similar to: CentOS-Fasttrack readme and repo file is missing?

Greetings, I tried to install FASTTRACK repos today from this link: http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories and the links were broken e.g. http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6/fasttrack/CentOS-fasttrack.repo fyi, Max Pyziur pyz at brama.com

A quick question on the fasttrack repo which is now up to date with upstream. Why is the fasttrack repo not in the main CentOS-Base.repo file but contrib which has never had anything is included in the main CentOS-Base.repo file? The goal of CentOS is to be binary-compatible with upstream so fasttrack is "more important" in this regard than contrib. Upsteam ships with the main channels

Hello, The links under the CentOS-Fasttrack paragraph at http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories all refer to non existent pages/files at mirror.centos.org. Where can one find the repo files and readme? Regards, Leonard. -- mount -t life -o ro /dev/dna /genetic/research

Hi, Johnny, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 5/2/19 9:15 AM, mark wrote: >> >> Especially Johnny - could you possibly push this fix through as soon as >> upstream puts it out? It's a real issue for us - we've had a number of >> servers whether gssproxy keeps SEGVing, which hits NFS and samba. > > See if this fixes your issues .. if do, let me know and we can

Hi, Johnny, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 5/2/19 9:15 AM, mark wrote: >> >> Especially Johnny - could you possibly push this fix through as soon as >> upstream puts it out? It's a real issue for us - we've had a number of >> servers whether gssproxy keeps SEGVing, which hits NFS and samba. > > See if this fixes your issues .. if do, let me know and we can

Greetings, Are FASTTRACK updates delivered by way of a different repo? Thanks. Max Pyziur pyz at brama.com ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 11:29:52 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> Reply-To: centos at centos.org To: centos-announce at centos.org Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2012:1035 CentOS 5 telnet FASTTRACK Update CentOS Errata and

The *CentOS-Fasttrack *paragraph of http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories links to http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6/fasttrack/CentOS-fasttrack.repo which returns a 404. https://web.archive.org/web/20141011004000/http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6/fasttrack/CentOS-fasttrack.repo is a copy captured on Oct 11, 2014, which indicates CentOS-6 Fasttrack was around at that time.

Hi, On the page http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories?action=show ... CentOS-6 Fasttrack is now available and can be accessed with the repo configuration here<http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6/fasttrack/CentOS-fasttrack.repo> . But link is died: http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6/fasttrack/CentOS-fasttrack.repo Anyone could help me to found this file please ? Thanks,

The upstream provider has started a new channel called fastrack. It is detailed here (see the whole thread): https://www.redhat.com/archives/nahant-list/2006-April/msg00001.html CentOS will also build the fastrack SRPMS. We have created separate repositories in CentOS-3 and CentOS-4 called fasttrack. (I know the spelling is different, that is by design. We don't want to use the name of

Hi, where I can find former file centos/4/fasttrack/CentOS-fasttrack.repo? Thanks, David

http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories Under "CentOS-Fasttrack", the links to the Readme and CentOS6 repo are broken (again, if the list archives are anything to go by ...).

Does anyone know what are all the centos 6 reppos? I have: CentOS-Base.repo CentOS-Debuginfo.repo CentOS-fasttrack.repo CentOS-Media.repo CentOS-Vault.repo devtools.repo epel.repo epel-testing.repo rpmfusion-free-updates.repo rpmfusion-free-updates-testing.repo rpmfusion-nonfree-updates.repo rpmfusion-nonfree-updates-testing.repo Am I missing a repo I am not aware of?

Unless I'm mistaken, does it look like Centos 4.7 is missing an update released on December 3rd 2008? Upstream details :- http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2008-0989.html An updated tmpwatch package that fixes various bugs is now available. The tmpwatch utility recursively searches through specified directories and removes files which have not been accessed in a specified period of time.

Hi, folks, Especially Johnny - could you possibly push this fix through as soon as upstream puts it out? It's a real issue for us - we've had a number of servers whether gssproxy keeps SEGVing, which hits NFS and samba. Thanks in advance. mark ---------------------------- Original Message ---------------------------- Subject: [Bug 1699331] gssproxy segmentation fault

I don't know if it's useful to report this: (& who should I report it to?) # yum update [...] * base: mirrors.ircam.fr * extras: mirrors.ircam.fr * fasttrack: mirror.ovh.net * remi-ff: rpms.famillecollet.com * updates: centosq3.centos.org base | 3.7 kB 00:00 cr | 2.9 kB 00:00 extras | 3.4 kB 00:00 fasttrack | 3.4 kB 00:00 Not using downloaded repomd.xml

Hi all :-) This is my first post: I'm coming from debian/bsd world. A question about repositories: minimal installation (version 7) provides: CentOS-Base.repo CentOS-CR.repo CentOS-Debuginfo.repo CentOS-fasttrack.repo CentOS-Sources.repo CentOS-Vault.repo I known there are others repositories as: RPMForge, EPEL, REMI, ATrpms, Webtatic (and maybe also others) so, what kind of these

The permissions are apparently set incorrectly on the vnc SRPM in the FastTrack repo on mirror; I get "permission denied" when I try to mirror it. Thanks. Josh Kelley

CentOS just announced an exim FASTTRACK package http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2011-April/017438.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0443.html While I am not interested in local_scan() or man pages, Bugzilla #606272 looks mysterious because I can not find information about it. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=606272 The only information I see is comment 16

anyone have experiences installing SATA raid card with CentOS/RHEL? I am considering Promise FastTrak S150 Tx2 plus, FastTrack 2200 or FastTrack S150 Sx4 Which one of these ( or any othe brand) can ensure smooth install of CentOS without problems, thanks. :)Harris LIU

On 5/2/19 9:15 AM, mark wrote: > Hi, folks, > > Especially Johnny - could you possibly push this fix through as soon as > upstream puts it out? It's a real issue for us - we've had a number of > servers whether gssproxy keeps SEGVing, which hits NFS and samba. > Mark, See if this fixes your issues .. if do, let me know and we can get it released into the fasttrack