similar to: R Package License

Hi All, I installed qcc package and the dependency packages. For the first time I can use the function : process.capability.sixpack(). But later when ran the code again I always got the following error: Error: could not find function "process.capability.sixpack". I tried reinstalling the qcc package but didn't help. Does anyone have this kind of experience? Thank you! Regards, Yan

hello guys, i am a petroleum engineering student and i will be having a long semester break and currently i am learning THE R PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE just out of interest. I would just like to know if i am able to design a business analysis software using R as in create a type of software that can be sold to business people. can this be done in R language? another thing is if i do learn this all

Thank you very much this really helped me a lot . So actually why would people learn R(other than personal interests ) if you can't really build anything that can be sold ? I'm sorry if I'm asking bad questions > On 12 Jan 2018, at 4:43 AM, Marc Schwartz <marc_schwartz at me.com> wrote: > > > >> On Jan 11, 2018, at 2:15 PM, muhammad ramzi <mramzi43 at

Dear All, thanks a lot for all the quick and helpful responses! I'm currently interested in the "stance" of this community towards closed source contributions. The way I understand it, currently my options are quite limited: I would most likely need to use a remote procedure call API, and build one side of the API as GPL. But this would make the coupling much slower and more

Because many technical people need to accomplish statistical data analysis with computers that depend on existing algorithms applied in new ways, or with new algorithms that are not implemented by commercial software. Often such people have no desire to provide step-by-step support of their tools for every user of their code indefinitely, so developing commercial software for others is less

> On Jan 11, 2018, at 2:15 PM, muhammad ramzi <mramzi43 at gmail.com> wrote: > > hello guys, > > i am a petroleum engineering student and i will be having a long semester > break and currently i am learning THE R PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE just out of > interest. I would just like to know if i am able to design a business > analysis software using R as in create a type of

Hello, I plan to create a commercial software that would automate the running of a few IT security tools and build a nice report, in order to help security auditors in their work. I saw your smbclient tool that could be really appropriate. As this tool is GPL'd, I would like to make sure you agree with the usage (running and parsing) I plan. Of course, should you have any requirement (e.g.

Hi, I use R at home, and am interested in using it at my work company (which is in the Fortune 100). I began the request, and our legal team has given some gruff about the open source license. Not boring you with the details here, but I used some info on gnu.org as a rebuttal, and someone at the company replied that the generalities of GNU GPL may differ from R's specific GNU GPL license,

Dear All, I've been following this mailing list for over three years now, but its just now that I have realized that R is licensed under GPL! :-) I'm not a lawyer and I don't want lawyer advice, but I'd like to get your feedback on a license question. My goal is to develop commercial software for image analysis of biomedical samples that may be used i.e. in academic institutions.

Hi there Is there a commercial license for using Rsync or the Rsync algorithm within a commercial product? I appreciate that Rsync as it stands is GNU and therefore it cannot be used in this way, but I thought that I would ask the list. I understand that it is open source, but we have an application that would benefit from something like Rsync and therefore thought we would ask the question. If

My humble 2 nonlegal cents: There are multiple packages that make the link between R and proprietary software. One example is R2WinBUGS which connects to WinBUGS, but there are a lot more of these. All of these use essentially the same idea: - create the package under a standard GPL license - use the (command line) interface provided by the proprietary software to connect with it, eg by calls to

A few days ago, I sent a question to the r-help list enquiring about the *** LEGALITY *** of porting a function from Splus into R. As a particular example, I referred to error.bar. Several people posted code for various versions of error.bar which they had written, but that was NOT WHAT I WAS ASKING FOR/ABOUT!!! [Can't anybody ***read*** these days?] I asked: IS IT

Dear Samba team, We have developed cross-platform multiprotocol intranet file searcher and it includes the module (SMB scanner for *nix) which uses libsmbclient to enumerate all files on smb shares ("uses" means including headers and linking with library). Other modules also use some external libraries, but all other libraries have LGPL license. We prefer to publish our

Hi, I would send an introductory e-mail to: R-foundation at R-project.org <mailto:R-foundation at R-project.org> That will facilitate further discussion on the matter and additional details can be requested offline as may be needed. Be aware that none of the R Foundation members are lawyers. So while we can perhaps offer informal and non-binding opinions, you should seek formal legal

Dear all, This is a little bit off-topic, but I was wondering if anyone has any informed opinion on whether data (ie. a dataset) is copyrightable? Hadley

ACM Software Copyright and License Agreement I have often seen the use of routines from the ACM Collected Algorithms, i.e. <netlib.org/toms/> (CALGO, or Trans. On Math. Software, TOMS), in Open Source programs, maybe also in some R packages --- and sometimes these programs are distributed under the GPL license, sometimes under proprietary licenses, e.g. in Scilab. The use of these CALGO

Hi, The Perl module Search::Xapian's README file ends with these lines: ===================================================================== This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the same terms as Perl itself. ===================================================================== (http://cpansearch.perl.org/src/OLLY/Search-Xapian-1.2.4.0/README) But

On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 9:13 AM, David Chisnall <David.Chisnall at cl.cam.ac.uk> wrote: > On 3 Nov 2016, at 15:55, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> wrote: > > > >> I and the other libc++ contributors were all happy to have our code > relicensed under the MIT license (or contribute it under those terms > originally), so there is some pretty clear evidence

On May 13, 2008, at 10:04 PM, Razvan Aciu wrote: > Thanks for your replies. This is indeed a helpful mailing list. I > made some > more researches about the licensing issue and this is what I > discovered: > For now, I think for a commercial developer who wants to create a > complete > compiler toolchain using llvm, trying to package its compiler with > GCC is a

At 03:28 30/04/97, ihaka at stat.auckland.ac.nz wrote: >Bill Venables writes: > (As a complete side-issue, Brian Ripley and I have a kind of > convention: we refer to the language as "S" and the commercial > product as "S-PLUS". There is a useful distinction to be made.) > >This is generally what I try to do too. > >However, I suspect though that most