similar to: Help needed in feature extraction from two input files

Displaying 19 results from an estimated 19 matches similar to: "Help needed in feature extraction from two input files"

2009 Jan 07
2
Plotting a graph for every Level of a Factor
Hello, I'm sorry if this seems similar to my last post but I thought it was significantly different to warrent a new thread. Using the dataset below, is there a way to generate a bar/line plot for the TACC/Catch of every lvl of stock? i.e. OR1,OR3,OR5. The picture at the bottom of this post is an example of the bar/line plot for OR1 which was generated when OR1 was the only stock in the
2010 Sep 08
3
[LLVMdev] Complex regalloc contraints
Hi Carlos, Jakob, The PBQP allocator was designed to support a very wide range of constraints, and can handle something like this easily. Say you have 4 of these orX/irX registers, then for any pair of virtual registers used in such an add instruction you would add the following constraint matrix to the PBQP instance: [ 0 inf inf inf ] [ inf 0 inf inf ] [ inf inf 0 inf ] [ inf inf inf 0
2010 Sep 07
0
[LLVMdev] Complex regalloc contraints
On Sep 7, 2010, at 3:01 AM, Carlos Sanchez de La Lama wrote: > The machine I am targeting has some special requirements for some > operations, say: > > ADD or1, ir1, r5 > > would add ir1 (input reg 1) and r5 and put the result in or1 (output reg > 1). The point id that input and output regs have to go paired (this > meaning an addition of ir1 with whatever always goes to
2010 Jan 27
1
Possible bug in fisher.test() (PR#14196)
# is there a bug in the calculation of the odds ratio in fisher.test? # Nicholas Horton, nhorton at smith.edu Fri Jan 22 08:29:07 EST 2010 x1 = c(rep(0, 244), rep(1, 209)) x2 = c(rep(0, 177), rep(1, 67), rep(0, 169), rep(1, 40)) or1 = sum(x1==1&x2==1)*sum(x1==0&x2==0)/ (sum(x1==1&x2==0)*sum(x1==0&x2==1)) library(epitools) or2 = oddsratio.wald(x1, x2)$measure[2,1] or3 =
2010 Sep 07
2
[LLVMdev] Complex regalloc contraints
Hi all, The machine I am targeting has some special requirements for some operations, say: ADD or1, ir1, r5 would add ir1 (input reg 1) and r5 and put the result in or1 (output reg 1). The point id that input and output regs have to go paired (this meaning an addition of ir1 with whatever always goes to or1, or an in general irX + whatever goes to orX). AFAIK, InstrInfo.td only allow
2020 Mar 26
0
[PATCH nbdkit 9/9] tests/old-plugins: Add plugin from nbdkit 1.18.2.
This is significant because it's a plugin which was from the last stable release containing undefined symbols (in the internal plugins). $ ldd -r tests/old-plugins/x86_64/Linux/v1.18.2/nbdkit-file-plugin.so linux-vdso.so.1 (0x00007ffe86cdd000) libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib64/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x00007f551b3e5000) libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x00007f551b21b000) /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2
2010 Jan 26
4
laughs - how to install wine 1.137 on debian?
Hey guys, i dont know how to install 1.137 on my debian vps. is there some1 who can give me a step by step tutorial? thx :)
2006 Jun 30
3
[LLVMdev] Removing dead code
> > It seems to me that the only instructions > > with dead definitions that I should not remove are the calls. Is it true? > > I would like to know if a code like this below is safe, that is, besides > > call instructions, is there other instructions that must stay in the code > > even if their definitions are dead? > > > > MachineInstr * mi = iter; >
2006 Jun 30
0
[LLVMdev] Removing dead code
On Thu, 29 Jun 2006, Fernando Magno Quintao Pereira wrote: > I am working in a register allocator for LLVM, and I realized that, > after I perform register allocation, there is many move instructions that > are dead code, and can safely be removed. It is easy for the RA algorithm > to remove these instructions. It seems to me that the only instructions > with dead definitions
2006 Jun 30
2
[LLVMdev] Removing dead code
Dear guys, I am working in a register allocator for LLVM, and I realized that, after I perform register allocation, there is many move instructions that are dead code, and can safely be removed. It is easy for the RA algorithm to remove these instructions. It seems to me that the only instructions with dead definitions that I should not remove are the calls. Is it true? I would like to know
2006 Apr 20
2
R-Help
Dear r-users, Suppose I have three datasets: Dataset-1: Date x y Jan-1,2005 120 230 Jan-2,2005 123 -125 Jan-3,2005 -110 300 Jan-4,2005 114 -21 Jan-7,2005 11 299 Mar-5,2005 200 311 Dataset-2: Date x y Jan-2,2005 123 -125 Jan-3,2005 -110 300 Jan-4,2005 114 -21
2013 Apr 27
11
Help
Hello, I have a question and need your help urgently. I am new to R but want to learn it. I have several files in a folder which I have imported to R using : temp = list.files(pattern="*.txt") >myfiles = lapply(temp, read.delim) The resulting files are on the workspace stored as List[110]. So they are 110 files in the list. Each file has several different columns and rows. My
2006 Jul 26
5
linux-2.6-xen.hg
Hi, Is the http://xenbits.xensource.com/linux-2.6-xen.hg tree still being updated? if not, what''s the preferred Linux tree to track that has all of the Xen bits? Thanks, Muli _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
2019 Jan 18
0
[klibc:master] arch: Remove m32r port
Commit-ID: 1e6e96615227de6ca88d096fb0ebe45bf25981c2 Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/?p=libs/klibc/klibc.git;a=commit;h=1e6e96615227de6ca88d096fb0ebe45bf25981c2 Author: Ben Hutchings <ben at decadent.org.uk> AuthorDate: Fri, 18 Jan 2019 00:33:51 +0000 Committer: Ben Hutchings <ben at decadent.org.uk> CommitDate: Fri, 18 Jan 2019 03:10:14 +0000 [klibc] arch: Remove m32r port
2006 Jun 26
0
[klibc 26/43] m32r support for klibc
The parts of klibc specific to the m32r architecture. Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa at zytor.com> --- commit 7ba219f9bcddda38ddc9010b54fd10431292f744 tree 1cf287dfd321d6b980789f49bb0750e8a4217c22 parent 951dc85bd690c6cc5a971815665da947160cbe51 author H. Peter Anvin <hpa at zytor.com> Sun, 25 Jun 2006 16:58:27 -0700 committer H. Peter Anvin <hpa at zytor.com> Sun, 25 Jun
2004 Jun 09
0
Updated squid package fixes security vulnerability
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 There is an update to squid for CentOS 3.1 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2004-242.html refers.
2020 Mar 26
15
[PATCH nbdkit 0/9] Create libnbdkit.so
This creates libnbdkit.so as discussed in the following thread: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2020-March/thread.html#00203 test-delay-shutdown.sh fails for unclear reasons. This series starts by reverting "tests: Don't strand hung nbdkit processes" which is because several other tests fail randomly unless I revert this patch. I didn't investigate this yet so it
2006 Jun 28
35
[klibc 00/31] klibc as a historyless patchset (updated and reorganized)
I have updated the klibc patchset based on feedback received. In particular, the patchset has been reorganized so as not to break git-bisect. Additionally, this updates the patch base to 2.6.17-git12 (d38b69689c349f35502b92e20dafb30c62d49d63) and klibc 1.4.8; the main difference on the klibc side is removal of obsolete code. This is also available as a git tree at:
2009 Jul 23
1
[PATCH server] changes required for fedora rawhide inclusion.
Signed-off-by: Scott Seago <sseago at redhat.com> --- AUTHORS | 17 ++++++ README | 10 +++ conf/ovirt-agent | 12 ++++ conf/ovirt-db-omatic | 12 ++++ conf/ovirt-host-browser | 12 ++++