similar to: Quota based on LDAP group

Hi Pavel On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 9:40 PM, Pavel Roskin <proski at gnu.org> wrote: > Quoting David Herrmann <dh.herrmann at gmail.com>: > >> I am aware of this and there is already a fix pending from 2 weeks >> ago. Unfortunately, I have been in the US for the last 2 weeks and >> haven't really been able to push on that. Anyhow, it should really be >>

Hi Pavel On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 11:46 PM, Pavel Roskin <proski at gnu.org> wrote: > On Wed, 2 Oct 2013 16:47:29 +0200 > David Herrmann <dh.herrmann at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Thanks for your investigations. I finally sent my patch and put you on >> CC. Sorry for the delay, but I have mostly catched up with all emails >> now. >> >> This really just

hi there! i'm trying to run dovecot 1.2.4 managesieve service with mysql auth. authentication is obviously going fine, i have debug_auth set to on and can see log lines indicating auth success: 2009-11-18 16:04:24 auth(default): Info: client in: AUTH 1 PLAIN service=pop3 secured lip=127.0.0.1 rip=127.0.0.1 lport=10100 rport=42497 resp=<hidden>

Hi Pavel On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 12:10 AM, Pavel Roskin <proski at gnu.org> wrote: > Hi David, > > On Thu, 3 Oct 2013 00:19:56 +0200 > David Herrmann <dh.herrmann at gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> And your PCI-BAR adjustment doesn't change >> >> anything either, sorry. >> > >> > I simply tried another approach to pacify the

Hello, This problem is regarding the configuration directive called 'LoginGraceTime'. Problem Description: Tests were done with OpenSSH -3.6.1p2 and 3.7.1p2 on HP-UX. sshd is started with LoginGraceTime as 1 minute.Three windows were used to initiate the ssh client.After launching two clients wait for a sometime without issuing the password so it exceeds the grace period for login.when

Hi out there, I think i've everything set up properly, outbound calls are working fine, but at incoming calls I can't hear anything, but the other one is able to hear me perfectly. I'm using an asterisk 1.6.1.10 in my internal network in a NAT, connected to my sip-provider using a trunk. Firewall settings on the router are: forward UDP port 5060,5004,10000-20000 to asterisk server

I'm sure there is a rationale for binding the ssh client to a priviledged port. (Which?) However there are several drawbacks to this: o It breaks firewall rules that assume that user connections start at port > 1024 or > 32768. o It breaks monitoring software using the same assumptions. o Every suid program is a separate evil (caused by the flawed security model in most unices). I

Hello, I have been using flags in public folders for quite a while with no problems. Once the flags were added to all clients (Thunderbird), they were visible and synchronized properly. Now I have added some new flags, and in the dovecot-keywords files I see that I am now using more than 25 flags (in which case they are not stored using an additional letter in the filename). Now I see that

From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com> Currently drm_gem_handle_create_tail exposes the handle to userspace before the buffer object constructions is complete. This allowing of working against a partially constructed object, which may also be in the process of having its creation fail, can have a range of negative outcomes. A lot of those will depend on what the individual

From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com> Currently drm_gem_handle_create_tail exposes the handle to userspace before the buffer object constructions is complete. This allowing of working against a partially constructed object, which may also be in the process of having its creation fail, can have a range of negative outcomes. A lot of those will depend on what the individual

Hi all I am trying to set up an email Server with a Samba4 AD as user Directory. Does anybody know a good how-to to setup user auth against AD ? Or could anyone tell me how to do it? I am having an email Server up and running with openldap but want to change to Samba4 AD, because of the openchange Integration. I would appreciate any help on this topic. -- Mit freundlichem Gru? Carsten

Hi, On 14/02/2023 13:59, Christian K?nig wrote: > Am 14.02.23 um 13:50 schrieb Tvrtko Ursulin: >> From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com> >> >> Currently drm_gem_handle_create_tail exposes the handle to userspace >> before the buffer object constructions is complete. This allowing >> of working against a partially constructed object, which may

Hi, On 14/02/2023 13:59, Christian K?nig wrote: > Am 14.02.23 um 13:50 schrieb Tvrtko Ursulin: >> From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com> >> >> Currently drm_gem_handle_create_tail exposes the handle to userspace >> before the buffer object constructions is complete. This allowing >> of working against a partially constructed object, which may

Hi On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 5:37 PM, Pavel Roskin <proski at gnu.org> wrote: > On Fri, 27 Sep 2013 10:33:26 +0100 > Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov at gmail.com> wrote: > >> FWIW another nvc0 user is experiencing the same/similar issue and the >> patch seems to resolve the problem in his case. >> >> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69488 >

hi there, I have a LDAP dir with an attribute set to 0 or 1 and in my old setup (a courier server) I used this attribute to map it to an authoption called disableimap. This prevent users to access the mailbox with imap protocol. So the question is what should I set in dovecot to get the same behaviour? I looked at the docs but the part with the pass_ilter and service doesn't really

Hi there, I have a need to have scp pass the -P option to ssh to "bypass" the packetfilters that doesn't allow connections to return to arbitary "priviledged" ports, ie. ports <1024. See attached context sensitive diffs against 2.2.0p1 to please integrate. Thanx Hendrik Visage -------------- next part -------------- *** 1.1 2000/10/11 13:31:45 --- scp.c 2000/10/11

On 20/02/2023 10:01, Christian K?nig wrote: > Am 20.02.23 um 10:55 schrieb Tvrtko Ursulin: >> >> Hi, >> >> On 14/02/2023 13:59, Christian K?nig wrote: >>> Am 14.02.23 um 13:50 schrieb Tvrtko Ursulin: >>>> From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com> >>>> >>>> Currently drm_gem_handle_create_tail exposes the handle

On 20/02/2023 10:01, Christian K?nig wrote: > Am 20.02.23 um 10:55 schrieb Tvrtko Ursulin: >> >> Hi, >> >> On 14/02/2023 13:59, Christian K?nig wrote: >>> Am 14.02.23 um 13:50 schrieb Tvrtko Ursulin: >>>> From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com> >>>> >>>> Currently drm_gem_handle_create_tail exposes the handle

CentOS-6 When I login as root I see this prompt: [root at vhost04 ~]# When I login as a non-priviledged user I see this instead: sh-4.1$ .bashrc and .bash_profile have identical contents in /root and /home/user. What causes the difference? Why? How does one change the default so that all normal users get a [userid at hostname pwd]$ prompt? I have loked in/etc/profile.d and /etc/bashrc

On Thursday 09 June 2011 01:10:09 Randy Dunlap wrote: > On Wed, 8 Jun 2011 17:45:54 -0500 Timur Tabi wrote: > > > Add the drivers/virt directory, which houses drivers that support > > virtualization environments, and add the Freescale hypervisor management > > driver. > > It can't go in linux/virt or linux/virt/fsl instead? why drivers/ ? > > or maybe