similar to: Migration from 3.5.6-27 to 3.6.16-31

Hi All, I have joined a samba4 instance to en existing W2k8 AD domain as an additional domain controller. When I do samba-tool dbcheck I get (example) : ERROR: wrong instanceType 4 on CN=INVIEW-DC2,OU=Domain Controllers,DC=inview,DC=local, should be 0 Not changing instanceType from 4 to 0 on CN=INVIEW-DC2,OU=Domain Controllers,DC=inview,DC=local This happens for 644 out of 655 of the

Hello, I configured some shares with the option "browseable = No" but this share still browseable. my smb.conf: [global] workgroup = CENA-C realm = cena-c.pt netbios name = SAMBA server role = active directory domain controller template shell = /bin/bash server services = rpc, nbt, wrepl, ldap, cldap, kdc, drepl, winbind, ntp_signd, kcc,

============================================================== "All water has a perfect memory and is forever trying to get back to where it was." Toni Morrison ============================================================== Release Announcements ===================== This is is the latest stable release of Samba 3.6. Major enhancements in Samba 3.6.16 include: o Fix

============================================================== "All water has a perfect memory and is forever trying to get back to where it was." Toni Morrison ============================================================== Release Announcements ===================== This is is the latest stable release of Samba 3.6. Major enhancements in Samba 3.6.16 include: o Fix

Hi, My system: OS: Centos 6.4? Samba: 3.6.16 I'm trying to build the RPMS from the packaging/RHEL directory.? After I patched the samba.spec file the build is successful.? All packages install without an issue. But when I try to install the SSSD, its dependencies get errors that it conflicts with libtalloc, libtdb and libtevent. from the samba-common. If I try to use the external

============================================================== "All water has a perfect memory and is forever trying to get back to where it was." Toni Morrison ============================================================== Release Announcements ===================== This is is the latest stable release of Samba 3.6. Major enhancements in Samba 3.6.16 include: o Fix

Hi, For reasons I'll explain below for those interested, I need to downgrade Samba from 3.6.16 to 3.0.36. Are there changes to the TDB files that will cause problems when I do this? And if there are, is there a relatively easy way to fix it? Thanks, Rob Boring description of why I need to do this: I support a product that is based on Linux and includes Samba to provide CIFS support. The

On Thu, 29 Dec 2016 18:15:33 +0100 Marc Muehlfeld <mmuehlfeld at samba.org> wrote: > Am 29.12.2016 um 17:34 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > > I mis-read that, I thought he had removed the old NT4-style PDC, > > but if he now has (as Marc thinks) no Samba DCs and is only using > > windows DCs, I fail to see how this can be a Samba problem or how > > it can be

CentOS-5.7 SQLite-3.6.6 Ruby on Rails 3.1 Ruby-1.8.7 I have a situation wherein the version of SQLite-3 on CentOS-5 is too 'old' for the Ruby language sqlite3 DBMS adapter to successfully build against. I managed to obtain an rpm for ruby-1.8.7 but I cannot find one for sqlite-3.6.16 or later. Does anyone here have a lead on where such a beast, including the sqlite development headers,

Shouldn't it use one or the other? In file included from ./../nsswitch/winbind_nss_config.h:46:0, from ../nsswitch/libwbclient/libwbclient.h:31, from ../nsswitch/libwbclient/wbc_guid.c:26: ./../lib/replace/system/network.h:134:8: error: redefinition of ?struct ifaddrs? struct ifaddrs { ^ In file included from ./../lib/replace/system/network.h:130:0, from ./../nsswitch/winbind_nss_config.h:46,

Hi. Samba-4.0.7 FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT Besides serving files I'm using Samba to authenticate users in the Windows AD with squid. After having issues with samba 3.6.16 I decided to see if samba4 will fit me more. I was surprised, but I found that Samba 4 is fully functional in my environment and is nearly production-ready. After that I tried to setup squid to use samba for NTLM authentication.

Hello all. I'm trying to configure pam_smbpass for Samba 3.6.16 on Solaris 10. However, I'm getting a strange result: instead of sync'ing the password, it *removes* it. That is not quite what I expect... I have this line in /etc/pam.conf: other password required pam_smbpass_csw.so debug use_authtok try_first_pass nonull To start the test, I make sure passwords are already

Hi all! Im using samba 3.0.23c from debian backports and I finding some problems, this host has worked flawlessly since a a few months ago. But now stopped to work properly. My versions are: ii winbind 3.0.23c-1~bpo.1 service to resolve user and group information from Windows N ii samba 3.0.23c-1~bpo.1 a LanManager-like file and printer server for

Greetings. I've been asked to configure Samba on an hP server to replace LAN Manager since LAN Manager goes away in 10.20. Ok, I've got Samba built and running. Any Win95 clients can see the server with Network Neigh, net view etc. (This is HP-UX 9.xx) We also have a _bunch_ of HP Windows Clients. These boot quite happily via tftp with both LANM and samba running. These HP clients

Hi everyone. We have recently come across an interesting issue after upgrading from 3.6.16 to 3.6.22. Since we can't currently upgrade to 4.x and we have Win7 machines on site, we implemented a 3rd party product called "Nitrobit Group Policy" which has been working very well since last Summer. On startup, before the login prompt it connects to a share to read in the machine

I have a client that recently upgraded from Win XP to Win 7. They were seeing odd slowdowns and poor performance, so we upgraded to Samba 3.5.6 and enabled win 7 support "max protocol = SMB2". They contacted me this morning with a report of more strange behavior, names the inability to access newly created folders with the message "file is too large for file system". There

Hello, I use Debian Squeeze with Samba 3.5.6. I do experience problems that might be related to those described in bug 7892 that can be found found here: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7892 I could not find any information about this bug being fixed in Samba 3.5.x. In the realease notes of Samba 3.4.10 I found this: '* BUG 7892: Fix stale lock in open_file_fchmod().' As

Hi all, We're testing 3.5.6 as an upgrade to our old 3.0.x instance. Our XP boxes can see our Samba 3.5.6 shares fine. Our Win7 boxes cannot. "The specified network name is no longer available." Relevant config portion is as follows: log level = 20 workgroup = OURCOMP security = ads encrypt passwords = yes realm = OURCOMP.ORG password server =

Guys, I have probably missed an announcement or overlooked something in a changelog, but I just want to confirm what I'm seeing is expected behavior. I run samba in standalone mode and I have always checked operation with smbclient -U% -Llocalhost Now the faithful command returns an error: Connection to localhost failed (Error NT_STATUS_BAD_NETWORK_NAME) Simply using the hostname

Hi. I'm using samba to authenticate squid users in Windows AD, and to provide 'em some statistics on the Internet usage. As this requires the existence of windows users in Unix environment, I use nsswitch.conf and nss_winbind.so to map users in Unix environment via samba as domain member (security = ads) and its winbindd daemon. As of samba 3.5.6 I'm expiriencing some major