similar to: [Bug 10051] New: Improved long file-name handling

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10575 Summary: Long Delay for Large Folders Even with Incremental File-List Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12570 Bug ID: 12570 Summary: Problems with --checksum --existing Product: rsync Version: 3.1.1 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core Assignee: wayned at samba.org Reporter: atom at

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10379 Summary: rsync metadata files Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: me at haravikk.com QAContact:

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14371 Bug ID: 14371 Summary: Combined Exclude & Protect Filter Type Product: rsync Version: 3.2.0 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: core Assignee: wayne at opencoder.net

> On 27 Jan 2016, at 21:55, Axel Luttgens <axel.luttgens at skynet.be> wrote: > > Hello Haravikk, > > Perhaps could you try to devise an exception based on one (or more) "remote" section(s), as in: > > remote ip.of.webmail.server { > ssl_verify_client_cert = no > [other settings, if needed] > } > > But I guess you would need to combine

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10579 Summary: --xattr internal abbrev error Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: Mac OS X Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: samba at haravikk.com

On 02 Feb 2016, at 13:09, Haravikk <dovecot at haravikk.me> wrote: > > So I still haven?t found a way to require client certificates only for port 993/IMAPS while leaving unencrypted IMAP open for local, trusted, services. > > Is there really no way to do this? I just found out how to do the same thing for postfix (turns out it?s fairly easy, just a matter of adding the

Okay, I'd like to start first by saying, awesome work on this project! It's been a few years since I last tracked the progress of WINE on OS X, and it's come on leaps and bounds as I can run most everything I've thrown at it so far, with only minor issues here and there, which is a damned sight better than VMWare Fusion or Parallels which have compatibility issues everywhere,

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9864 Summary: Allow permanent compression of destination files Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: me at haravikk.com

I?m using dovecot to provide encrypted IMAP e-mail support for remote clients and it?s working great. However, I also need to set up a webmail front-end (Roundcube), which I?m hoping to have use unencrypted IMAP on port 143 (as only port 993 is available externally). The problem I?m running into is that I want to require client certificate authentication on port 993, but dovecot is apparently

So I?m looking at setting up some house-keeping for my dovecot mailboxes, specifically deleting messages in trash, spam etc., by deleting Seen messages older than X days. In order to protect against the edge case of a user reading a message right before the deletion task however I?d like to do something like the following: doveadm expunge -A OLD SEEN BEFORE 7d MAILBOX Trash doveadm flags -A

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10507 Summary: Structured Output (for Simpler Parsing) Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: me at haravikk.com

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10601 Summary: Retry Delay for Vanished Files/Directories Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: samba at haravikk.com

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10380 Summary: Non-Nested Folder Optimisation Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: me at haravikk.com

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9814 Summary: --cache parameter for storing recent file data Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: me at haravikk.com

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9812 Summary: Lookahead file-list loading and comparison Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: me at haravikk.com

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14081 Bug ID: 14081 Summary: --copy-command option for specifying custom file copying behaviour Product: rsync Version: 3.1.3 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: core

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7951 Summary: Option for case insensitivity in filter rules Product: rsync Version: 3.0.6 Platform: All URL: http://lists.samba.org/archive/rsync/2007- March/017381.html OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3

I have some users where I'd like to expunge their mail at different times. For example, I may have some users who I want to expunge everything from every folder at 30 days. Others where I'd like to expunge everything at 90 days. And still others where I only want to expunge mail from the Trash and Junk folders, and nowhere else. Is there a way to do some sort of lookup for this? Or

Bah! Okay, so I'm running WINE v1.1.43 on Mac OS X.6.3. Now, I went and bought myself a copy of Oblivion (Game of the Year Edition), but it's got smelly SecuROM in it, which I understand WINE supports? However, whenever I try to run one of the "protected" (from customers) programs it complains that there is no disk. The disk however is there alright, and I have a mapping for