cc: "openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org" <openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org> > Subject: Re: Call for testing: OpenSSH-6.3 > Message-ID: <20130730194649.GC18047 at linux124.nas.nasa.gov> >

we have implemented this function for 3.1p1, and have been using it in production sense may 2002. The patch has been ported to 3.7.1p2, we have been using it in 3.7.1p2 for awhile, if anyone is interested, here it is. This is the same patch David Bradford talked about on 2002-06-05 Regards, Greg Hayes diff -u -r openssh-3.7.1p2/sftp-client.c openssh-3.7.1p2_sftp/sftp-client.c ---

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2021 --- Comment #3 from Loganaden Velvindron <loganaden at gmail.com> --- ping :-) ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug.

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2021 Loganaden Velvindron <loganaden at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #2199|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #12 from Loganaden Velvindron

Dear openssh developers, is there any plan to include the reget & reput commands into the sftp client? The sftp-server seems to already support the needed offset parameters. Frank

Hello openssh@ I thought about sftp's reget/reput commands. Several days ago, Damien Miller write to tech at openbsd.org (it was reply for my letter): > Herein lies a problem which is not easy to detect or solve. For > performance reasons, the sftp client does pipelined reads/writes when > transferring files. The protocol spec allows for a server to process > these requests out

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2275 Bug ID: 2275 Summary: sftp undocumented flags Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 6.6p1 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5 Component: sftp Assignee: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org Reporter:

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1921 Bug #: 1921 Summary: [Patch] memory leak in sftp-client.c Classification: Unclassified Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: trivial Priority: P2 Component: sftp AssignedTo:

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2021 Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #21 from Damien Miller <djm at

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2224 Bug ID: 2224 Summary: SFTP upload resume Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: sftp Assignee: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=626 Colin Watson <cjwatson at debian.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cjwatson at debian.org --- Comment #3 from Colin Watson <cjwatson at debian.org> --- Isn't this fixed in

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2021 --- Comment #10 from Loganaden Velvindron <loganaden at gmail.com> --- ping :-) ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug.

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1956 Bug #: 1956 Summary: sftp segfaults in parse_args() when argv[0] is NULL Classification: Unclassified Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: sftp

Ben Lindstrom wrote (a very long time ago) : >The problem is in some cases the data being sent to you may be out of >order (thankful no sftp server does this yet). So reget/reput without RFC >clearifications can lead to bad file transfers. > >I'm trying to drag up in my mind which one was the problem... I believe >reput is fine since the client has control over the

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2171 Bug ID: 2171 Summary: potential fd leak Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Hardware: Other OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: sftp Assignee: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org

Hi, I work on openssh-2.9p2 installed on LynxOS i386 system. sshd, ssh, scp and sftp-server all work fine. The problem is sftp client, in interactive mode, exits after authentication printing the sftp prompt. sftp client works fine in non-interactive mode. i.e., lynxos>sftp hari at linuxsystem:test works fine But, lynxos>sftp hari at linuxsystem ... sftp> lynxos> Any help, as to why

Dear all, this might be not only an R-question but also a statistical. When I do a logistic regression analysis (species distribution modeling) with function lrm (Design package) I get the follwoing error message: > tadl1<-lrm(triad~fd+dista+fd2+dista2+fd:dista+dista:geo2, x=T, y=T) Error in if (!length(fname) || !any(fname == zname)) { : missing value where TRUE/FALSE needed The

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1624 Summary: [sftp] add recursive option -r to command rm Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.1p1 Platform: ix86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: sftp AssignedTo: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org