similar to: wilcox_test function in coin package

Hello, I use t.test for normal distributed and wilcox.test for non-normal distributed samples. It is easy to write a function for t.test that calculates the effect size, because all parts of the formula are available from the t.test result: r = sqrt(t*t / (t*t + df)) However, for Wilcoxon tests, the formula for effect sizes is: r = Z / sqrt(N) I wonder how I can calculate the Z-score in R for

Greetings! We are trying to obtain confidence and prediction intervals for a predicted Y value from bootstrapped linear regression using the boot function. Does anyone know how to code it? Greatly appreciated. Janh [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hello Rui, Thanks for your helpful suggestions. Just for illustration, let's use the well known Duncan dataset of prestige vs education + income that is contained in the "car" package. Suppose I wish to use boot function to bootstrap a linear regression of prestige ~ education + income and use the following script: duncan.function <- function(data, indices) {data =

Dear R-forumites, I want to apply a Wilcoxon test on subsets of the data frame mydata, splitted using the myindice variable. When I send : wilcoxtest <- by(mydata, mydata$myindice, function(x) {wilcox_test(x$value~x$fact)}) I get : Error in eval(expr, envir, enclos) : object "x" not found whereas wilcoxtest <- by(mydata, mydata$myindice, function(x)

Dear Users Regarding the NADA package, would anyone be able to help me understand what values are actually plotted on the Y axis of the plot obtained by using the *ros* function on the data and plotting the result with the plot() function? The Y axis is labeled "Values". According to the NADA user manual, ros performs a log transformation of the data by default, but the user can specify

Hi, I became a little bit confused when working with the Wilcoxon test in R. As far as I understood, there are mainly two versions: 1) wilcox.test{stats}, which is the default and an approximation, especially, when ties are involved 2) wilcox_test{coin}, which does calculate the distribution _exactly_ even, with ties. I have the following scenario: #---BeginCode--- # big example size = 60

R-help is not a free coding service. We expect users to make the effort to learn R and *may* provide help when they get stuck. Pay a local R programmer if you do not wish to make such an effort. Cheers, Bert On Oct 14, 2017 7:58 AM, "Janh Anni" <annijanh at gmail.com> wrote: Greetings! We are trying to obtain confidence and prediction intervals for a predicted Y value from

Hello, Much clearer now, thanks. It's a matter of changing the function boot calls to return the predicted values at the point of interess, education = 50, income = 75. I have changed the way the function uses the indices a bit, the result is the same, it's just the way I usually do it. pred.duncan.function <- function(data, indices) { mod <- lm(prestige ~ education +

Hi, I am running the following example which can be found on page 12 of the pdf file of COIN package wt<-wilcox_test(pd~age,data=water_transfer,distribution="exact", conf.int=TRUE) "wt" actually contains the estimate of difference in location and the confidence interval of it. I am just wondering how can I extract these values? From the examples, I understand that the

Hello All, Would anyone be able to help me understand how R computes a quantile-quantile plot for comparing two data samples with unequal sample sizes? Normally, the procedure should be to rearrange the larger data sample into n equally-spaced parts using interpolation, where n is the sample size of the smaller sample, and then plot the matching data pairs. I tried using different plotting

Dear Sir, I am doing some work on a population of patients. About half of them are admitted into hospital with albumin levels less than 33. The other half have albumin levels greater than 33, so I stratify them into 2 groups, x and y respectively. I suspect that the average length of stay in hospital for the group of patients (x) with albumin levels less than 33 is greater than those

An earlier post had posed the question: "Does anybody know what is relation between 'T' value calculated by 'wilcox_test' function (coin package) and more common 'W' value?" I found the question interesting and ran the commands in R and SPSS. The W reported by R did not seem to correspond to either Mann-Whitney U, Wilcoxon W or the Z which I have more

Dear Sir, I am comparing two samples using wilcox.test in R. Literature appears to describe mann whitney u test as the most appropriate test to use on my data. is the wilcox.test function equivalent to mann-whitney u? Is there a way to gain the U-value as apposed to the W-value in R? Thank you

Does anyone know why wilcox.exact gives W-statistic 6 instead of 12 as indicated below. 12 is the rank sum of group 0 of x, which is the linear statistic computed by wilcox_test. y<-c(1,2,3,4,5) x<-c(1,1,0,0,0) (a) wilcox.exact wilcox.exact(y~x) Exact Wilcoxon rank sum test data: y by x W = 6, p-value = 0.2 alternative hypothesis: true mu is not equal to 0 (b) wilcox_test

I need to perform the Exact Wilcoxon Mann-Whitney on a subset of my database. Assuming that IPPO is my data frame and IPPOBIS is the subset my variable still have 3 different levels and the function wilcox_test (package "coin") does not accept it. I do not know how to overcome this problem. ippo <- c(rep("A",10),rep("B",10),rep("C",10)) ippo2 <-

Hi, I am very confused with constructing the wilcox.test in R. I have two populations 'original' and 'test'. I want to know if the 'test' is generally 'lower' than original. I use alpha of 0.05. So do I write the function as wilcox.test(original, test, alternative="l")? or wlcox.test(original, test, alternative = "g")? or wilcox.test(test,

Hi, I try to boxplot following data on the subset of (V1,V3,V5,V7) and (V2,V4,V6,V8) V1 V2 V3 V4 V5 V6 V7 V8 2 4 6 7 12 33 43 53 how can I use boxplot function to plot it? thanks, William

Hi, R allows me to run a one sample Wilcoxon test like this: wilcox.test(c(1,3.5,2.1,4,1.5,5), mu=2, exact=TRUE) The function 'wilcoxsign_test' from the package 'coin' should (I suppose) be able to calculate exact p values even if there are ties in the ranks. However, I couldn't find information on how to run a one sample test using 'wilcoxsign_test' like in the

I have a question concerning the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, and specifically, which R subroutine I should use for my particular dataset. There are three different commands in R (that I'm aware of) that calculate the Wilcoxon signed-rank test; wilcox.test, wilcox.exact, and wilcoxsign_test. When I run the three commands on the same dataset, I get different p-values. I'm hoping that

Dear List, after updating the exactRanksumTests package I receive a warning that the package is not developed any further and that one should consider the coin package. I don't find the signed rank test in the coin package, only the Wilcoxon Mann Whitney U-Test. I only found a signed rank test in the stats package (wilcox.test) which is able to calculate the exact pvalues but unfortunately