Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "fitting the null loglinear model with MASS::loglm??"
2013 Jul 09
0
probable bugs in stats::loglin calculation of pearson chisq
In running the following example of a loglinear model for the Titanic data,
I was surprised to see NaN reported for the
Pearson chisq
> loglin(Titanic, margin=list(1:3, 4))
2 iterations: deviation 2.273737e-13
$lrt
[1] 671.9622
$pearson
[1] NaN
$df
[1] 15
$margin
$margin[[1]]
[1] "Class" "Sex" "Age"
$margin[[2]]
[1] "Survived"
Tracing it back,
2010 Mar 01
0
MASS::loglm - exploring a collection of models with add1, drop1
I'd like to fit and explore a collection of hierarchical loglinear
models that might
range from the independence model,
~ 1 + 2 + 3 + 4
to the saturated model,
~ 1 * 2 * 3 * 4
I can use add1 starting with a baseline model or drop1 starting with the
saturated model,
but I can't see how to get the model formulas or terms in each model as
a *list* that I can work with
further.
Consider
2010 Nov 08
1
unknown dimensions for loglm
Dear R-help community,
I am working with multidimensional contingency tables and I am having
trouble getting loglm to run on all dimensions without typing out each
dimension.
I have generated random data and provided output for the results I want
below:
d1.c1 <- rnorm(20, .10, .02)
d1.c2 <- rnorm(20, .10, .02)
d2.c1 <- rnorm(20, .09, .02)
d2.c2 <- rnorm(20, .09, .02)
d3.c1 <-
2010 Apr 14
1
Sig differences in Loglinear Models for Three-Way Tables
Hi all,
I've been running loglinear models for three-way tables: one of the
variables having three levels, and the other two having two levels each.
An example looks like below:
> yes.no <- c("Yes","No")
> switch <- c("On","Off")
> att <- c("BB","AA","CC")
> L <- gl(2,1,12,yes.no)
> T <-
2015 Oct 22
0
C_LogLin (stats/loglin)
Kai,
Apologies for the double message, it didn't go to the list last time.
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 9:59 AM, Kai Nitschke <
kai.nitschke at uniklinik-freiburg.de> wrote:
>
> ?.Call? calls the C/C++ function ?C_LogLin?. But when I am running it line
> by line I get
> the following error on line 23/24:
> Error: object 'C_LogLin' not found
>
> Hence, my
1999 Feb 18
1
[R] possible bug in loglm (PR#122)
Bug report: there is a problem with loglm (or some underlying code)
when used with updating within a function. For example, this code
works as expected, when used outside a function:
-------------------------------------------------
library(MASS)
2015 Oct 22
2
C_LogLin (stats/loglin)
Hi everyone,
I have a question regarding a C function of the "stats" package in R.
I tried to understand the ?loglin? basic function of the ?stats?
package implemented in
R. The implemented function itself runs without any problem (perhaps
see sample). When I
ran it line by line it stopped at the lines 23-24 of the
loglin-function; (the following line):
z <- .Call(C_LogLin,
1999 May 23
0
Bug in loglin with variable called "c" (PR#198)
Summary:
loglin will fail if there is a global variable called c. I have
fixed this for 0.64.2 and 0.65.
On Sat, 22 May 1999, Cor en Aylin wrote:
> Dear Brian,
>
> Using the mass library for R (the most recent port dated 16 may 1999) I
Could you give version numbers in such reports please: at the moment there
is an official version (5.3pl037) of MASS for R, plus a pre-release of MASS
2002 Oct 23
2
loglinear models
I am using the loglin function of the base package to fit log-linear models.
I am interested in obtaining the parameter values and their standard errors.
Parameters are easily obtained, but I haven't found the way of obtaining
their standad errors. Is this possible with the loglin function? If not, is
there any other function to get them?
Many thanks,
--
Vicente Piorno
Departamento de Ecolox?a
2000 Jul 25
1
glm and capture-recapture
Hello,
I am almost new in R, so perhaps my question will be silly.
I try to use R for analyzing capture-recapture data in epidemiology. A cancer registry has different sources of patients. We know in each list, patients already known in all other list. The aim is to use capture-recapture models for estimating the number of patients unknow of all the sources.
Because no order in sources, one
1999 Apr 14
2
No LOGLM coefficients
Dear R-helpers,
Im trying to fit a Log-linear model on a dataset with bird counts from
60 sites over 14 years for 12 months each (factors for the models). One
of the aims is to predict the missing values in this dataset with model
predictions.
Ive first tried to work with GLM's, that worked fine except for models
with one or more interaction-terms. The GLMs run, run .. for hours. So I
2004 Jan 29
2
Loglienar models
Hello,
I'm planning to start using R. Before getting into it, I'd like to
ask a couple of questions. Does R carry out loglinear model analysis?
That is, will it provide the chi-squared goodness of fit test statistic
for a given hierarchical loglinear model? Maybe even do a model
selection procedure (like Brown's two-step procedure, or
forward/backward selection)? Thanks
2009 Jan 14
1
loglm fitting
Dear all,
sorry to bother you all with this but I've been trying to use the loglm in
MASS package (v2.8.0) and cannot get any sensible output.
I'm wondering am I doing something very foolish or missing something
obvious.
For example, I tried the documentation help(loglm) example - here's the
code
# Case 1: frequencies specified as an array.
sapply(minn38,
2003 Oct 30
0
loglm() uses only a reference to data, and not data itsel f - is that on purpose??
loglm() is a port of an original written for S-PLUS. The fact that it
carries only a reference to the data frame is neither intentional nor
unintentional, but an unnoticed side-effect. I can see advantages both
ways. (I'm not so sure, either, that what you say is standard behaviour for
model fitting functions really is so universal.)
It would not be too hard to come up with a version that
2009 Oct 20
1
2x2 Contingency table with much sampling zeroes
Hi,
I'm analyzing experimental results where two different events ("T1"
and "T2") can occur or not during an experiment. I made my experiments
with one factor ("Substrate") with two levels ("Sand" and "Clay").
I would like to know wether or not "Substrate" affects the occurrence
probability of the two events. Moreover, for each
2012 Jun 08
1
Fwd: How to best analyze dataset with zero-inflated loglinear dependent variable?
Dear netters,
Sorry for cross-posting this question. I am sure R-Help is not a
research methods discussion list, but we have many statisticians in
the list and I would like to hear from them. Any function/package in R
would be able to deal with the problem from this researcher?
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Heidi Bertels
Date: Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 4:31 PM
Subject: How to best
2007 May 23
0
Replicated LR goodness-of-fit tests, heterogeneity G, with loglm?
I have numerous replicated goodness-of-fit experiments (observed compared to expected counts in categories) and these
replicates are nested within a factor.
The expected counts in each cell are external (from a
scientific model being tested). The
calculations I need within each level of the nesting factor are a heterogeneity
G test, with the total G and the pooled G across replicates. Then I
2009 Feb 18
2
indicator or deviation contrasts in log-linear modelling
I am fairly new to log-linear modelling, so as opposed to trying to fit
modells, I am still trying to figure out how it actually works - hence I am
looking at the interpretation of parameters. Now it seems most people skip
this part and go directly to measuring model fit, so I am finding very few
references to actual parameters, and am of course clear on the fact that
their choice is irelevant for
2010 Apr 15
0
[R-pkgs] vcdExtra 0.5-0 is released to CRAN
I'm pleased to announce the release of the vcdExtra package, v. 0.5-0
from R-Forge to CRAN, on its way to a CRAN server near you.
vcdExtra was originally designed to serve as a sandbox for introducing
extensions of mosaic plots and other visualizations for categorical
data, particularly those that apply to (poisson surrogate)
loglinear models fitted using glm() and
related, generalized
2002 Jan 30
1
mosaicplot(formula, data)--- bugged?
I have been tinkering with mosaicplot() and friends as a way
of learning R. As part of this, I've written a pair.table()
method for mosaic matrices, and would like to extend mosaicplot
to work with loglin and logln (MASS) objects. I'm using
R 1.4.0 on Win 98.
I've been trying to figure out the formula interface, and think
there's a bug, but not sure how to find it, yet alone fix