similar to: [GIT PULL] Xen fixes and cleanups 20130603

Hi all, I have few simple fixes for Xen for the next release: - the first one fixes a regression in qemu-char; - the second one is just a cleanup (that is needed to simplify preprocessor dependencies); - the last one avoids setting nonblocking on Xen (as is already done for KVM). The last two patches should be backported to older branches. Stefano Stabellini (3):

Hi all, this patch series by Wei Liu implements a simple Xen APIC module and use it to deliver MSI/MSIX for Xen HVM guests. The second version of this series includes the "or later" copyright clause for xen_apic.c and a fix to the return value of xen_apic_mem_read (thanks Peter for finding it out). Stefano Stabellini (2): Xen: basic HVM MSI injection support. Xen: Add

Implement a simple Xen APIC module and use it to deliver MSI/MSIX for Xen HVM guests.

Hi all, this small patch series fixes the build breakage introduced by f1dbf015dfb0aa7f66f710a1f1bc58b662951de2 with Xen < 4.2. The problem is that xc_hvm_inject_msi is only defined from Xen 4.2 onwards so we need to provide a compatibility function for older Xen versions. Stefano Stabellini (2): xen,configure: detect Xen 4.2 xen: add a dummy xc_hvm_inject_msi for Xen < 4.2

Hi, I''ve tried several different approaches to debootstrap a working rootfs for with a Cortex A15 model ( FastModels ) and Xen but still face some issues. Some information on my setup. For a Dom0 kernel I''m using the latest version from git://github.com/torvalds/linux.git, I attached my config as it might be of some use for others. I''m using the latest Xen unstable

Hi Stefano, [just casting the net a bit wider ...] On Tue, 19 Oct 2010 18:51:47 +0100 Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini at eu.citrix.com> wrote: > > I forgot to CC the LKML and linux-next... > > On Tue, 19 Oct 2010, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > Stephen, > > I have two patch series to merge in linux-next: > > > > PV on HVM: receive interrupts as

Hi Stefano, [just casting the net a bit wider ...] On Tue, 19 Oct 2010 18:51:47 +0100 Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini at eu.citrix.com> wrote: > > I forgot to CC the LKML and linux-next... > > On Tue, 19 Oct 2010, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > Stephen, > > I have two patch series to merge in linux-next: > > > > PV on HVM: receive interrupts as

Hi Stefano, [just casting the net a bit wider ...] On Tue, 19 Oct 2010 18:51:47 +0100 Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini at eu.citrix.com> wrote: > > I forgot to CC the LKML and linux-next... > > On Tue, 19 Oct 2010, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > Stephen, > > I have two patch series to merge in linux-next: > > > > PV on HVM: receive interrupts as

Hi all, a few weeks ago I (and a few others) started hacking on a proof-of-concept hypervisor port to Cortex-A15 which uses and requires ARMv7 virtualization extensions. The intention of this work was to find out how to best support ARM v7+ on Xen. See http://old-list-archives.xen.org/archives/html/xen-arm/2011-09/msg00013.html for more details. I am pleased to announce that significant progress

Hi all, a few weeks ago I (and a few others) started hacking on a proof-of-concept hypervisor port to Cortex-A15 which uses and requires ARMv7 virtualization extensions. The intention of this work was to find out how to best support ARM v7+ on Xen. See http://old-list-archives.xen.org/archives/html/xen-arm/2011-09/msg00013.html for more details. I am pleased to announce that significant progress

Hi all, a few weeks ago I (and a few others) started hacking on a proof-of-concept hypervisor port to Cortex-A15 which uses and requires ARMv7 virtualization extensions. The intention of this work was to find out how to best support ARM v7+ on Xen. See http://old-list-archives.xen.org/archives/html/xen-arm/2011-09/msg00013.html for more details. I am pleased to announce that significant progress

Hi, I''m having some problems with getting the latest linux kernel and xen build working on ARM''s Fast Model simulator ( Cortex A15 ). I tried a lot of different configurations and I''m having trouble with all of them. I got all my information from the wiki pages at http://wiki.xen.org/wiki/Xen_ARMv7_with_Virtualization_Extensions#Building_Xen_on_ARM . I was hoping

Hi, I have noticed that, in the code of linux/drivers/xen/balloon.c, there exists the snippet as this: static int __init balloon_init(void) { unsigned long pfn; struct page *page; if (!xen_pv_domain()) return -ENODEV; ..... } Does it means the driver will not work in HVM? If so, where is the HVN-enabled code for that? 2010-11-16 Rui Chu _______________________________________________

Hi Jeremy, I backported the branch I have in linux-next plus some older PV on HVM fixes to stable-2.6.32.x. Please pull: git://xenbits.xen.org/people/sstabellini/linux-pvhvm.git stable-2.6.32-pvhvm Ian Campbell (11): xen: do not respond to unknown xenstore control requests xen: use new schedop interface for suspend xen: switch to new schedop hypercall by default. xen:

On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 05:10:25PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg at mellanox.com> > > DMA_SHARED_BUFFER can not be enabled by the user (it represents a library > set in the kernel). The kconfig convention is to use select for such > symbols so they are turned on implicitly when the user enables a kconfig > that needs them. > > Otherwise

Hi folks, From the roadmap for Xen 4.3 development, Xen 4.3 will use upstream QEMU (partially done). So I''d like to confirm the following questions. 1. Will Xen 4.3 really use upstream QEMU by default ? I have the question because so far the xen.git tree still uses qemu-xen-unstable by default. 2. If ''yes'' for 1st question, which QEMU upstream will be used in Xen

On 21.08.20 12:34, David Hildenbrand wrote: > Let's reuse the new mechanism to merge system ram resources below the > root. We are the only one hotplugging system ram (e.g., DIMMs don't apply), > so this is safe to be used. > > Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm at linux-foundation.org> > Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko at suse.com> > Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky

On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 02:07:01PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 1:54 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 01:27:29PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > >> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 1:16 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > >> > On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 11:01:38AM -0700, Andy

On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 02:07:01PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 1:54 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 01:27:29PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > >> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 1:16 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > >> > On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 11:01:38AM -0700, Andy

Hi,all I have tried to passthrough GPU card(Nvidia quadro 4000) on the latest Xen unstable version (QEMU is using Qemu-upsteam-unstable, not traditional Qemu). This issue as below: Windows7 64-bit guest will blue screen when GPU passthrough configure 4g memory,blue screen code is 50, and SUSE 11 64-bit guest will always stay at the grub screen. I noticed that it will relocate RAM that