similar to: Clustered Samba 3.6.6 connection issues

Hi I'm encountering an error with some of my Windows clients when using CTDB and samba to access a GPFS hosted share. We see the following error all the time. [2011/03/14 12:31:16.549084, 1] modules/vfs_gpfs.c:1099(vfs_gpfs_ntimes) vfs_gpfs_ntimes: set GPFS ntimes failed -1 The copy continues but is slow. All the timestamps seem reasonable for the data copied. The GPFS

Hi, I was reading the Clustered Samba Wiki and I noticed the following blurb about OCFS2 and Samba ( http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/CTDB_Setup#Other_cluster_filesystems). I was wondering if anyone can confirm that the "fileid:mapping" is or isn't required for OCFS2. I was also wondering if anyone would be willing to share their experiences with Clustered Samba OCFS2. Does it

Hi Martin I just found the file, it's a config file that about 250 hosts read every half an hour so it makes sense this is getting some contention. However, the strange thing is, the share the file is in is a read-only share: [dist$] comment = Windows dist path = /path/to/share wide links = Yes browseable = Yes read only = Yes guest only = Yes

Hello all, I hope someone could help me to find some (either Samba or Windows XP) configuration settings which would solve the following problems we ar acurrently facing or identify the below described problem being a bug eventually. We have a production Samba 3.5.1 with CTDB clustering on top of GPFS filesystem. Samba is a Windows domain member server serving a number of SMB shares. The strange

Hi David, On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 19:34:25 +0100, David C via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > I have a newly implemented two node CTDB cluster running on CentOS 7, Samba > 4.7.1 > > The node network is a direct 1Gb link > > Storage is Cephfs > > ctdb status is OK > > It seems to be running well so far but I'm frequently seeing the following >

Hi All, Are there any special CTDB/SMB configuration settings/dependencies to manage Winbind across CTDB managed servers authenticating via Active Directory(AD)? An example would be Samba's IDMAP backend for Winbind: RID vs. AD or tag Winbind to a primary CTDB node and point other nodes to authenticate from AD via proxy primary CTDB node? /etc/sysconfig/ctdb on all nodes is as follows:

Hi Martin Many thanks for the detailed response. A few follow-ups inline: On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 5:19 AM Martin Schwenke <martin at meltin.net> wrote: > Hi David, > > On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 19:34:25 +0100, David C via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > I have a newly implemented two node CTDB cluster running on CentOS 7, > Samba > > 4.7.1

On 15/04/2020 16:57, Ralph Boehme via samba wrote: > Am 4/15/20 um 10:59 AM schrieb Giuseppe Lo Presti via samba: >> So the question is do you acknowledge the correct behaviour should be to >> prevent the second client from getting the lock? > > yes. My bet: your cluster filesystem device nummer differs across nodes. Cf: Bingo! Indeed inodes are (obviously) identical, but

Dear, i cannot compile the latest build with cluster support: I have tried the debian repository I have tried by compiling the ctdb-1.0.112-12 via the rsync explained in the wiki I have tried by compiling the ctdb-1.0.114.5 available here : http://ftp.sernet.de/pub/ctdb/1.0.114/src/ctdb-1.0.114.5.tar.gz The samba package still refuse to compile when enable the cluster support: checking

Dear all, after downloading ctdb with rsync -avz samba.org::ftp/unpacked/ctdb and compiling well. I installed on my Centos 5.3 sernet package samba 3.5.2. Also working well. But after setting up ctdb and samba und running it my two nodes freezing for a while And ctdb and samba are down again. On Both nodes My /etc/sysconfig/ctdb: CTDB_RECOVERY_LOCK="/cluster/recovery/recovery"

Hi, everyone, I setup two-node samba cluster with ctdb and glusterfs. When one node fails, another node can takeover ip and cifs sessions, so application can not breaks. Linux cifs client works fine when disable one node. However, it does not work under windows xp. I am copying a big file to samba share, meanwhile I disable the connected node, then copy break with "The specified network

How did you mount your cephfs filesystem? Am 18. September 2018 20:34:25 MESZ schrieb David C via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>: >Hi All > >I have a newly implemented two node CTDB cluster running on CentOS 7, >Samba >4.7.1 > >The node network is a direct 1Gb link > >Storage is Cephfs > >ctdb status is OK > >It seems to be running well so far but

Hi, I have a two server setup that acts as SMB as well as NFS servers in active/active configuration managed by CTDB(http://ctdb.samba.org/). When a file is updated by SMB clients(followed by file-close), other SMB clients can see and modify the file. But when a NFS client (same user) updates the same file(followed by file-close), only one SMB server can see the updates. The clients mounting

Hi, What did I miss / do wrong? My config didn't work like on the below linked video: http://www.samba.org/~tridge/ctdb_movies/node_disable.html With my config, the copy process fails/breaks despite that the tesztxp PC successfully maps the other (samba) PC in case the first (samba) PC is out. In the samba logs (even at log level = 10) I didn't see any information that can help me solve

Dear All, I've been upgrade from 3.6.x to 4.1.x (Member server) All Win 7 Pro 64. While in 3.6.x there is no such report on the issue,just people complain about the slowness While in 4.1.x there are random report on this issue not everyone but more to a particular person... That seem to be happening from 4.1.6, 4.1.11 and 4.1.12 And I've really no idea why or how. Any suggestion to

Am 4/16/20 um 10:42 AM schrieb Giuseppe Lo Presti: > Bingo! > > Indeed inodes are (obviously) identical, but device numbers differ. For > the record, the solution has been to include as suggested: > > ? vfs objects = fileid > ? fileid:algorithm = fsname > > in the global configuration. With this, Microsoft Office - the real use > case - works correctly by detecting

I am following this guide https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_a_Share_Using_Windows_ACLs But hitting issues with setting permissions on the share in Computer Management in the windows AD DC UI. Every time I try I get the error dialog with +----------------------------------------------------------------+ | An error occurred while applying security information to | |

Hello everyone, We have a CentOS 6.3 NFSv4 server and client, and we've run into a situation where the client is unable to list "private" (chmod 700-ed) directories, even if the current user owns the directory in question. A bit more background: we're also using Samba 3.5+Winbind to provide authentication and UID/GID mapping against a Windows 2008 R2 domain controller.

Hi All I have a newly implemented two node CTDB cluster running on CentOS 7, Samba 4.7.1 The node network is a direct 1Gb link Storage is Cephfs ctdb status is OK It seems to be running well so far but I'm frequently seeing the following in my log.smbd: [2018/09/18 19:16:15.897742, 0] > ../source3/lib/dbwrap/dbwrap_ctdb.c:1207(fetch_locked_internal) > db_ctdb_fetch_locked for

Hi, On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 9:51 PM, Adi Kriegisch <adi at cg.tuwien.ac.at> wrote: > Hi! > > A recent kernel security update[1] caused some issues with our ctdb > cluster; messages like: > | We are still serving a public IP 'x.x.x.x' that we should not be > serving. Removing it > | common/system_common.c:89 failed to open raw socket (Invalid argument) >